Abstract

Reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) has been widely incorporated into roadway base and surface courses, as they provide economic and environmental benefits that lead to sustainable construction practices. However, because of the increasing use of paving interlayers (e.g., geotextiles, geogrids, and geocomposites) during roadway rehabilitation, the likelihood of milling projects involving asphalt layers with paving interlayers (referred to as GRAP) has significantly increased. Consequently, the assessment of potential GRAP reuse in geotechnical and pavement applications becomes essential. This research study aims at evaluating the millability and recyclability of asphalt layers with paving interlayers. Specifically, sections with and without paving interlayers were first milled to evaluate the millability of asphalt layers with paving interlayers. Subsequently, the recyclability of GRAP for the base and surface course of pavements was assessed by quantifying the geotechnical characteristics of millings collected from asphalt layers with paving interlayers, referred herein as geosynthetic RAP or GRAP, and those without paving interlayers (RAP). The evaluation of RAP and GRAP materials for road base suitability included blending them with virgin aggregates and investigating these blends via determination of particle size distribution, binder content, compaction characteristics, abrasion resistance, hydraulic conductivity, and resilient modulus. The evaluation of RAP and GRAP materials for surface course suitability involved preparing asphalt mixtures that incorporated RAP and GRAP and quantifying their particle size distribution, indirect tensile strength, and moisture susceptibility. Comparison of the results obtained from five different base course blends and five different asphalt mixtures demonstrated that the base course blends and asphalt mixtures with GRAP exhibited properties similar to those with RAP. Also, the results of this investigation indicate that asphalt mixtures (surface course) and granular base courses can incorporate up to 30 % and 50 % GRAP, respectively, thus leading to sustainable roadway construction practices.

References

1.
AASHTO.
2021
.
Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials
. AASHTO T307. Washington, DC:
American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials
.
2.
AASHTO.
2021
.
Standard Specification for Materials for Aggregate and Soil-Aggregate Subbase, Base, and Surface Courses
. AASHTO M147. Washington, DC:
American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials
.
3.
AASHTO.
2022
.
Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate
. AASHTO T85. Washington, DC:
American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials
.
4.
AASHTO.
2022
.
Standard Method of Test Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures
. AASHTO T164-22. Washington, DC:
American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials
.
5.
ASTM International.
2015
.
Standard Test Method for Preparation and Determination of the Relative Density of Asphalt Mix Specimens by Means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor
. ASTM D6925-15. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved January 1,
2015
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6925-15
6.
ASTM International.
2017
.
Standard Test Method for Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Asphalt Mixtures
. ASTM D6931-17. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved July 1,
2017
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6931-17
7.
ASTM International.
2020
.
Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine
. ASTM C131/C131M-20. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved February 15,
2020
. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0131_C0131M-20
8.
ASTM International.
2021
.
Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3))
. ASTM D1557-12(2021). West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved July 1,
2021
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1557-12R21
9.
ASTM International.
2022
.
Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Coarse-Grained Soils
. ASTM D2434-22. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved March 15,
2022
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2434-22
10.
ASTM International.
2022
.
Standard Test Method for Effect of Moisture on Asphalt Concrete Paving Mixtures
. ASTM D4867/D4867M-22. West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved November 1,
2022
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4867_D4867M-22
11.
Button
,
J. W.
and
Lytton
R. L.
.
2003
.
Guidelines for Using Geosynthetics with HMA Overlays to Reduce Reflective Cracking. Report 1777-P2, Project Number 0-1777
.
Austin, TX
:
Texas Department of Transportation
.
12.
Canestrari
,
F.
,
Cardone
F.
,
Gaudenzi
E.
,
Chiola
D.
,
Gasbarro
N.
, and
Ferrotti
G.
.
2022
. “
Interlayer Bonding Characterization of Interfaces Reinforced with Geocomposites in Field Applications
.”
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
50
, no. 
1
(February):
154
162
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.09.010
13.
Cavalli
,
M. C.
,
Partl
M. N.
, and
Poulikakos
L. D.
.
2017
. “
Measuring the Binder Film Residues on Black Rock in Mixtures with High Amounts of Reclaimed Asphalt
.”
Journal of Cleaner Production
149
(
April
):
665
672
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.055
14.
Correia
,
N. S.
and
Zornberg
J. G.
.
2016
. “
Mechanical Response of Flexible Pavements Enhanced with Geogrid-Reinforced Asphalt Overlays
.”
Geosynthetics International
23
, no. 
3
(June):
183
193
. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00041
15.
Daryaee
,
D.
,
Ameri
M.
, and
Mansourkhaki
A.
.
2020
. “
Utilizing of Waste Polymer Modified Bitumen in Combination with Rejuvenator in High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mixtures
.”
Construction and Building Materials
235
(February): 117516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117516
16.
Dong
,
Q.
and
Huang
B.
.
2014
. “
Laboratory Evaluation on Resilient Modulus and Rate Dependencies of RAP Used as Unbound Base Material
.”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
26
, no. 
2
(February):
379
383
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000820
17.
Gu
,
F.
,
Andrews
D.
, and
Marienfeld
M.
.
2021
. “
Evaluation of Bond Strength, Permeability, and Recyclability of Geosynthetic Products
.” In
Proceedings of Geosynthetics Conference 2021
,
362
373
.
Roseville, MN
:
Industrial Fabrics Association International
.
18.
Guduru
,
G.
,
Tavva
T. L.
, and
Kuna
K.
.
2022
. “
Estimation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Characteristics Using Simple Indicative Tests
.”
Road Materials and Pavement Design
23
, no. 
4
:
822
848
. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2020.1845785
19.
Guo
,
N.
,
You
Z.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Tan
Y.
, and
Diab
A.
.
2014
. “
Laboratory Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt Containing Recycled Asphalt Mixtures
.”
Construction and Building Materials
64
(August):
141
149
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.002
20.
Gupta
,
S.
,
Kang
D. H.
, and
Ranaivoson
A.
.
2009
.
Hydraulic and Mechanical Properties of Recycled Materials. Final Report No. 2009-32
. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
21.
Huang
,
B.
,
Li
G.
,
Vukosavljevic
D.
,
Shu
X.
, and
Egan
B. K.
.
2005
. “
Laboratory Investigation of Mixing Hot-Mix Asphalt with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
.”
Transportation Research Record
1929
, no. 
1
(January):
37
45
. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192900105
22.
Kim
,
W.
,
Labuz
J. F.
, and
Dai
S.
.
2007
. “
Resilient Modulus of Base Course Containing Recycled Asphalt Pavement
.”
Transportation Research Record
2005
, no. 
1
(January):
27
35
. https://doi.org/10.3141/2005-04
23.
Kumar
,
V. V.
,
Saride
S.
, and
Zornberg
J. G.
.
2021
. “
Mechanical Response of Full-Scale Geosynthetic-Reinforced Asphalt Overlays Subjected to Repeated Loads
.”
Transportation Geotechnics
30
(
September
): 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100617
24.
Kumar
,
V. V.
,
Roodi
G. H.
,
Subramanian
S.
, and
Zornberg
J. G.
.
2022
. “
Influence of Asphalt Thickness on Performance of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Asphalt: Full-Scale Field Study
.”
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
50
, no. 
5
(October):
1052
1059
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.06.005
25.
Locander
,
R.
2009
.
Analysis of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) as a Base Course Material. Report No. CDOT-2009-5
.
Denver, CO
:
Colorado Department of Transportation
.
26.
MacGregor
,
J. A. C.
,
Highter
W. H.
, and
DeGroot
D. J.
.
1999
. “
Structural Numbers for Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Base and Subbase Course Mixes
.”
Transportation Research Record
1687
, no. 
1
(January):
22
28
. https://doi.org/10.3141/1687-03
27.
Marienfeld
,
M.
n.d. “
Trends and Advances in Geosynthetic Interlayers
.”
Paper presented at the Purdue Road School 2020 Presentations
,
West Lafayette, IN
, March 10–11, 2020.
28.
Marín-Uribe
,
C. R.
and
Restrepo-Tamayo
L. M.
.
2022
. “
Experimental Study of the Tensile Strength of Hot Asphalt Mixtures Measured with Indirect Tensile and Semi-circular Bending Tests
.”
Construction and Building Materials
339
(
July
): 127651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127651
29.
MoRTH
2013
.
Specifications for Roads and Bridge Works (Fifth Revision)
.
New Delhi, India
:
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Indian Road Congress
.
30.
Mousa
,
E.
,
El-Badawy
S.
, and
Azam
A.
.
2021
. “
Evaluation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement as Base/Subbase Material in Egypt
.”
Transportation Geotechnics
26
(
January
): 100414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100414
31.
NAPA.
2019
.
Asphalt Pavement Industry Survey on Recycled Materials and Warm-Mix Asphalt Usage: 2018–2019
.
Washington, DC
:
National Asphalt Pavement Association
.
32.
Plati
,
C.
and
Cliatt
B.
.
2018
. “
A Sustainability Perspective for Unbound Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) as a Pavement Base Material
.”
Sustainability (Basel)
11
, no. 
1
(January): 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010078
33.
Saride
,
S.
and
Kumar
V. V.
.
2019
. “
Reflection Crack Assessment Using Digital Image Analysis
.” In
Frontiers in Geotechnical Engineering, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering
, edited by
Latha
G. M.
,
139
156
.
Singapore
:
Springer
.
34.
Saride
,
S.
,
Avirneni
D.
, and
Javvadi
S. C. P.
.
2016
. “
Utilization of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements in Indian Low-Volume Roads
.”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
28
, no. 
2
(February): 04015107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001374
35.
Shu
,
X.
,
Huang
B.
,
Shrum
E. D.
, and
Jia
X.
.
2012
. “
Laboratory Evaluation of Moisture Susceptibility of Foamed Warm Mix Asphalt Containing High Percentages of RAP
.”
Construction and Building Materials
35
(October):
125
130
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.095
36.
Singh
,
D.
,
Chitragar
S. F.
, and
Ashish
P. K.
.
2017
. “
Comparison of Moisture and Fracture Damage Resistance of Hot and Warm Asphalt Mixes Containing Reclaimed Pavement Materials
.”
Construction and Building Materials
157
(December):
1145
1153
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.176
37.
Solatiyan
,
E.
,
Bueche
N.
, and
Carter
A.
.
2020
. “
A Review on Mechanical Behavior and Design Considerations for Reinforced-Rehabilitated Bituminous Pavements
.”
Construction and Building Materials
257
(October): 119483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119483
38.
Soleimanbeigi
,
A.
,
Ozocak
A.
,
Li
B.
,
Akmaz
E.
,
Dayioglu
A. Y.
,
Tanyu
B. F.
,
Aydilek
A. H.
, and
Likos
W. J.
.
2022
. “
Mechanical and Hydraulic Compatibility of RAP with Geosynthetics Used in MSE Walls
.”
Geosynthetics International
29
, no. 
1
(February):
1
18
. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00016
39.
Tran
,
N. H.
,
Julian
G.
,
Taylor
A. J.
,
Willis
R.
, and
Hunt
D.
.
2012
. “
Effect of Geosynthetic Material in Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement on Performance Properties of Asphalt Mixtures
.”
Transportation Research Record
2294
, no. 
1
(January):
26
33
. https://doi.org/10.3141/2294-03
40.
TxDOT.
2014
.
Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets, and Bridges
.
Austin, TX
:
Texas Department of Transportation
.
41.
Wu
,
M.
,
Wen
H.
,
Balasingam
M.
, and
Manahiloh
K. N.
.
2012
. “
Influence of Recycled Asphalt Pavement Content on Air Void Distribution, Permeability, and Modulus of Base Layer
.”
Transportation Research Record
2267
, no. 
1
(January):
65
71
. https://doi.org/10.3141/2267-07
42.
Zhao
,
S.
,
Huang
B.
,
Shu
X.
, and
Woods
M.
.
2013
. “
Comparative Evaluation of Warm Mix Asphalt Containing High Percentages of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
.”
Construction and Building Materials
44
(
July
):
92
100
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.010
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.