Abstract

Consistency limits are fundamental properties of fine grained soils. The techniques used today to determine these parameters are operator dependent; their repeatability is low. In order to overcome and/or reduce those factors affecting the results of conventional testing methods, the reverse extrusion technique was evaluated. Thirty-one inorganic soil samples were used in the experiments. In order to produce a reliable basis for the plastic and liquid limits, a relatively broad database was constituted using the conventional consistency limit tests. Extrusion pressures were then obtained and plotted for different water contents for each sample. A linear relationship was observed among the water content and the logarithm of the extrusion pressure. The extrusion pressures corresponding to the average plastic and liquid limits of the conventional method show a normal distribution about certain values. A more reliable, economical, and robust device with greater repeatability is proposed. The presented approach shows promise in providing a better index parameter to characterize fine grained soils.

References

1.
ASTM D4318-00,
2001
, “
Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
04.08
, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1
-
14
.
2.
Atterberg
,
A.
,
1911
, “
Uber die Physikalicshe Bodenuntersuchung, and uber die Plastizitat der Tone
,”
Internationale Mittelungen fur Bodenkunde
,
Berlin
, Vol. 1, pp.
10
43
.
3.
BS1377-2,
1990
, “
Methods of Test for Soils Suitable for Civil Engineering Purposes—Classification Tests
,” British Standards Institution (BSI), London, United Kingdom.
4.
Dieter
,
G. E.
,
1988
,
Mechanical Metallurgy
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, 751 pp.
5.
Johnston
,
M. M.
and
Strohm
,
W. E.
,
1968
, “
Results of Second Division Laboratory Testing Program on Standard Soil Samples
,” Misc. Paper No. 3-978, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
6.
Lee
,
L. T.
and
Freeman
,
R. B.
,
2007
, “
An Alternative Test Method for Assessing Consistency Limits
,”
Geotech. Test. J.
 0149-6115, Vol.
30
(
4
), pp.
1
8
.
7.
Prakash
,
K.
and
Sridharan
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Critical Appraisal of the Cone Penetration Method of Determining Soil Plasticity
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
 0008-3674, Vol.
43
, pp.
884
888
. https://doi.org/10.1139/T06-043
8.
Sherwood
,
P. T.
,
1970
, “
The Reproducibility of the Results of Soil Classification and Compaction Tests
,” Report No. LR 339, TRRL, Crawthorne, RG11 6AU, Berkshire, England.
9.
Terzaghi
,
K.
,
1926
, “
Simplified Soil Tests for Subgrades and Their Physical Significance
,”
Public Roads.
, Vol.
7
, pp.
240
247
.
10.
WES
,
1948
, “
Trafficability of soils—Development of testing instruments
,” Technical Memorandum No. 3-240, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
11.
Whyte
,
I. L.
,
1982
, “
Soil Plasticity and Strength—A New Approach for Using Extrusion
,”
Ground Eng.
 0017-4653, Vol.
15
(
1
), pp.
16
24
.
12.
Wroth
,
C. P.
and
Wood
,
D. M.
,
1978
, “
The Correlation of Index Properties with Some Basic Engineering Properties of Soils
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
 0008-3674, Vol.
15
(
2
), pp.
137
145
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.