Abstract

This paper presents the results of Swedish fall cone tests and Casagrande liquid limit tests conducted on saline Champlain Sea clay samples from Lachenaie, Quebec. The main objective was to study a few hitherto unanswered practical questions regarding these testing methods. Penetration range is found to affect the Hansbo’s relationship used in fall cone experiments, while the mass and the bluntness degree of the cone have no effect on it. A direct relationship between thixotropic regain in shear strength and sensitivity is found. When measuring the liquid limit, if only the first penetration depth is recorded, results are up to 5 % smaller than those obtained when following the standard procedure of CAN/BNQ-2501-092. With this standard, the average of the first two penetration depths within 0.3 mm of each other is recorded. These penetrations usually follow the bulk of the thixotropic shear strength regain. The Swedish fall cone was compared to the traditional Casagrande apparatus for liquid limit determinations. The two methods yielded identical results in the studied conditions (saline Lachenaie clay with liquid limit between 44% and 75%). An incorrect calibration of the height-of-drop of 1.4 mm led to a mean error of 6 liquid limit points. This error is greater than the theoretical error obtained by assuming that the number of blows is proportional to the square of the height-of-drop.

References

1.
ASTM
D4318,
2011
, “
Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04. 08
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
1
14
.
2.
Atterberg
,
A.
,
1911
, “
The Behavior of Clays with Water, Their Limits of Plasticity and Their Degrees of Plasticity (in Swedish)
,”
K. Lantbruksakademiens Handl. Tidskr.
, Vol.
50
, No.
2
, pp.
132
158
.
3.
Bardet
,
J. P.
,
1997
,
Experimental Soil Mechanics
,
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
4.
Benabdallah
,
E. M.
,
2010
, “
Major Ions and Water Movement in a Champlain Clay Since its Deposition (in French)
,” PhD thesis,
École Polytechnique de Montréal
, Montreal, Canada.
5.
Bauer
,
E. E.
,
1960
, “
History and Development of the Atterberg Limits Tests
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
, Vol.
254
, pp.
160
167
.
6.
Belviso
,
R.
,
Ciampoli
,
S.
,
Cotecchia
,
V.
, and
Federico
,
A.
,
1985
, “
Use of the Cone Penetrometer to Determine Consistency Limits
,”
Ground Eng.
, Vol.
18
, pp.
21
22
.
7.
BSI BS 1377
,
1990
, “
Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes. Part 2: Classification Tests
,”
British Standards Institution (BSI)
,
London
.
8.
Budhu
,
M.
,
1985
, “
Effect of Clay Content on Liquid Limit from a Fall Cone and the British Cup Device
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
, Vol.
8
, pp.
91
95
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10515J
9.
CAN/BNQ Standard 2501–090,
2005
, “
Soils—Determination of Liquid Limit by the Casagrande Apparatus and Determination of Plastic Limit
,”
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and Bureau de Normalisation du Québec (BNQ), National Standard of Canada
,
Ottawa, ON
.
10.
CAN/BNQ 2501-092,
2006
, “
Soils—Determination of Liquid Limit by the Fall Cone Penetrometer and Determination of Plastic Limit
,”
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and Bureau de Normalisation du Québec (BNQ), National Standard of Canada
,
Ottawa, ON
.
11.
CAN/BNQ 2501-110,
2006
, “
Soils—Determination of Undrained Shear Strength and Determination of Sensitivity of Cohesive Soils using the Fall Cone Penetrometer
,”
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and Bureau de Normalisation du Québec (BNQ), National Standard of Canada
,
Ottawa, ON
.
12.
Casagrande
,
A.
,
1932
, “
Research on the Atterberg Limits of Soils
,”
Public Roads
, Vol.
13
, No.
8
, pp.
121
136
.
13.
Casagrande
,
A.
,
1958
, “
Notes on the Design of the Liquid Limit Device
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
8
, No.
2
, pp.
84
91
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1958.8.2.84
14.
Chapuis
,
R. P.
,
2002
, “
The 2000 R. M. Hardy Lecture: Full-Scale Hydraulic Performance of Soil-Bentonite and Compacted Clay Liners
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
39
, pp.
417
439
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-092
15.
Chapuis
,
R. P.
, and
Aubertin
,
M.
,
2003
, “
On the Use of the Kozeny-Carman Equation to Predict the Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
40
, pp.
616
628
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-013
16.
Chapuis
,
R. P.
,
Mbonimpa
,
M.
,
Dagenais
,
A. M.
, and
Aubertin
,
M.
,
2006
, “
A Linear Graphical Method to Predict the Effect of Compaction on the Hydraulic Conductivity of Clay Liners and Covers
,”
Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.
, Vol.
65
, No.
1
, pp.
93
98
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-005-0031-0
17.
Christaras
,
B.
,
1991
, “
Comparison of the Casagrande and Fall Cone Penetrometer Methods for Liquid Limit Determination in Marls from Crete, Greece
,”
Eng. Geol.
, Vol.
31
, pp.
131
142
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(91)90002-3
18.
Duhaime
,
F.
,
Benabdallah
,
E. M.
, and
Chapuis
,
R. P.
,
2010
, “
The Geotechnical Properties of a Champlain Clay Deposit with Salty Pore Water in Lachenaie, Quebec
,”
Proceedings of the 63rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference
,
Canadien Geotechnical Society
,
Calgary, AB
, Sept. 12–16, pp.
256
264
.
19.
Feng
,
T. W.
,
2002
, “
Percussion and Cone Methods of Determining the Liquid Limit of Soils: Controlling Mechanisms: Discussion
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
, Vol.
25
, No.
1
, pp.
104
105
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11085J
20.
Hansbo
,
S.
,
1957
, “
A New Approach to the Determination of the Shear Strength of Clay by the Fall-Cone Test
,”
Swed. Geotech. Inst. Proc.
, Vol.
14
, pp.
5
47
.
21.
Holtz
,
R. D.
, and
Kovacs
,
W. D.
,
1981
,
An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
22.
Houlsby
,
G. T.
,
1982
, “
Theoretical Analysis of the Fall Cone Test
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
32
, No.
2
, pp.
111
118
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1982.32.2.111
23.
Koumoto
,
T.
, and
Houlsby
,
G. T.
,
2001
, “
Theory and Practice of the Fall Cone Test
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
51
, No.
8
, pp.
701
712
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.8.701
24.
Leflaive
,
E.
,
1971
, “
Les limites d’Atterberg et le pénétrométre à cône (in French) [Atterberg limits and Fall Cone Penetrometer]
,”
Bull. Liaison Lab. Ponts Chaussées
, Vol.
50
, pp.
123
131
.
25.
Lefebvre
,
G.
, and
Grondin
,
G.
,
1978
, “
Étude des caractéristiques des argiles du Québec et critères d’identification des argiles extra-sensibles (in French) [Study of Quebec Clay Characteristics and Identification Criteria of Extra-Sensitive Clays]
,”
Report # QE193.Q4 DP–610
,
Ministère des Richesses Naturelles du Québec
,
Quebec, Canada
, 1978.
26.
Leroueil
,
S.
,
Tavenas
,
F.
, and
Le Bihan
,
J. P.
,
1983
, “
Propriétés caractéristiques des argiles de l’est du Canada [Characteristic Properties of Eastern Canada Clays]
,“
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
20
, pp.
681
705
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(85)90573-3
27.
Leroueil
,
S.
, and
Le Bihan
,
J. P.
,
1996
, “
Liquid Limits and Fall Cones
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
33
, pp.
793
798
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-104-324
28.
Littleton
,
I.
, and
Farmilo
,
M.
,
1977
, “
Some Observations on Liquid Limit Values
,”
Ground Eng.
, Vol.
10
, pp.
39
40
.
29.
Lu
,
T.
, and
Bryant
,
W. R.
,
1997
, “
Comparison of Vane Shear and Fall Cone Strengths of Soft Marine Clay
,”
Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol.
, Vol.
15
, pp.
67
82
. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641199709379935
30.
Mbonimpa
,
M.
,
Aubertin
,
M.
,
Chapuis
,
R. P.
, and
Bussière
,
B.
,
2002
, “
Practical Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating the Hydraulic Conductivity
,”
Geotech. Geol. Eng.
, Vol.
20
, pp.
235
259
. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016046214724
31.
Mishra
,
K. A.
,
Ohtsubo
,
M.
,
Li
,
L.
, and
Hiqashi
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Influence of Various Factors on the Difference in the Liquid Limit Values Determined by Casagrande’s and Fall Cone Methods
,”
Environ. Earth Sci.
, Vol.
65
, No.
1
, pp.
21
27
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1061-5
32.
Mitchell
,
J. E.
,
1960
, “
Liquid Limit Results from Various Types of Grooving Tools
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
, Vol.
254
, pp.
197
202
.
33.
Mitchell
,
J. K.
,
1960
, “
Fundamental Aspects of Thixotropy in Soils
,”
J. Soil Mech. Found. Div.
, Vol.
86
, No.
SM3
, pp.
19
52
.
34.
Mitchell
,
J. K.
, and
Soga
,
K.
,
2005
,
Fundamentals of Soil Behavior
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
35.
Muhunthan
,
B.
,
1991
, “
Liquid Limit and Surface Area of Clays
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
41
, No.
1
, pp.
135
138
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.1.135
36.
Norman
,
L. E. J.
,
1958
, “
A Comparison of Values of Liquid Limit Determined with Apparatus Having Bases of Different Hardness
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
8
, No.
2
, pp.
79
83
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1958.8.2.79
37.
Osipov
,
V. I.
,
Nikolaeva
,
S. K.
, and
Sokolov
,
V. N.
,
1984
, “
Microstructural Changes Associated with Thixotropic Phenomena in Clay Soils
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
34
, No.
2
, pp.
293
303
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1984.34.3.293
38.
Özer
,
M.
,
2009
, “
Comparison of Liquid Limit Values Determined Using the Hard and Soft Base Casagrande Apparatus and the Cone Penetrometer
,”
Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.
, Vol.
68
. pp.
289
296
.
39.
Perret
,
D.
,
Locat
,
J.
, and
Martignoni
,
P.
,
1996
, “
Thixotropic Behavior during Shear of a Fine-Grained Mud from Eastern Canada
,”
Eng. Geol.
, Vol.
43
, No.
1
, pp.
31
44
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(96)00031-2
40.
Pusch
,
R.
,
1982
, “
Thixotropic Stiffening of Clay Consolidated in the Laboratory
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
19
, pp.
517
521
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t82-057
41.
Réginensi
,
F.
,
2009
, “
Geochemical Evolution of a Champlain Clay Pore Water (in French)
,”
Master’s thesis
,
École Polytechnique de Montréal
,
Montreal, QC,Canada
.
42.
Ripple
,
C. D.
, and
Day
,
P. R.
,
1966
, “
Suction Responses Due to Shear of Dilute Montmorillonite-Water Pastes
,”
Clays Clay Miner.
, Vol.
14
, pp.
307
316
. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1966.0140127
43.
Sharma
,
B.
, and
Bora
,
P. K.
,
2003
, “
Plastic Limit, Liquid Limit and Undrained Shear Strength of Soil-Reappraisal
,”
J.Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
, Vol.
129
, pp.
774
777
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:8(774)
44.
Sherwood
,
P. T.
, and
Ryley
,
M. D.
,
1970
, “
An Investigation of a Cone-Penetrometer Method for the Determination of the Liquid Limit
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
20
, No.
2
, pp.
203
208
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1970.20.2.203
45.
Skempton
,
A. W.
, and
Northey
,
R. D.
,
1952
, “
Sensitivity of Clays
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
3
, No.
1
, pp.
30
53
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1952.3.1.30
46.
Terzaghi
,
K.
,
1926
, “
Simplified Soil Tests for Subgrades and their Physical Significance
,”
Public Roads
, Vol.
7
, No.
8
, pp.
153
170
.
47.
Wasti
,
Y.
,
1987
, “
Liquid and Plastic Limits as Determined from the Fall Cone and the Casagrande Methods
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
, Vol.
10
, pp.
26
30
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10135J
48.
Wasti
,
Y.
, and
Bezirci
,
M. H.
,
1986
, “
Determination of the Consistency Limits of Soils by the Fall Cone Test
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
23
, pp.
241
246
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-033
49.
Windisch
,
E. J.
, and
Yong
,
R. N.
,
1990
, “
A Statistical Evaluation of Some Engineering Properties of Eastern Canadian Clays
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
, Vol.
27
, pp.
373
386
. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-048
50.
Wood
,
D. M.
,
1985
, “
Some Fall Cone Tests
,”
Géotechnique
, Vol.
35
, No.
1
, pp.
64
68
. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.1.64
51.
Youssef
,
M. S.
,
El Ramli
,
A. H.
, and
El Demery
,
M.
,
1965
, “
Relationships between Shear Strength, Consolidation, Liquid Limit, and Plastic Limit for Remolded Clays
,”
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics
, September 8–15,
1965
,
Montreal, Canada
,
International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Toronto Press
,
Toronto, Canada, Montreal, Canada
, Vol.
1
, pp.
126
129
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.