Abstract

This experimental study addresses the effect of membrane and filter paper on measurements of deviator stress by performing triaxial compression tests on gelatin, silicon, and Speswhite clay specimens. The magnitude of this effect is assessed at large strains close to the critical state conditions for soft soils with an undrained shear strength ranging up to 40 kPa. This study shows that the corrections for the membrane and filter paper effect, given by ASTM and BS, can lead to a significant overestimation of the correction required when applied to typical values for deviator stress found in tests on soft soils. Particularly at large strains the correction associated with the presence of membrane and filter paper, according to ASTM and BS, can be more than half of the material’s undrained shear strength. This study also demonstrates that for soft specimens, the membrane correction is strain level–dependent and can be predicted by taking into account the buckling state of the membrane during shearing. In addition, the strength contributed by the membrane is found to be independent of cell pressure but greatly affected by the friction between the tested specimen and membrane. Furthermore, the correction for filter paper is shown to depend primarily on the wetting of the filter paper strips, and to a lesser extent on their orientation. The combination of wet and oblique filter paper strips is the most effective way of making accurate measurements of deviator stress. This results in a filter paper correction that can be as low as 1 kPa, irrespective of the strain level. Finally, alternative expressions for the membrane and filter paper corrections to be used in the triaxial testing of soft soils are presented herein.

References

1.
ASTM International.
2011
.
Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils
. ASTM D4767-11.
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved 2011. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4767-11
2.
Baldi
,
G.
and
Nova
,
R.
1984
. “
Membrane Penetration Effects in Triaxial Testing
.”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
110
, no. 
3
:
403
420
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:3(403)
3.
Baxter
,
D. Y.
Mechanical Behavior of Soil-Bentonite Cutoff Walls
.” PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg,
2000
.
4.
Bishop
,
A. W.
and
Henkel
,
D. J.
1962
.
The Measurement of Soil Properties in the Triaxial Test
.
London
:
Edward Arnold
.
5.
British Standards Institution.
1990
.
Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes. Shear Strength Tests (Effective Stress)
(Withdrawn/Superseded). BS 1377-8:1990.
London, UK
, approved October 1990.
6.
DeGroff
,
W.
,
Donaghe
,
R.
,
Lade
,
P.V.
, and
La Rochelle
,
P.
1988
. “
Correction of Strength for Membrane Effects in the Triaxial Test
.”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
11
, no. 
1
:
78
82
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10179J
7.
Della
,
N.
,
Belkhatir
,
M.
,
Henni
,
A. D.
,
Canou
,
J.
, and
Dupla
,
J. C.
2014
. “
Laboratory Assessment of Saturation and Sample Molding Effects on Shear Resistance and Mechanical Characteristics of Sandy Soil
.”
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
7
, no. 
8
,
2969
2980
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1046-7
8.
Duncan
,
J. M.
and
Seed
,
H. B.
1967
. “
Correction for Strength Test Data
.”
J Soil Mech Found Div
93
, no. 
5
,
121
137
.
9.
Farrell
,
E. R.
and
Hebib
,
S.
1998
. “
The Determination of Geotechnical Parameters of Organic Soils
.” In
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Problematic Soils
,
33
36
.
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
:
A. A. Balkema
.
10.
Frydman
,
S.
,
Zeitlen
,
J.
, and
Alpan
,
I.
1973
. “
The Membrane Effect in Triaxial Testing of Granular Materials
.”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
1
, no. 
1
,
37
41
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE11599J
11.
Gens
,
A.
Stress-Strain and Strength Characteristics of a Low Plasticity Clay
.” PhD thesis,
University of London
,
1982
.
12.
Greeuw
,
G.
,
den Adel
,
H.
,
Schapers
,
A. L.
, and
den Haan
,
E. J.
2001
. “
Reduction of Axial Resistance Due to Membrane and Side Drains
.” In
Soft Ground Technology
,
30
42
.
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
.
13.
Head
,
K. H.
1998
.
Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing: Effective Stress Tests
.
Hoboken, NJ
:
Wiley
.
14.
Henkel
,
D. J.
and
Gilbert
,
G. D.
1952
. “
The Effect Measured of the Rubber Membrane on the Triaxial Compression Strength of Clay Samples
.”
Géotechnique
3
, no. 
1
:
20
29
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1952.3.1.20
15.
Jastrzębska
,
M.
and
Kowalska
,
M.
2016
. “
Triaxial Tests on Weak Cohesive Soils – Some Practical Remarks (Part 2)
.”
Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
9
, no. 
3
:
81
93
.
16.
Kowalska
,
M.
2012
. “
Influence of Loading History and Boundary Conditions on Parameters of Soil Constitutive Models
.”
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
34
, no. 
1
:
15
33
. https://doi.org/10.1515/sgem-2017-0020
17.
La Rochelle
,
P.
,
Trak
,
B.
,
Tavenas
,
F.
, and
Roy
,
M.
1974
. “
Failure of a Test Embankment on a Sensitive Champlain Clay Deposit
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
11
, no. 
1
:
142
164
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t74-009
18.
La Rochelle
,
P.
,
Leroueil
,
S.
,
Trak
,
B.
,
Blais-Leroux
,
L.
, and
Tavenas
,
F.
1988
. “
Observational Approach to Membrane and Area Corrections in Triaxial Tests
.” In
Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock
, edited by
Donaghe
R. T.
,
Chaney
R. C.
, and
Silver
M. L.
,
715
731
.
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP29110S
19.
Olson
,
R. E.
and
Kiefer
,
M. L.
1964
. “
Effect of Lateral Filter Drains on the Triaxial Shear Characteristics of Soils
.” In
Laboratory Shear Testing of Soil
,
482
491
.
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP30025S
20.
Raghunandan
,
M. E.
2012
. “
Effect of Soil Layering on the Ground Response Parameters: A Parametric Study
.”
Natural Hazards
63
, no. 
2
,
1115
1128
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0208-3
21.
Raghunandan
,
M. E.
,
Sharma
,
J. S.
, and
Pradhan
,
B.
2015
. “
A Review on the Effect of Rubber Membrane in Triaxial Tests
.”
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
8
, no. 
5
,
3195
3206
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1420-0
22.
Sandroni
,
S. S.
The Strength of London Clay in Total and Effective Stress Terms
.” PhD thesis,
University of London
,
1977
.
23.
Tokimatsu
,
K.
and
Nakamura
,
K.
1987
. “
A Simple Correction for Membrane Compliance in Liquefaction Tests
.”
Soils Found
27
, no. 
4
,
111
122
.
24.
Trak
,
B.
,
LaRochelle
,
P.
,
Tavenas
,
F.
,
Leroueil
,
S.
, and
Roy
,
M.
1980
. “
A New Approach to the Stability Analysis of Embankments on Sensitive Clays
.”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
17
, no. 
4
,
526
544
.
25.
Wesley
,
L. D.
Influence of Stress Path and Anisotropy on the Behaviour of a Soft Alluvial Clay
.” PhD thesis,
University of London
,
1975
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.