Abstract

A new field-testing technique has been developed in which liquefaction and pore pressure generation characteristics of soil are measured in situ. The in situ dynamic liquefaction test utilizes a large, hydraulic shaker to load dynamically a soil deposit. The soil response is measured with embedded instrumentation. The embedded instrumentation includes newly developed liquefaction test sensors that incorporate velocity transducers (geophones) and pore pressure transducers in a single case. The recorded data are used to describe pore pressure generation and liquefaction characteristics in terms of the relationship between shear strain and induced pore pressure ratio. The analytical techniques used to compute shear strain from particle velocity measurements are discussed and compared. The results from testing a 1.2-m by 1.2-m by 1.2-m reconstituted field test specimen are presented. The shear strain—pore pressure relationships at selected numbers of loading cycles that were determined from the in situ dynamic liquefaction test are compared with those measured by other investigators in the laboratory. The field-measured relationships show the same shape as the lab-measured relationships, but the field data indicate a smaller threshold strain for pore pressure generation (∼0.005 %). This difference is attributed to the low effective stresses in the reconstituted field specimen.

References

1.
Andrus
,
R. D.
and
Stokoe
,
K. H.
 II
,
2000
, “
Liquefaction Resistance of Soils from Shear-Wave Velocity
,”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
 1090-0241 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015), American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
126
, No.
11
, pp.
1015
-
1025
.
2.
Axtell
,
P. J.
,
2001
, “
In-Situ Measurements of Linear and Nonlinear Properties of a Near-Surface, Poorly Graded Sand
,” Master of Science Thesis,
University of Texas
at Austin.
3.
Bay
,
J. A.
,
1997
, “
Development of a Rolling Dynamic Deflectometer for Continuous Deflection Testing of Pavements
,” Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Texas
at Austin.
4.
Bay
,
J. A.
,
Stokoe
,
K. H.
 II.
,
McCullough
,
B. F.
, and
Alexander
,
D. R.
,
1999
, “
Profiling Flexible Highway Pavement Continuously with Rolling Dynamic Deflectometer and at Discrete Points with a Falling Weight Deflectometer
,” Transportation Research Record No. 1665.
5.
Chang
,
W.-J.
,
2002
, “
Development of an In Situ Dynamic Liquefaction Test
,” Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of Texas
at Austin.
6.
Dobry
,
R.
and
Swiger
,
W. F.
,
1979
, “
Threshold Strain and Cyclic Behavior of Cohesionless Soils
,”
Proceedings, 3rd ASCE/EMDE Specialty Conference
,
Austin, TX
, 17–19 September.
7.
Dobry
,
R.
,
Ladd
,
R. S.
,
Yokel
,
F. Y.
,
Chung
,
R. M.
, and
Powell
,
D.
,
1982
, “
Prediction of Pore Water Pressure Buildup and Liquefaction of Sands During Earthquake by the Cyclic Strain Method
,” NBS Building Science Series 138,
National Bureau of Standards
,
Gaithersburg, MD
.
8.
EERI 2000
, “
The Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of August 17, 1999 Reconnaissance Report
,”
Earthquake Spectra
,
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
, Vol.
16
, No. A.
9.
EERI 2001
, “
The Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake of September 21, 1999 Reconnaissance Report
,”
Earthquake Spectra
,
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
, Vol.
17
, No. A.
10.
Foinquinos
,
R.
and
Roesset
,
J. M.
,
2000
, “
Elastic Layered Half-Spaces Subjected to Dynamic Surface Loads
,”
Wave Motion in Earthquake Engineering
,
Kausel
E.
and
Manolos
G.
, Eds.,
MIT press
,
Ashurst, Southampton, UK
, pp.
215
-
246
.
11.
Hryciw
,
R. D.
,
Vitton
,
S.
, and
Thomann
,
T. G.
1990
, “
Liquefaction and Flow Failure During Seismic Exploration
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
 0733-9410, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
116
, No.
12
, pp.
1881
-
1899
.
12.
Phillips
,
R. D.
,
2000
, “
Initial Design and Implementation of an In Situ Test for Measurement of Nonlinear Soil Properties
,” Master of Science Thesis,
University of Texas
at Austin.
13.
Rathje
,
E.
,
Phillips
,
R.
,
Chang
,
W. J.
, and
Stokoe
,
K. H.
,
2001
, “
Evaluating Nonlinear Response In Situ
,”
Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics
,
San Diego, CA
, March.
14.
Rathje
,
E.
,
Chang
,
W.-J.
, and
Stokoe
,
K. H.
,
2004
, “
Evaluation of Ground Strain from In Situ Dynamic Response Measurements
,”
13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
,
Vancouver
,
Canada
, August, accepted for publication, August.
15.
Rayleigh
,
L.
,
1885
, “
On Waves Propagated Along the Plane Surface of an Elastic Solid
,”
Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society
, Vol.
17
, pp.
4
-
11
.
16.
Richart
,
F. E.
,
Hall
,
J. R.
, and
Woods
,
R. D.
,
1970
,
Vibration of Soils and Foundations
,
Prentice-Hall, NJ
.
17.
Robertson
,
P. K.
and
Wride
,
C. E.
,
1998
, “
Evaluating Cyclic Liquefaction Potential Using the Cone Penetration Test
,”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 0008-3674 https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-35-3-442, Ottawa, Vol.
35
, No.
3
, pp.
442
-
459
.
18.
Seed
,
H. B.
and
Idriss
,
I. M.
,
1971
, “
Simplified Procedure for Evaluation Soil Liquefaction Potential
,”
Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division
 0044-7994, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
107
, No.
SM9
, pp.
1249
-
1274
.
19.
Seed
,
H. B.
,
Tokimatsu
,
K.
,
Harder
,
L. F.
, and
Chung
,
R. M.
,
1985
, “
Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
 0733-9410, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
111
, No.
12
, pp.
1425
-
1445
.
20.
Stokoe
,
K. H.
 II.
,
Bay
,
J. A.
,
Rosenblad
,
B. L.
,
Murphy
,
M. R.
,
Fults
,
K. W.
, and
Chen
,
D. H.
,
2000
, “
Super-Accelerated Testing of a Flexible Pavement with the Stationary Dynamic Deflectometer (SDD)
,”
2000 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
.
21.
Stokoe
,
K. H.
,
Axtell
,
P. J.
, and
Rathje
,
E. M.
,
2001
, “
Development of an In Situ Method to Measure Nonlinear Soil Behavior
,”
Third International Conference on Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures
,
Malaga
,
Spain
, September.
22.
Stokoe
,
K. H.
,
Rathje
,
E. M.
,
Wilson
,
C. R.
,
Rosenblad
,
B. L.
, and
Menq
,
F.-Y.
,
2004
, “
Development of the NEES Large-Scale Mobile Shakers and Associated Instrumentation for In Situ Evaluation of Nonlinear Characteristics and Liquefaction Resistance of Soils
,”
13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
,
Vancouver
,
Canada
, August, accepted for publication, August.
23.
White
,
J. E.
,
1965
,
Seismic Waves: Radiation, Transmission, and Attenuation
,
McGraw-Hill Book Company
,
New York
.
24.
Woods
,
R. D.
,
1968
, “
Screening of Surface Waves in Soils
,”
Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division
 0044-7994, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
94
, No.
SM4
, pp.
951
-
979
.
25.
Youd
,
T. L.
, et al
,
2001
. “
Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils
,”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
 1090-0241 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817), American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.
127
, No.
10
, pp.
817
-
833
.
26.
Zienkiewicz
,
O. C.
and
Taylor
,
R. L.
,
1989
,
The Finite Element Method: Basic Formulation and Linear Problems
, 4th ed., Vol.
1
,
McGraw-Hill International Book Company
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.