Complex radiant enclosure problems are often best treated by calculating exchange factors through Monte Carlo simulation. Because of its inherent statistical nature, however, these exchange factor estimations contain random errors that cause violations of the reciprocity rule of exchange factors, and consequently the second law of thermodynamics. Heuristically adjusting a set of exchange factors to satisfy reciprocity usually results in a violation of the summation rule of exchange factors and the first law of thermodynamics. This paper presents a method for smoothing exchange factors based on constrained maximum likelihood estimation. This method works by finding the set of exchange factors that maximizes the probability that the observed bundle emissions and absorptions would occur subject to the reciprocity and summation rules of exchange factors as well as a nonnegativity constraint. The technique is validated by using it to smooth the sets of exchange factors corresponding to two three-dimensional radiant enclosure problems.

1.
Ertürk
,
H
,
Ezekoye
,
O. A.
, and
Howell
,
J. R.
, 2001, “
Inverse Transient Boundary Estimation Problem in a Radiating Enclosure
,”
Proc. of the 31st ASME National Heat Transfer Conference
, Anaheim, CA, June, pp. 10-12.
2.
van Leersum
,
J.
, 1989, “
A Method for Determining a Consistent Set of Radiation View Factors from a Set Generated by a Nonexact Method
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
0142-727X,
10
, pp.
83
85
.
3.
Lawson
,
D. A.
, 1995, “
An Improved Method for Smoothing Approximate Exchange Areas
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
0017-9310,
38
, pp.
3109
3110
.
4.
Taylor
,
R. P.
,
Luck
,
R.
,
Hodge
,
B. K.
, and
Steel
,
W. G.
, 1995, “
Uncertainty Analysis of Diffuse-Grey Radiation Enclosure Problems
,”
J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer
0887-8722,
9
, pp.
63
69
.
5.
Vercammen
,
H. A. J.
, and
Froment
,
G. F.
, 1980, “
An Improved Zone Method Using Monte Carlo Techniques for the Simulation of Radiation in Industrial Furnaces
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
0017-9310,
23
, pp.
329
337
.
6.
Larsen
,
M. E.
, and
Howell
,
J. R.
, 1986, “
Least-Squares Smoothing of Direct Exchange Areas in Zonal Analysis
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
108
, pp.
239
242
.
7.
Loehrke
,
R. I.
,
Dolagham
,
J. S.
, and
Burns
,
P. J.
, 1995, “
Smoothing Monte Carlo Exchange Factors
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
117
, pp.
524
526
.
8.
Jamshidian
,
M.
, 2004, “
On Algorithms for Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation
,”
Comput. Stat. Data Anal.
0167-9473,
45
, pp.
137
157
.
9.
Schoenberg
,
R.
1997, “
Constrained Maximum Likelihood
,”
Comput. Econ.
0927-7099,
10
, pp.
251
266
.
10.
Brooke
,
A.
,
Kendrick
,
D.
,
Meeraus
,
A.
,
Raman
,
R.
, 1998, “
GAMS: A User’s Guide
,”
GAMS Development Corporation
, WA, DC, http://www.gams.comhttp://www.gams.com
11.
Drud
,
A.
, 1985, “
CONOPT: A GRG Code for Large Sparse Dynamic Nonlinear Optimization Problems
,”
Math. Program.
0025-5610,
31
, pp.
153
191
.
12.
Daun
,
K. J.
,
Morton
,
D. P.
, and
Howell
,
J. R.
, 2003, “
Geometric Optimization of Radiant Enclosures Containing Specular Surfaces
”,
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
125
, pp.
845
851
.