Abstract

Ground settlement and relevant prediction methods related to underground tunneling have been investigated extensively in previous studies. However, the effects of the existence of service pipelines on the ground movement induced by tunneling have not been well addressed. This study involved a series of physical modeling tests on ground responses to tunneling in sand considering the existence of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes using a custom-made physical modeling system. The system included a model box, a pipe fixing frame, and a number of settlement plates. The developed model box had dimensions of 2.0 m by 2.0 m by 1.5 m, and the bottom of the box consisted of eight movable plates with dimensions of 0.25 m by 2 m by 0.1 m. The plates were lowered down at four levels of maximum vertical distance (10, 20, 30, and 40 mm) to form normal distribution curves, simulating tunneling effects in the sand stratum. Four normal distribution curves were created with maximum lowering distances of the movable plates of 10, 20, 30, and 40 mm to simulate different volumes of ground loss in the tunnel. We performed the four tests one after another by successively lowering down the movable bottom plates. Prior to filling, the required density of backfilled sand was determined using a self-designed instrument. The HDPE pipes, with two diameters (i.e., 300 and 200 mm), were installed in the model box at two different buried depths (i.e., 1.05 and 0.75 m from the spring line of the pipes to the fill surface) using a custom-made fixing frame. The test results demonstrate that the existence of the HDPE pipes resulted in a wider but shallower settlement trough than in the greenfield (without pipe) case. The width of the settlement trough at a given depth decreased with decreasing buried depth of the pipe, whereas it increased with decreasing pipe diameter. The volume of the settlement trough at a given depth was approximately constant, regardless of the existence of pipes, and the vertical displacement of the pipes increased with decreasing diameter and buried depth of the pipe.

References

1.
Ahmed
,
M.
and
Iskander
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Analysis of Tunneling-induced Ground Movements Using Transparent Soil Models
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
, Vol.
137
, No.
5
, pp.
525
535
.
2.
Aoyagi
,
T.
,
1995
, “
Representing Settlement for Soft Ground Tunneling
,” M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
3.
ASTM A53M-12,
2012
:
Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-dipped, Zinc-coated, Welded and Seamless
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
4.
ASTM C118M-11,
2011
:
Standard Specification for Concrete Pipe for Irrigation or Drainage (Metric)
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
5.
ASTM D2412-11,
2011
:
Standard Test Method for Determination of External Loading Characteristics of Plastic Pipe by Parallel-plate Loading
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
6.
ASTM D2487-11,
2011
:
Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purpose
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
7.
ASTM D3080-11,
2011
:
Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
8.
ASTM D4253-06,
2006
:
Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
9.
Attewell
,
P. B.
,
Yeates
,
J.
, and
Selby
,
A. R.
,
1986
,
Soil Movements Induced by Tunnelling and Their Effects on Pipelines and Structures
,
Blackie
,
Glasgow, Scotland
.
10.
Bracegirdle
,
A.
,
Mair
,
R. J.
,
Nyren
,
R. J.
, and
Taylor
,
R. N.
,
1996
, “
Criteria for the Estimation of Damage to Services Caused by Ground Movements Arising from Tunneling
,”
Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground
,
Mair
and
R. J.
Taylor
R. N.
, Eds.,
Balkema
,
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
, pp.
653
658
.
11.
Cresswell
,
A.
,
Barton
,
M. E.
, and
Brown
,
R.
,
1999
, “
Determining the Maximum Density of Sands by Pluviation
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
, Vol.
22
, No.
4
, pp.
324
328
.
12.
Duan
,
G. J.
,
2002
, “
Study on the Settlement at Ground Surface Due to Tunneling and Its Effects on the Pipeline Behaviors
,” Ph.D. dissertation, China University of Geoscience, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
13.
Jacobsz
,
S. W.
,
Standing
,
J. R.
,
Mair
,
R. J.
,
Hagiwara
,
T.
, and
Sugiyama
,
T.
,
2004
, “
Centrifuge Modeling of Tunneling Near Driven Piles
,”
Soils Found.
, Vol.
44
, No.
1
, pp.
49
56
.
14.
Klar
,
A.
,
Marshall
,
A. M.
,
Soga
,
K.
, and
Mair
,
R. J.
,
2008
, “
Tunneling Effects on Jointed Pipelines
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
45
, No.
1
, pp.
131
139
.
15.
Klar
,
A.
,
Vorster
,
T. E. B.
,
Soga
,
K.
, and
Mair
,
R. J.
,
2005
, “
Soil–Pipe–Tunnel Interaction: Comparison between Winkler and Elastic Continuum Solutions
,”
Geotechnique
, Vol.
55
, No.
6
, pp.
461
466
.
16.
Liao
,
S. M.
and
Liu
,
J. H.
,
1997
, “
Protection Technologies of Structures and Facilities Around Excavation
,”
Guideline of Excavation
,
China Architecture and Building Press
,
Beijing, China
(in Chinese).
17.
Loganathan
,
N.
and
Poulos
,
H. G.
,
1998
, “
Analytical Prediction for Tunneling-Induced Ground Movements in Clays
,”
ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
, Vol.
124
, No.
9
, pp.
846
856
.
18.
Mair
,
R. J.
,
2008
, “
Tunnelling and Geotechnics: New Horizons
,”
Geotechnique
, Vol.
58
, No.
9
, pp.
695
736
.
19.
Mair
,
R. J.
,
Taylor
,
R. N.
, and
Bracegirdle
,
A.
,
1993
, “
Subsurface Settlement Profiles Above Tunnels in Clays
,”
Geotechnique
, Vol.
43
, No.
2
, pp.
315
320
.
20.
Marshall
,
A. M.
,
2009
, “
Tunneling in Sand and Its Effect on Pipelines and Piles
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
21.
Marshall
,
A. M.
,
Klar
,
A.
, and
Mair
,
R. J.
,
2010
, “
Tunneling beneath Buried Pipes: View of Soil Strain and Its Effect on Pipeline Behavior
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
, Vol.
136
, No.
12
, pp.
1664
1672
.
22.
Marshall
,
A. M.
and
Mair
,
R. J.
,
2011
, “
Tunneling beneath Driven or Jacked End-bearing Piles in Sand
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
48
, No.
12
, pp.
1757
1771
.
23.
Meguid
,
M. A.
,
Saada
,
O.
,
Nunes
,
M. A.
, and
Mattar
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Physical Modeling of Tunnels in Soft Ground: A Review
,”
Tunnel. Underground Space Technol.
, Vol.
23
, No.
2
, pp.
185
189
.
24.
Moh
,
Z.
,
Ju
,
D. H.
, and
Hwang
,
R. N.
,
1996
, “
Ground Movements around Tunnels in Soft Ground
,”
Proceedings of International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground
,
Mair
and
R.
Taylor
R.
, Eds.,
Balkema
,
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
, pp.
725
730
.
25.
Moore
,
I. D.
and
Hu
,
F.
,
1996
, “
Linear Viscoelastic Modelling of Profiled High Density Polyethylene Pipe
,”
Can. J. Civ. Eng.
, Vol.
23
, No.
2
, pp.
395
407
.
26.
Moore
,
I. D.
and
Zhang
,
C.
,
1998
, “
Nonlinear Predictions for HDPE Pipe Response Under Parallel Plate Loading
,”
J. Transportation Eng.
, Vol.
124
, No.
3
, pp.
286
292
.
27.
O'Reilly
,
M. P.
and
New
,
B. M.
,
1982
, “
Settlements above Tunnels in the UK—Their Magnitude and Prediction
,” M. J. Jones, Ed.,
Proceedings of Tunnelling ‘82
,
IMM
, London, pp.
173
181
.
28.
O'Rourke
,
T. D.
and
Trautmann
,
C. H.
,
1982
, “
Buried Pipeline Response to Tunnel Ground Movements
,”
Proceedings of Europipe ‘82 Conference
,
Basel
, Switzerland, Jan 18–20, pp.
9
15
.
29.
Peck
,
B.
,
1969
, “
Deep Excavations and Tunneling in Soft Ground
,”
Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
, Mexico City, Sociedad Mexicana de Mecanica, de Suelos, Mexico, pp.
225
290
.
30.
Takagi
,
N.
,
Shimamura
,
K.
, and
Nishio
,
N.
,
1984
, “
Buried Pipe Response to Adjacent Ground Movements Associated with Tunneling and Excavations
,”
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ground Movements and Structures
,
Cardiff
, UK, July 9–12, Pentech Press, London, pp.
97
112
.
31.
Vorster
,
T. E. B.
,
2005
, “
The Effects of Tunnelling on Buried Pipes
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
32.
Vorster
,
T. E. B.
,
Klar
,
A.
,
Soga
,
K.
, and
Mair
,
R. J.
,
2005
, “
Estimating the Effects of Tunneling on Existing Pipelines
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
, Vol.
131
, No.
11
, pp.
1399
1410
.
33.
Yeates
,
J.
,
1984
, “
The Response of Buried Pipelines to Ground Movements Caused by Tunnelling in Soil
,”
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ground Movements and Structures
,
Cardiff
, UK, July 9–12, Pentech Press, London, pp.
129
144
.
34.
Zhang
,
C.
and
Moore
,
I. D.
,
1997
, “
Nonlinear Mechanical Response of High Density Polyethylene. Part I: Experimental Investigation and Model Evaluation
,”
Polym. Eng. Sci.
, Vol.
37
, No.
2
, pp.
404
413
.
35.
Zhang
,
Z. G.
,
2009
, “
The Effects of Tunneling on Existing Pipes in Layered Soils
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Tongji University, Shanghai, China (in Chinese).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.