This paper considers the fundamental problem of optimizing the geometry of the interface between two conductive bodies, with the objective of minimizing the thermal resistance. The interface geometry is free to change. For simplicity, the geometry is assumed to be two-dimensional with equidistant tooth-shaped features. The tooth shape varies from triangles, to trapezoids and rectangles. The aspect ratio (height/width) of the tooth also varies. The third degree of freedom of the interface architecture is the volume fraction of the higher-conductivity tooth material that is present in the interface region. It is shown that the interface geometry can be optimized with respect to tooth shape. The global thermal resistance minimized with respect to tooth shape varies monotonically with the tooth aspect ratio and volume fraction. The optimized geometry and performance are reported graphically as functions of the physical properties and geometric parameters of the interface region.

Issue Section:
Technical Notes
Keywords:
interface phenomena, optimisation, thermal resistance, Constructal, Contact Resistance, Geometry, Roughness
Topics:
Geometry, Shapes, Thermal conductivity, Thermal resistance, Design, Optimization, Degrees of freedom
1.
Bejan, A., 2000, Shape and Structure, from Engineering to Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2.
Bejan
,
A.
,
1996
, “
Street Network Theory of Organization in Nature
,”
J. Adv. Transp.
,
30
(
7
), pp.
85
–
107
.
3.
Bejan
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Constructal-Theory Network of Conducting Paths for Cooling a Heat Generating Volume
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
40
, pp.
799
–
816
.
4.
Bar-Cohen
,
A.
, and
Rohsenow
,
W. M.
,
1984
, “
Thermally Optimum Spacing of Vertical, Natural Convection Cooled, Parallel Plates
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
106
, pp.
116
–
123
.
5.
Peterson
,
G. P.
, and
Ortega
,
A.
,
1990
, “
Thermal Control of Electronic Equipment and Devices
,”
Adv. Heat Transfer
,
20
, pp.
181
–
314
.
6.
Knight
,
R. W.
,
Goodling
,
J. S.
, and
Hall
,
D. J.
,
1991
, “
Optimal Thermal Design of Forced Convection Heat Sinks—Analytical
,”
ASME J. Electron. Packag.
,
113
, pp.
313
–
321
.
7.
Anand
,
N. K.
,
Kim
,
S. H.
, and
Fletcher
,
L. S.
,
1992
, “
The Effect of Plate Spacing on Free Convection Between Heated Parallel Plates
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
114
, pp.
515
–
518
.
8.
Kakac, S., Yu¨ncu¨, H., and Hijikata, K., eds., 1994, Cooling of Electronic Systems, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
9.
Kraus, A. D., and Bar-Cohen, A., 1995, Design and Analysis of Heat Sinks, Wiley, New York.
10.
Kraus, A. D., Aziz, A., and Welty, J., 2001, Extended Surface Heat Transfer, Wiley, New York.
11.
Shah, R. K., and Mueller, A. C., 1985, “Heat Exchangers,” in Handbook of Heat Transfer Applications, 2nd ed., W. M. Rohsenow, J. P. Hartnett, and E. N. Ganic, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap. 4.
12.
Hesselgreaves, J. E., 2001, Compact Heat Exchangers: Selection, Design and Operation, Pergamon, Amsterdam.
13.
Bejan, A., 1997, Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, Chap. 13.
14.
Neagu
,
M.
, and
Bejan
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Constructal Placement of High-Conductivity Inserts in a Slab: Optimal Design of Roughness
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
123
, pp.
1184
–
1189
.
15.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Taylor, R. L., 1989, The Finite Element Method, 1, McGraw-Hill, London.
16.
Editorial, 1994, “Journal of Heat Transfer Editorial Policy Statement on Numerical Accuracy,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 116, pp. 797–798.
17.
Bejan, A., 1993, Heat Transfer, Wiley, New York, p. 76.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.