Abstract

The results of hydrodynamic sieving tests in which pretensioned geotextile specimens were tested using glass beads as the suspended particles are reported. Biaxial as well as uniaxial tensile loads were used. Two types of geotextile were tested, a woven slit-film polypropylene geotextile and a nonwoven needle-punched polyester geotextile. In all but one of the tests reported, the effect of a tensile load was to reduce the filtration opening size. The effect was most pronounced with the woven geotextile, where an equal biaxial load of only 8% of the minimum tensile strength of the geotextile resulted in a 28% decrease in the filtration opening size. Since all the tests resulted in a decrease in the filtration opening size, it appears unlikely that inplane tensile loads will exacerbate problems of loss of particles through a geotextile. However, it is suggested that increased problems associated with geotextile clogging and blinding can be expected. Preliminary tests in a modified permeameter on uniaxially loaded geotextile specimens in contact with a fine sand confirmed this hypothesis.

References

1.
Bhatia
,
S. K.
,
Smith
,
J. L.
, and
Christopher
,
B. R.
,
1994
, “
Interrelationship Between Pore Openings of Geotextiles and Methods of Evaluation
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
2
,
Singapore
,
09
1994
, pp.
705
-
710
.
2.
Carroll
,
R. G.
,
1983
, “
Geotextile Filter Criteria
,”
Transportation Research Record
916
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
, pp.
46
-
53
.
3.
Christopher
,
B. R.
and
Fischer
,
G. R.
,
1991
, “
A Critical Review of Geotextile Pore Size Measurement Methods
,”
Filters in Geotechnical and Hydraulic Engineering
,
Brauns
,
Heibaum
, and
Schuler
, Eds.,
Balkema
,
Rotterdam
, pp.
83
-
89
.
4.
Christopher
,
B. R.
and
Holtz
,
R. D.
,
1985
, “
Geotextile Engineering Manual
,” Report FHWA-TS-86/203,
U.S. Federal Highway Administration
Washington, DC.
5.
Fischer
,
G. R.
,
Christopher
,
B. R.
, and
Holtz
,
R. D.
,
1990
, “
Filter Criteria Based on Pore Size Distribution
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
1
,
The Hague
,
The Netherlands
,
05
1990
, pp.
289
-
294
.
6.
Fischer
,
G. R.
,
Holtz
,
R. D.
, and
Christopher
,
B. R.
,
1993
, “
A Critical Review of Geotextile Pore Size Measurement Methods
,”
Proceeding of the First International Conference
“Geo-filters,” Karlsruhe
,
Germany
,
10
1992
, pp.
83
-
89
.
7.
Fourie
,
A. B.
and
Kuchena
,
S. M.
The Influence of Tensile Stresses on the Filtration Characteristics of Geotextiles
,”
Geosynthetics International
 1072-6349, Vol.
2
, No.
2
, pp.
455
-
471
.
8.
Giroud
,
J. P.
,
1980
, “
Introduction to Geotextiles and their Applications
,”
Proceedings of the First Canadian Symposium on Geotextiles
,
09
1980
, pp.
3
-
31
.
9.
Giroud
,
J. P.
,
1983
, “
Geotextile Drainage Layers for Soil Consolidation
,”
Civil Engineering for Practising and Design Engineers
, Vol.
2
,
Pergamon Press Ltd.
,
Elmsford, NY
, pp.
275
-
295
.
10.
Giroud
,
J. P.
,
1996
, “
Granular filters and geotextile filters
,”
Proceedings Geofilters '96
,
Montreal
,
05
1996
, pp.
565
-
680
.
11.
Gourc
,
J. P.
and
Faure
,
Y.-H.
,
1990
, “
Soil Particles, Water … and Fibres—A Fruitful Interaction Now Controlled
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
3
,
The Hague
,
The Netherlands
,
05
1990
, pp.
949
-
971
.
12.
Koerner
,
R. M.
and
Ko
,
F. K.
,
1982
, “
Laboratory Studies on Long Term Drainage Capability of Geotextiles
,”
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotextiles
, Vol.
1
,
Las Vegas, NV
,
1982
, pp.
91
-
95
.
13.
Luettich
,
S. M.
,
Giroud
,
J. P.
, and
Bachus
,
R. C.
,
1992
, “
Geotextile Filter Design Guide
,”
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
, Vol.
11
, Nos. 4–6, pp.
355
-
370
.
14.
McGown
,
A.
,
Kabir
,
M. H.
, and
Murray
,
R. T.
,
1982
, “
Compressibility and Hydraulic Conductivity of Geotextiles
,”
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotextiles
, Vol.
1
,
Las Vegas, NV
,
1982
, pp.
167
-
172
.
15.
Mlynarek
,
J.
,
Lafleur
,
J.
,
Rollin
,
A.
, and
Lombard
,
G.
,
1993
, “
Filtration Opening Size of Geotextiles by Hydrodynamic Sieving
,”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
 0149-6115, Vol.
16
, No.
1
, pp.
61
-
69
.
16.
Rollin
,
A. L.
,
Mlynarek
,
J.
, and
Vidovic
,
A.
,
1990
, “
Filtration Opening Size of Geotextile: The Parameters Influencing the Pore Size Distribution
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
1
,
The Hague
,
The Netherlands
,
05
1990
, pp.
295
-
299
.
17.
Rowe
,
R. K.
and
Myleville
,
B. L. J.
,
1990
, “
Implications of Adopting an Allowable Geosynthetic Strain in Estimating Stability
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
1
,
The Hague
,
The Netherlands
,
05
1990
, pp.
131
-
136
.
18.
Schimelfenyg
,
P.
,
Fowler
,
J.
, and
Leshchinsky
,
D.
,
1990
, “
Fabric Reinforced Containment Dyke, New Bedford Superfund Site
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
1
,
The Hague
,
The Netherlands
,
05
1990
, pp.
149
-
154
.
19.
Shi
,
Y. C.
,
Fannin
,
R. J.
, and
Vaid
,
Y. P.
,
1994
, “
Interpretation of Gradient Ratio Test Results
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products
, Vol.
2
,
Singapore
,
09
1994
, pp.
673
-
676
.
20.
Vermeersch
,
O. G.
and
Mlynarek
,
J.
,
1996
, “
Determination of the Pore Size Distribution of Non-Woven Geotextiles by a Modified Capillary Flow Porometry Technique
,”
Recent Developments in Geotextiles Filters and Prefabricated Drainage Composites
, ASTM STP 1281,
Bhatia
S. K.
and
Suits
L. D.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.