Abstract

The rapid soils analysis kit uses a coffee grinder to break apart aggregated soil particles in fine-grained soils. This leads to the question of potential particle cutting or breaking due to the grinder. Hence, we performed a laboratory investigation to determine if the use of a coffee grinder to break apart aggregated soil particles produces fines from cutting or breaking sand-size and smaller particles and whether the production of more fines sometimes changes the USCS classification by some combination of adding soil fines and altering the Atterberg limits. Processing Ottawa Sand for 90 s in a coffee grinder established that the coffee grinder breaks down sand particles into fines. A silty sand (SM) sand was tested in the same way and the fines content increased significantly. Several tests were performed on fine-grained soils, and no significant increase in fines due to processing in the coffee grinder was noted. The Atterberg limits of all soils tested changed little due to processing with the grinder. In particular, the plastic limit was not changed by more than 2 (% water content). Several recommendations were made for potential future investigations.

References

1.
ASTM D422-63(
2007
)e2:
Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, www.astm.org.
2.
Berney
,
E.
and
Wahl
,
R.
,
2008
, “
A Rapid Soils Analysis Kit, United States Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research and Development Center
,” Report No. ERDC/GSL TR 08-3,
ERDC
, Vicksburg, MS.
3.
Dawson
,
R.
,
1959
,
Laboratory Manual in Soil Mechanics
, 2nd ed.,
Pitman
,
NY
.
4.
Eid
,
H. T.
,
2006
, “
Factors Influencing Determination of Shale Classification Indices and Their Correlation to Mechanical Properties
,”
Geotech. Geol. Eng.
, Vol.
24
, No.
6
, pp.
1695
1713
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-5726-2
5.
Kayabali
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Determination of Consistency Limits: A Comparison Between –#40 and –#200 Materials
,”
Electron. J. Geotech. Eng.
, Vol.
16
, pp.
1547
1561
, http://www.ejge.com/2011/Ppr11.172/Ppr11.172alr.pdf (Last accessed 29 July 2015).
6.
LaGatta
,
D. P.
,
1970
, “
Residual Strength of Clay and Clay-Shales by Rotation Shear Tests
,”
Contract Report S-70-5
,
U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station
,
Vicksburg, MS.
7.
Lade
,
P. V.
and
Nejadi-Babadai
,
H.
,
1976
, “
Soil Drying by Microwave Oven
,”
Soil Specimen Preparation for Laboratory Testing, ASTM STP 599
,
Sangrey
D. A.
and
Mitchell
R. J.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
320
340
.
8.
Stark
,
T.
and
Eid
,
H. T.
,
1994
, “
Drained Residual Strength of Cohesive Soils
,”
ASCE J. Geotech. Eng.
, Vol.
120
, No.
5
, pp.
856
887
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:5(856)
9.
Taha
,
M. R.
,
2009
, “
Geotechnical Properties of Soil-Ball Milled Soil Mixtures
,”
Nanotechnology in Construction, Vol. 3, Proceedings of NICOM 3
,
Bittner
Z.
,
Bartos
P. J. M.
,
Memecek
J.
,
Smilauer
V.
, and
Zeman
J.
, Eds.,
Springer
,
New York
, pp.
377
382
.
10.
Townsend
,
F. C.
and
Gilbert
,
P. A.
,
1975
, “
Effects of Specimen Type on the Residual Strength of Clays and Clay Shales
,”
Soil Specimen Preparation for Laboratory Testing, ASTM STP 599
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
43
65
.
11.
U.S. Army
,
1992
, “
U.S. Army Technical Manual
,” TM
3-34.64 (FM 5-410/23 Dec 1992)/MCRP 3-17.7G
,
Military Soils Engineering
,
Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.
12.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
,
1986
,
Engineer Manual: EM1110-2-1106
,
Laboratory Soils Testing, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
,
Washington, D.C
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.