Abstract

A test protocol for the quantification of creep between modular block (segmental) facing units and geosynthetic reinforcement can be found in a Federal Highway Administration guidance document first published in 2001. However, to date the utility of the proposed method has not been examined in a systematic manner nor have test results been reported in the research literature. The paper describes a test apparatus and reports the results of a series of connection creep tests that demonstrate details of the proposed methodology and lessons learned. Important recommendations for data interpretation are presented for the first time. An additional practical result of this study is a consistent method to calculate the connection creep reduction factor required for design using the results of conventional short-term connection test results and connection creep-rupture curves.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
geosynthetics, segmental blocks, masonry concrete, connection creep, analysis

References

1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
,
2002
,
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
, 17th ed.,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
,
2007
,
LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
, 4th ed.,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
3.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
,
2008
, “
Laboratory Testing of Geosynthetic Reinforcement Final Report (2005)—03 Product Submissions
,” NTPEP Report No. 8501.1, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
4.
ASTM C1372,
2004
, “
Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Segmental Retaining Wall Units
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
5.
ASTM D6992,
2003
, “
Standard Test Method for Accelerated Tensile Creep and Creep-Rupture of Geosynthetic Materials Based on Time-Temperature Superposition Using the Stepped Isothermal Method
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
6.
ASTM D6638,
2007
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Connection Strength Between Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Segmental Concrete Units (Modular Concrete Blocks)
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
7.
ASTM D6637,
2001
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single or Multi-Rib Tensile Method
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
8.
ASTM D6916,
2006
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining the Shear Strength Between Segmental Concrete Units (Modular Concrete Blocks)
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
9.
ASTM D5262,
2007
, “
Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Unconfined Tension Creep and Creep Rupture Behavior of Geosynthetics
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
10.
Bathurst
,
R. J.
,
Althoff
,
S.
, and
Linnenbaum
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Influence of Test Method on Direct Shear Behavior of Segmental Retaining Wall Units
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
 0149-6115, Vol.
31
, pp.
157
–
165
.
11.
Bathurst
,
R. J.
 and
Simac
,
M. R.
,
1993
, “
Laboratory Testing of Modular Unit-Geogrid Facing Connections
,”
STP 1190: Geosynthetic Soil Reinforcement Testing Procedures
,
Cheng
 
S. C. J.
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
32
–
48
. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP24311S
12.
Bathurst
,
R. J.
 and
Simac
,
M. R.
,
1994
, “
Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Wall Structures in North America
,”
5th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
4
, Singapore, September 6–9, Southeast Chapter of the International Geotextile Society, Singapore, pp.
1275
–
1298
.
13.
Bathurst
,
R. J.
,
Simac
,
M. R.
, and
Berg
,
R. R.
,
1993
, “
Review of the NCMA Segmental Retaining Wall Design Manual for Geosynthetic-Reinforced Structures
,” Transportation Research Record. 1414, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp.
16
–
25
.
14.
Collin
,
J. G.
 and
Berg
,
R. R.
,
1993
, “
Connection Strength Criteria for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
,” Transportation Research Record. 1414, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp.
32
–
37
.
15.
Elias
,
V.
,
Christopher
,
B. R.
, and
Berg
,
R. R.
,
2001
, “
Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes—Design and Construction Guidelines
,” Report No. FHWA-NHI-00-043, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
16.
Industrial Fabrics Association International
,
1997
,
Geosynthetics Specifier’s Guide
,
Industrial Fabrics Association International (IFAI)
,
Roseville, MN
.
17.
National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA)
,
2009
,
Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls
, 3rd ed.,
Bernardi
 
M.
, Ed.,
NCMA
,
Herndon, VA
.
18.
Thornton
,
J. S.
 and
Arnett
,
S. L.
,
1997
, “
Creep Reduced Strength Determination for Miragrid 5XT Using Unconfined Tension Creep, Time-Temperature Superposition and Creep Rupture Principles
,” Technical Note for T.C. Mirafi, Inc., Lake Forest, CA.
19.
Thornton
,
J. S.
 and
Arnett
,
S. L.
,
1997
, “
Creep Reduced Strength Determination for Miragrid 8XT Using Unconfined Tension Creep, Time-Temperature Superposition and Creep Rupture Principles
,” Technical Note for T.C. Mirafi, Inc., Lake Forest, CA.
This content is only available via PDF.
All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of ASTM International.
You do not currently have access to this content.