Abstract

The recent growth and development of the Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP) industry have created the need for a way to compare the wide array of products now available.

The Erosion Control Technology Council (ECTC) identified the need for standardized performance testing for RECPs and initiated a project to develop performance tests that provide economical and efficient product evaluation and which are suitable for the ASTM approval process. The resulting new performance test protocols have been developed:

• “Determination of RECP Performance in Protecting Soil from Rainsplash”

• “Determination of RECP Performance under Shear Stress”

• “Determination of the Biodegradability of RECPs by CO2 Release”

• “Determination of RECP Performance in Encouraging Seed Germination and Vegetation Growth”

This paper documents the developmental process including the design bases for erosion control tests, a review of existing performance test practices, and details the new performance test protocols for RECPs in both slope and channel lining applications. Initial testing using the new test standards has indicated that the tests are practical, cost-efficient, and reproducible.

References

1.
Austin
,
D. N.
and
Ward
,
L. E.
,
1996
, “
ECTC Provides Guidelines for Rolled Erosion Control Products
,”
Geotechnical Fabrics Report
, January–February.
2.
Cabalka
,
D. A.
,
Clopper
,
P. E.
,
Johnson
,
A. G.
, and
Vielleux
,
M. T.
,
1998
, “
Research, Development, and Implementation of Test Protocols for Rainfall Erosion Facilities (REFS)
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXIX, International Erosion Control Association
,
Reno
, pp.
249
-
263
.
3.
Clopper
,
P. E.
,
Cabalka
,
D. A.
, and
Johnson
,
A. G.
,
1998
, “
Research, Development, and Implementation of Performance Testing Protocols for Channel Erosion Research Facilities (CERFS)
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXIX, International Erosion Control Association
,
Reno
, pp.
237
-
248
.
4.
ECTC
,
1997
,
Letter to the FHWA providing Documentation for HEC #15 Updating, Erosion Control Technology Council, c/o Tim Lancaster
,
North American Green, Inc.
5.
Godfrey
,
S. H.
and
Landphair
,
H. C.
,
1991
, “
Temporary Erosion Control Materials Testing
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXII, International Erosion Control Association
,
Orlando
, pp.
107
-
120
.
6.
Gray
,
D. H.
and
Sotir
,
R. B.
,
1996
,
Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control
,
John Wiley & Sons
, pp. 30, 35, 329.
7.
GRI
,
1994
a, “
GRI Test Method GC5-Standard Test Method for Erosion Control Systems to Protect Against Soil Detachment by Rainfall Impact and Overland Flow Transport
,”
Geosynthetics Research Institute
,
Folsom, PA
.
8.
GRI
,
1994
b, “
GRI Test Method GC6-Standard Test Method for Erosion Control Systems for High Velocity Flows in Channels
,”
Geosynthetics Research Institute
,
Folsom, PA
.
9.
Hewlett
,
H. W. M.
,
Borman
,
L. G.
, and
Brambley
,
M. E.
,
1987
,
Design of Reinforced Grass Waterways, Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA)
Report 116, London, U. K.
10.
International Erosion Control Association
,
1996
, “
Practical Approaches for Effective Erosion and Sediment Control
,”
Short Course Notes
,
Steamboat Springs, CO
.
11.
Israelsen
,
C. E.
,
1994
, “
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Erosion Control Products and Practices
,”
Land and Water
, January/February, pp.
22
-
25
.
12.
Keller
,
E. J.
and
Middlebrooks
,
P.
,
1989
, “
Channel Protection Criteria Update
,”
Office of Materials and Research, Georgia Department of Transportation—USDOT/FHWA
, April.
13.
Kirkby
,
M. J.
and
Morgan
,
R. P. C.
,
1980
,
Soil Erosion
,
John Wiley & Sons
, p. 271.
14.
North American Green, Inc.
,
1993
, “
High Velocity Flow Tests of Two Root-Reinforcing Materials under Bare and Sodded Conditions
,”
Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University
, October–November.
15.
Northcutt
,
P. E.
,
1993
, “
Field Performance Testing of Roll-Type Erosion Control Blankets Through the Erosion Control Field Laboratory
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXIV, International Erosion Control Association
,
Indianapolis
, pp.
187
-
202
.
16.
Northcutt
,
P. E.
and
McFalls
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Performance Testing of Erosion Control Products — What Have We Learned After Five Complete Evaluation Cycles
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXIX, International Erosion Control Association
,
Reno
, pp.
201
-
218
.
17.
Northcutt
,
P. J.
and
McFalls
,
J.
,
1997
, “
Field Performance Testing of Selected Erosion Control Products Final Performance Analysis Through the 1996 Evaluation Cycle
,”
TXDOT/TTI Hydraulics and Erosion Control Laboratory
, February.
18.
Rustom
,
R. N.
and
Weggel
,
J. R.
,
1993
, “
A Study of Erosion Control Systems: Experimental Apparatus
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXIV
,
Indianapolis
, pp.
241
-
251
.
19.
Rustom
,
R. N.
and
Weggel
,
J. R.
,
1993
b, “
A Study of Erosion Control Systems: Experimental Results
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXIV, International Erosion Control Association
,
Indianapolis
, pp.
255
-
275
.
20.
Sanders
,
T. G.
,
Abt
,
S. R.
, and
Clopper
,
P. E.
,
1990
, “
A Quantitative Test of Erosion Control Materials
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXI, International Erosion Control Association
,
Washington, D.C.
, pp.
211
-
220
.
21.
Smith
,
J. O.
and
Ports
,
M. A.
,
1976
, “
Maryland Highway Erosion and Sediment Control: Evaluation and Future Directions
,”
Land Application of Waste Materials, SCSA
,
Ankeny, IA
, pp.
262
-
275
.
22.
Sutherland
,
R. A.
and
Ziegler
,
A. D.
,
1996
, “
Geotextile Effectiveness in Reducing Interrill Runoff and Sediment Flux
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXVII, International Erosion Control Association
,
Seattle
, pp.
395
-
405
.
23.
Urroz
,
G. E.
and
Israelsen
,
C. E.
,
1994
, “
Direct Measurement of Shear on Erosion Control Mats
,”
Proceedings of Conference XXV, International Erosion Control Association
,
Reno, NV
, pp.
93
-
96
.
24.
USDA-SCS,
1956
, NEII-5.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.