The uses of a weighting factor along with a time step in a single-step trapezoidal method to solve a first-order parabolic system have been systematically studied. The weighting factors are used in two main types: constants and variables. The most commonly used constant weighting factors can be defined by the ratio of the Fibonacci sequence. Among them, the optimal weighting factor is 0.618, resulting in a balance between the overall accuracy and efficiency. With the finite element formulation, the space and time dimensions can be discretized separately. For the time discretization only, there exists a zero-error dimensionless time step if a weighting factor is within the range of 0.5–1.0. By taking advantage of the zero-error condition, the weighting factor can be correlated with a time step. The influence of spatial dimensions is lumped into a nonzero eigenvalue of the system. Through validity tests of two benchmark linear problems, the variable weighting factor for a single-step trapezoidal method is shown to be accurate, efficient, and stable. The relevant features have been captured.

1.
Euler
,
L.
, 1913, “
De Integratione Aequationum Differentialium per Approximationem
,”
Opera Omnia, Series Prima, Opera Mathematica
,
11
, pp.
424
434
.
2.
Crank
,
J.
, and
Nicolson
,
P.
, 1947, “
A Practical Method for the Numerical Evaluation of Solutions of Partial Differential Equations of the Heat Conduction Type
,”
Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.
0068-6735,
43
, pp.
50
67
.
3.
Liniger
,
W.
, 1968, “
Optimization of a Numerical Integration Method for Stiff System of Ordinary Differential Equations
,” IBM Research Report No. RC2198.
4.
Zlamal
,
M.
, 1977,
Finite Element Methods in Heat Conduction Problems
,
Academic
,
New York
.
5.
Tamma
,
K. K.
,
Zhou
,
X.
, and
Kanapady
,
R.
, 2002, “
The Time Dimension and A Unified Mathematical Framework for First-Order Parabolic Systems
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B
1040-7790,
41
, pp.
239
262
.
6.
Wood
,
W. L.
, 1990,
Practical Time-Stepping Schemes
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
7.
Patankar
,
S. V.
, and
Baliga
,
B. R.
, 1978, “
A New Finite-Difference Scheme for Parabolic Differential Equations
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer
0149-5720,
1
, pp.
27
37
.
8.
Chen
,
C. J.
, and
Li
,
P.
, 1979, “
Finite Differential Method in Heat Conduction—Application of Analytical Solution Technique
,” ASME Winter Annual Meeting, December 2–7, New York, ASME Paper No. 79-WA/T-50.
9.
Mercer
,
A. M.
, 1982, “
Some New Finite-Difference Scheme for Parabolic Differential Equations
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer
0149-5720,
5
, pp.
199
210
.
10.
Li
,
S.
, 1988, “
Optimal Exponential Difference Scheme for Solving Parabolic Partial Differential Equations
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer
0149-5720,
14
, pp.
357
371
.
11.
Belytschko
,
T.
, and
Hughes
,
T. J. R.
, 1983,
Computational Methods for Transient Analysis
,
Elsevier Science
,
North Holland
,
Amsterdam
.
12.
Hughes
,
T. J. R.
, 1987,
The Finite Element Method
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
13.
Zhao
,
F.
, 2003, “
Optimal Weighting Factor for Single-Step Trapezoidal Method
,” 2003 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 15–21, Washington, D.C., Paper No. IMECE-41109.
14.
Zienkiewicz
,
O. C.
, and
Taylor
,
R. L.
, 2000,
The Finite Element Method
,
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Boston
, Vol.
2
.
You do not currently have access to this content.