Abstract

In geotechnical engineering applications, flexible piezoresistive sensors (also known as tactile pressure sensors) have been commonly used to measure soil contact stress at solid boundaries. However, studies have rarely discussed the performance of this kind of sensor against various calibration methods in granular soils. This study reviewed and evaluated various calibration methods about the application of puck and methods of sensor conditioning. The performance of a point-type piezoresistive sensor installed in an oedometer cell to measure static stresses was assessed through several sensor performance measures, including repeatability, short- and long-term drifts, hysteresis, and accuracy. The effects of soil particle size, soil density, and puck material (hence stiffness) on these measures were also investigated. Results show that the puck application improved the sensor’s short- and long-term drifts and eliminated the stress dependency of the drift, whereas conditioning before every use improved the sensor’s repeatability. Moreover, the data analysis showed that it is important to use the same material that will be used in the testing phase to perform calibration to improve the measurement accuracy. A new term, puck-soil stiffness ratio, is proposed to explain the effects of puck thickness and stiffness on the sensor response because of arching and stress concentrations developed in soil. Reducing soil particle size (D50), with respect to the sensor diameter (Dsens), significantly improved repeatability and drift errors. At a high Dsens/D50 ratio, the sensor performance was independent of soil density.

References

1.
Agusti
,
G. C.
and
Sitar
N.
.
2013
.
Seismic Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures in Cohesive Backfills, Report No. UCB GT 13-02
.
Sacramento, CA
:
California Department of Transportation, Engineering Service Center
.
2.
Al Atik
,
N.
and
Sitar
N.
.
2007
.
Development of Improved Procedures for Seismic Design of Buried and Partially Buried Structures, PEER Report 2007/06
.
Berkeley, CA
:
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California
.
3.
Al Atik
,
N.
and
Sitar
N.
.
2010
. “
Seismic Earth Pressures on Cantilever Retaining Structures
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
136
, no. 
10
(October):
1324
1333
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000351
4.
Ashruf
,
C. M. A.
2002
. “
Thin Flexible Pressure Sensors
.”
Sensor Review
22
, no. 
4
(December):
322
327
. https://doi.org/10.1108/02602280210444636
5.
ASTM International.
2000
.
Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)
. ASTM D2487-00.
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved March 10,
2000
. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-00
6.
Bertetto
,
A. M.
and
Meili
S.
.
2012
. “
Static and Low Frequency Evaluation of a Thin-Film Contact Force Sensor
.”
International Journal of Mechanics and Control
13
, no. 
2
(January):
107
111
.
7.
Brimacombe
,
J. M.
,
Wilson
D. R.
,
Hodgson
A. J.
,
Ho
K. C. T.
, and
Anglin
C.
.
2009
. “
Effect of Calibration Method on Tekscan Sensor Accuracy
.”
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
131
, no. 
3
(March): 034503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3005165
8.
Canavese
,
G.
,
Stassi
S.
,
Fallauto
C.
,
Corbellini
S.
,
Cauda
V.
,
Camarchia
V.
,
Pirola
M.
, and
Pirri
C. F.
.
2014
. “
Piezoresistive Flexible Composite for Robotic Tactile Applications
.”
Sensors and Actuators A, Physical
208
(February):
1
9
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2013.11.018
9.
Chow
,
J. K.
,
Wang
Y.-H.
,
Liu
H. L.
, and
Huang
E.
.
2020
. “
Determination of Consolidation Parameters Based on the Excess Pore Water Pressure Measurement Using a Newly Developed U-Oedometer
.”
Acta Geotechnica
15
, no. 
9
(February):
2665
2680
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00914-y
10.
Dashti
,
S.
,
Gillis
K.
,
Ghayoomi
M.
, and
Hashash
Y.
.
2012
. “
Sensing of Lateral Seismic Earth Pressures in Geotechnical Centrifuge Modeling
.” In
15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
,
1
10
.
Lisbon, Portugal
:
Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sísmica (SPES)
.
11.
Ding
,
S.
,
Han
B.
,
Dong
X.
,
Yu
X.
,
Ni
Y.
,
Zheng
Q.
, and
Ou
J.
.
2017
. “
Pressure-Sensitive Behaviors, Mechanisms and Model of Field Assisted Quantum Tunneling Composites
.”
Polymer
113
(March):
105
118
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.058
12.
Dunnicliff
,
J.
1988
.
Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Field Performance
.
New York
:
John Wiley and Sons
.
13.
El Ganainy
,
H.
,
Tessari
A.
,
Abdoun
T.
, and
Sasanakul
I.
.
2014
. “
Tactile Pressure Sensors in Centrifuge Testing
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
37
, no. 
1
(January):
151
163
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120061
14.
Ferguson-Pell
,
M.
,
Hagisawa
S.
, and
Bain
D.
.
2000
. “
Evaluation of a Sensor for Low Interface Pressure Applications
.”
Medical Engineering & Physics
22
, no. 
9
(November):
657
663
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(00)00080-1
15.
Fong
,
F. K.
Towards the Development of a Sensor for Measuring Soil Stresses in the Cyclic Simple Shear Apparatus
.” Master’s thesis,
University of Toronto
,
2019
.
16.
Gao
,
Y.
and
Wang
Y. H.
.
2013
. “
Calibration of Tactile Pressure Sensors for Measuring Stress in Soils
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
36
, no. 
4
(May):
568
574
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120143
17.
Gao
,
Y.
and
Wang
Y. H.
.
2014
. “
Experimental and DEM Examinations of K0 in Sand under Different Loading Conditions
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
140
, no. 
5
(May): 04014012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001095
18.
Gao
,
Y.
,
Wang
Y.-H.
, and
Chow
J. K.
.
2017
. “
Application of Film-Like Sensors for K0 and Pore Water Pressure Measurement in Clay during 1D Consolidation
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
40
, no. 
1
(January):
134
143
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160008
19.
Gillis
,
K.
,
Dashti
S.
, and
Hashash
Y. M. A.
.
2015
. “
Dynamic Calibration of Tactile Sensors for Measurement of Soil Pressures in Centrifuge
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
38
, no. 
3
(May):
261
274
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140184
20.
Ha
,
D.
,
Abdoun
T. H.
,
O’Rourke
M. J.
,
Symans
M. D.
,
O’Rourke
T. D.
,
Palmer
M. C.
, and
Stewart
H. E.
.
2008
. “
Centrifuge Modeling of Earthquake Effects on Buried High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipelines Crossing Fault Zones
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
134
, no. 
10
(October):
1501
1515
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1501)
21.
Hashash
,
Y. M. A.
,
Dashti
S.
,
Musgrove
M.
,
Gillis
K.
,
Walker
M.
,
Ellison
K.
, and
Basarah
Y. I.
.
2018
. “
Influence of Tall Buildings on Seismic Response of Shallow Underground Structures
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
144
, no. 
12
(December): 04018097. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001963
22.
Hollinger
,
A.
and
Wanderley
M. C.
.
2006
. “
Evaluation of Commercial Force-Sensing Resistors
.” In
International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression
,
4
8
.
Paris
:
IRCAM-Centre Pompidou
.
23.
Hushmand
,
A.
,
Dashti
S.
,
Zhang
M.
,
McCartney
J. S.
,
Ghayoomi
M.
,
Hushmand
B.
,
Mokarram
N.
,
Davis
C.
,
Lee
Y.
, and
Hu
J.
.
2014
. “
Seismic Soil-Structure-Interaction and Lateral Earth Pressures on Buried Reservoir Structures
.” In
Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers
,
1215
1224
.
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.118
24.
Ishihara
,
K.
1993
. “
Liquefaction and Flow Failure during Earthquakes
.”
Geotechnique
43
, no. 
3
(September):
351
451
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351
25.
Jaky
,
J.
1944
. “
The Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest. [A nyugalmi nyomas tenyezoje]
.”
Journal of the Society of Hungarian Architects and Engineers
72
, no. 
22
:
355
358
.
26.
Kalantari
,
M.
,
Dargahi
J.
,
Kövecses
J.
,
Ghanbari Mardasi
M.
, and
Nouri
S.
.
2012
. “
A New Approach for Modeling Piezoresistive Force Sensors Based on Semiconductive Polymer Composites
.”
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
17
, no. 
3
(June):
572
581
. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2011.2108664
27.
Komi
,
E. R.
,
Roberts
J. R.
, and
Rothberg
S. J.
.
2007
. “
Evaluation of Thin, Flexible Sensors for Time-Resolved Grip Force Measurement
.”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
221
, no. 
12
(December):
1687
1699
. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES700
28.
Krivopal
,
B.
n.d. Pressure sensitive ink means, and methods of use. U.S. Patent 5,989,700, filed January 5,
1996
, and issued November 23,
1999
.
29.
Labuz
,
J. F.
and
Theroux
B.
.
2005
. “
Laboratory Calibration of Earth Pressure Cells
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
28
, no. 
2
(January):
188
196
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ12089
30.
Lee
,
S. J.
,
Seo
Y.
, and
Kim
Y. R.
.
2006
. “
Validation of Material-Level Performance Models: Using the Third-Scale Model Mobile Loading Simulator
.”
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
1949
, no. 
1
(January):
74
82
. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0361198106194900107
31.
Liu
,
K. Y.
,
Xu
C. S.
, and
Zhang
X.
.
2021
. “
Measurement Performance Evaluation of Tactile Pressure Sensor with Different Particle Sizes and Sensor Curvatures
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
44
, no. 
4
(July):
1036
1054
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20200028
32.
Mayne
,
P. W.
and
Kulhawy
F. H.
.
1982
. “
K0–OCR Relationship in Soil
.”
Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division
108
, no. 
6
(June):
851
872
. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001306
33.
Mikola
,
R. G.
,
Candia
G.
, and
Sitar
N.
.
2016
. “
Seismic Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures and Basement Walls in Cohesionless Soils
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
142
, no. 
10
(October): 04016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001507
34.
Moss
,
R. E. S.
and
Noche
R. E.
.
2012
. “
Scale Model Shake Table Testing of Seismic Earth Pressures in Soft Clay
.” In
GeoCongress 2012
,
2078
2087
.
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412121.213
35.
Muszynski
,
M. R.
,
Olson
S. M.
,
Hashash
Y. M. A.
, and
Phillips
C.
.
2016
. “
Earth Pressure Measurements Using Tactile Pressure Sensors in a Saturated Sand during Static and Dynamic Centrifuge Testing
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
39
, no. 
3
(May):
371
390
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150049
36.
Oreper
,
B.
and
Brenneman
J.
. n.d. Pressure sensor. U.S. Patent 6,272,936 B1, filed February 20,
1998
, and issued August 14,
2001
.
37.
Paikowsky
,
S. G.
and
Hajduk
E. L.
.
1997
. “
Calibration and Use of Grid-Based Tactile Pressure Sensors in Granular Material
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
20
, no. 
2
(June):
218
241
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10741J
38.
Paikowsky
,
S. G.
,
Palmer
C. J.
, and
Rolwes
L. E.
.
2006
. “
The Use of Tactile Sensor Technology for Measuring Soil Stress Distribution
.” In
GeoCongress 2006
,
1
6
.
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
. https://doi.org/10.1061/40803(187)79
39.
Palmer
,
M. C.
,
O’Rourke
T. D.
,
Olson
N. A.
,
Abdoun
T.
,
Ha
D.
, and
O’Rourke
M. J.
.
2009
. “
Tactile Pressure Sensors for Soil-Structure Interaction Assessment
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
135
, no. 
11
(November):
1638
1645
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000143
40.
Puppala
,
A. J.
,
Wejrungsikul
T.
,
Puljan
V.
, and
Manosuthikij
T.
.
2012
. “
Measurements of Shrinkage Induced Pressure (SIP) in Unsaturated Expansive Clays
.”
Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA
43
, no. 
1
(March):
40
47
.
41.
Sagario
,
M. L. Q.
and
Ooi
P. S. K.
.
2011
. “
Assessing the Compactability of Recycled Concrete Aggregate
.”
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
2253
, no. 
1
(January):
10
21
. https://doi.org/10.3141/2253-02
42.
Schofield
,
J. S.
,
Evans
K. R.
,
Hebert
J. S.
,
Marasco
P. D.
, and
Carey
J. P.
.
2016
. “
The Effect of Biomechanical Variables on Force Sensitive Resistor Error: Implications for Calibration and Improved Accuracy
.”
Journal of Biomechanics
49
, no. 
5
(March):
786
792
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.022
43.
Shang
,
S.
,
Yue
Y.
, and
Wang
X.
.
2016
. “
Piezoresistive Strain Sensing of Carbon Black/Silicone Composites above Percolation Threshold
.”
Review of Scientific Instruments
87
, no. 
12
(December): 123910. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4973274
44.
Shaw
,
A. J.
,
Davis
B. A.
,
Collins
M. J.
, and
Carney
L. G.
.
2009
. “
A Technique to Measure Eyelid Pressure Using Piezoresistive Sensors
.”
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
56
, no. 
10
(October):
2512
2517
. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2022550
45.
Swanson
,
E. C.
,
Weathersby
E. J.
,
Cagle
J. C.
, and
Sanders
J. E.
.
2019
. “
Evaluation of Force Sensing Resistors for the Measurement of Interface Pressures in Lower Limb Prosthetics
.”
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
141
, no. 
10
(October): 101009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043561
46.
Talesnick
,
M.
2005
. “
Measuring Soil Contact Pressure on a Solid Boundary and Quantifying Soil Arching
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
28
, no. 
2
(March):
171
179
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ12484
47.
Talesnick
,
M. L.
2016
. “
Discussion of ‘Effect of Overconsolidation on K0 in Centrifuge Models Using CPT and Tactile Pressure Sensor’ by W. El-Sekelly, T. Abdoun, and R. Dobry. Published in Geotechnical Testing Journal 38, no. 2 (2015), 150–165
.”
Geotechnical Journal
39
, no. 
2
(March):
340
342
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150175
48.
Tekscan.
2001
.
FlexiForce FAQ’s: Frequently Asked Questions
.
Boston, MA
:
Tekscan, Inc
.
49.
Tekscan.
2010
. “
High-Temp FlexiForce ‘Story behind the Story’ by Electronic Products
.” Tekscan, Inc. http://web.archive.org/web/20220516031905/https://www.tekscan.com/news/high-temp-flexiforce-story-behind-story-electronic-products
50.
Tekscan.
2015
.
FlexiForce Quickstart Board (Rev B)
.
South Boston, MA
:
Tekscan, Inc
.
51.
Tekscan.
2017
. “
Civil/Geotechnical Engineering Pressure Measurement
.”
Tekscan, Inc
. http://web.archive.org/web/20220516032457/https://www.tekscan.com/applications/civilgeotechnical-engineering-pressure-measurement
52.
Tekscan.
2019
.
ELF & WELF 2 User Manual Version 4.3x (Rev P)
. South Boston, MA:
Tekscan, Inc
.
53.
Tekscan.
2020
a.
Best Practices in Mechanical Integration of the FlexiForce Sensor
.
South Boston, MA
:
Tekscan, Inc
.
54.
Tekscan.
2020
b.
FlexiForce Standard Model A401 Datasheet
.
South Boston, MA
:
Tekscan, Inc
.
55.
Tekscan
2021
.
FlexiForce Integration Guide: Edition 2
.
South Boston, MA.
:
Tekscan, Inc
.
56.
Tory
,
A. C.
and
Sparrow
R. W.
.
1967
. “
The Influence of Diaphragm Flexibility on the Performance of an Earth Pressure Cell
.”
Journal of Scientific Instruments
44
, no. 
9
(October):
781
785
. https://doi.org/10.1088/0950-7671/44/9/333
57.
Weiler
,
W. A.
and
Kulhawy
F. H.
.
1982
. “
Factors Affecting Stress Cell Measurements in Soil
.”
Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division
108
, no. 
12
(December):
1529
1548
.
58.
Whelan
,
M. J.
and
Janoyan
K. D.
.
2006
. “
Interface Granular Force Measurement Using Tactile Sensors
.” In
GeoCongress 2006
,
1
4
.
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
. https://doi.org/10.1061/40803(187)82
59.
Yamashita
,
S.
,
Jamiolkowski
M.
, and
Lo Presti
D. C. F.
.
2000
. “
Stiffness Nonlinearity of Three Sands
.”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
126
, no. 
10
(October):
929
938
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:10(929)
60.
Yao
,
H.
,
Yang
W.
,
Cheng
W.
,
Tan
Y. J.
,
See
H. H.
,
Li
S.
,
Ali
H. P. A.
,
Lim
B. Z. H.
,
Liu
Z.
, and
Tee
B. C. K.
.
2020
. “
Near–Hysteresis-Free Soft Tactile Electronic Skins for Wearables and Reliable Machine Learning
.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
117
, no. 
41
(October):
25352
25359
. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010989117
61.
Żarkiewicz
,
K.
2019
. “
Lateral Stress Changes along the Pile Skin during Axial Loading in Laboratory Test
.” In
Proceedings of the XVII ECSMGE-2019
,
1
8
.
London
:
International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnial Engineering
. https://doi.org/10.32075/17ECSMGE-2019-0843
62.
Zhang
,
X.-W.
,
Pan
Y.
,
Zheng
Q.
, and
Yi
X.
.
2000
. “
Time Dependence of Piezoresistance for the Conductor-Filled Polymer Composites
.”
Journal of Polymer Science. Part B, Polymer Physics
38
, no. 
21
(November):
2739
2749
. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0488(20001101)38:21<2739::AID-POLB40>3.0.CO;2-O
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.