A simulation of two-dimensional turbulent forced convection in a plane asymmetric diffuser with an expansion ratio of 4.7 is performed, and the effect of the diffuser angle on the flow and heat transfer is reported. This geometry is common in many heat exchanging devices, and the turbulent convective heat transfer in it has not been examined. The momentum transport in this geometry, however, has received significant attention already, and the studies show that the results from the υ2¯f type turbulence models provide better agreement with measured velocity distributions than that from the kε or kω turbulence models. In addition, the υ2¯f type turbulence models have been shown to provide good heat transfer results for separated and reattached flows. The kεζ (υ2¯f type) turbulence model is used in this study due to its improved numerical robustness, and the FLUENT-CFD code is used as the simulation platform. User defined functions for the kεζ turbulence model were developed and incorporated into the FLUENT-CFD code, and that process is validated by simulating the flow and the heat transfer in typical benchmark problems and comparing these results with available measurements. This new capability is used to study the effect of the diffuser angle on forced convection in an asymmetric diffuser, and the results show that the angle influences significantly both the flow and the thermal field. The increase in that angle increases the size of the recirculation flow region and enhances the rate of the heat transfer.

1.
Obi
,
S.
,
Aoki
,
K.
, and
Masuda
,
S.
, 1993, “
Experimental and Computational Study of Separating Flow in an Asymmetric Plane Diffuser
,”
Ninth Symposium in Turbulent Shear Flows
, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 16–19, pp.
305
-1–305-
4
.
2.
Buice
,
C.
, and
Eaton
,
J.
, 1996, “
Experimental Investigation of Flow Through an Asymmetric Plane Diffuser
,” Annual Research Briefs, Center of Turbulence Research, Stanford University, pp.
243
248
.
3.
Buice
,
C.
, and
Eaton
,
J.
, 2000, “
Experimental Investigation of Flow Through an Asymmetric Plane Diffuser
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
122
, pp.
433
435
.
4.
Makiola
,
B.
, and
Ruck
,
B.
, 1990, “
Experimental Investigation of a Single-sided Backward-Facing Step Flow With Inclined Step Geometries
,”
Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments
,
Elsevier
,
New York
, pp.
487
497
.
5.
Iaccarino
,
G.
, 2001, “
Predictions of a Turbulent Separated Flow Using Commercial CFD Codes
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
123
, pp.
819
828
.
6.
Kaltenbach
,
H.
,
Fatica
,
M.
,
Mittal
,
R.
,
Lund
,
T.
, and
Moin
,
P.
, 1999, “
Study of Flow in a Plane Asymmetric Diffuser Using Large-Eddy Simulation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
390
, pp.
151
185
.
7.
Apsley
,
D.
, and
Leschziner
,
M.
, 1999, “
Advanced Turbulence Modeling of Separated Flow in a Diffuser
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
1386-6184,
63
, pp.
81
112
.
8.
Lien
,
F.
, and
Kalitzin
,
G.
, 2001, “
Computations of Transonic Flow With the υ2¯‐f Turbulence Model
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
0142-727X,
22
, pp.
53
61
.
9.
Durbin
,
P.
, 1991, “
Near-Wall Turbulence Closure Modeling Without Damping Functions
,”
Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
0935-4964,
3
, pp.
1
13
.
10.
Durbin
,
P.
, 1995, “
Separated Flow Computations With the k−ε−υ2¯ Model
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
33
(
4
), pp.
659
664
.
11.
Laurence
,
D.
,
Uribe
,
J.
, and
Utyuzhnikov
,
S.
, 2004, “
A Robust Formulation of the υ2¯‐f Model
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
1386-6184,
73
, pp.
169
185
.
12.
Lien
,
F.
, and
Durbin
,
P.
, 1996, “
Non-Linear k−ε−υ2¯ Modeling With Application to High-Lift
,”
Proceedings of 1996 Summer Programme
, Centre for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, pp.
5
22
.
13.
Davidson
,
L.
,
Nielsen
,
P.
, and
Sveningsson
,
A.
, 2003, “
Modifications of the υ2¯‐f Model for Computing the Flow in a 3D Wall Jet
,”
Turbulence Heat and Mass Transfer 4
,
K.
Hanjalic
,
Y.
Nagano
, and
M. J.
Tummers
, eds.,
Begell House, Inc.
,
New York
, pp.
577
584
.
14.
Hanjalic
,
K.
,
Popovac
,
M.
, and
Hadziabdic
,
M.
, 2004, “
A Robust Near-wall Elliptic-Relaxation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Model for CFD
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
0142-727X,
25
, pp.
1047
1051
.
15.
Moser
,
R.
,
Kim
,
J.
, and
Mansour
,
N.
, 1999, “
Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Channel Flow Up to Reτ=590
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
11
, pp.
943
945
.
16.
Vogel
,
J.
, and
Eaton
,
J.
, 1984, “
Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Measurements in the Turbulent Reattaching Flow Behind a Backward-Facing Step
,”
Stanford University
, Report No. MD-44.
17.
FLUENT 6.2 User’s Guide, Fluent Inc., 2005.
18.
Baughn
,
J.
, and
Shimizu
,
S.
, 1989, “
Heat Transfer Measurements From a Surface With Uniform Heat Flux and an Impinging Jet
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
111
, pp.
1096
1098
.
19.
Buice
,
C.
, and
Eaton
,
J.
, 1997, “
Experimental and Computational Study of Turbulent Separating Flow in an Asymmetric Plane Diffuser
,” Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University
, CA, Report No. TSD-107.
You do not currently have access to this content.