Abstract

Hydrostatic thrust bearings (HTBs) are required in various turbomachinery systems due to their substantial load capacity and superior rotor axial positioning capabilities, which minimize friction and heat generation. However, when lubricated with compressible fluids, these bearings can experience pneumatic hammer instability especially if the recess volume is significant. This study aims to establish design guidelines and experimentally validate the performance of hydrostatic thrust bearings, with a focus on predicting and mitigating pneumatic hammer instability. The research includes an investigation into the static load characteristics of these bearings when operated with air as the lubricant. The analysis in this paper covers the effects of varying supply pressures, recess depths, and orifice diameters on pneumatic hammer instability, as well as on the load capacity, stiffness, and damping coefficients of the bearings. To validate these findings, experiments are conducted using two test bearings with differing recess depths and orifice diameters. The results from both predictive models and experimental data consistently show that a shallow recess depth is effective in preventing pneumatic hammer instability without notably diminishing the bearing load capacity. Nonetheless, modifying the orifice diameter to control pneumatic hammer instability requires careful design consideration, as it might lead to decreased load capacity and stiffness. This research addresses the challenge of preventing pneumatic hammer instability in hydrostatic thrust bearings through a combined approach of numerical analysis and experimental testing. It contributes significantly to the field by offering practical design recommendations for optimizing recess depth and orifice diameter. These guidelines aim to eliminate pneumatic hammer instability while preserving critical performance aspects of hydrostatic thrust bearings, such as load capacity and stiffness.

References

1.
Yoshimoto
,
S.
,
Yamamoto
,
M.
, and
Toda
,
K.
,
2007
, “
Numerical Calculations of Pressure Distribution in the Bearing Clearance of Circular Aerostatic Thrust Bearings With a Sing Air Supply Inlet
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
129
(
2
), pp.
384
390
.10.1115/1.2464135
2.
Belforte
,
G.
,
Raparelli
,
T.
,
Viktorov
,
V.
, and
Trivella
,
A.
,
2007
, “
Discharge Coefficients of Orifice-Type Restrictor for Aerostatic Bearings
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
40
(
3
), pp.
512
521
.10.1016/j.triboint.2006.05.003
3.
Miyatake
,
M.
, and
Yoshimoto
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Numerical Investigation of Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Bearings With Small Feed Holes
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
43
(
8
), pp.
1353
1359
.10.1016/j.triboint.2010.01.002
4.
Belforte
,
G.
,
Colombo
,
F.
,
Raparelli
,
T.
,
Trivella
,
A.
, and
Viktorov
,
V.
,
2010
, “
Performance of Externally Pressurized Grooved Thrust Bearings
,”
Tribol. Lett.
,
37
(
3
), pp.
553
562
.10.1007/s11249-009-9550-3
5.
Nishio
,
U.
,
Somaya
,
K.
, and
Yoshimoto
,
S.
,
2011
, “
Numerical Calculation and Experimental Verification of Static and Dynamic Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Bearings With Small Feedholes
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
44
(
12
), pp.
1790
1795
.10.1016/j.triboint.2011.07.004
6.
Charki
,
A.
,
Diop
,
K.
,
Champmartin
,
S.
, and
Ambari
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of Thrust Air Bearings With Multiple Orifices
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
72
, pp.
28
38
.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.03.006
7.
Sharma
,
S. C.
,
Jain
,
S. C.
, and
Bharuka
,
D. K.
,
2002
, “
Influence of Recess Shape on the Performance of a Capillary Compensated Circular Thrust Pad Hydrostatic Bearing
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
35
(
6
), pp.
347
356
.10.1016/S0301-679X(02)00013-0
8.
Chen
,
X. D.
, and
He
,
X. M.
,
2006
, “
The Effect of the Recess Shape on Performance Analysis of the Gas-Lubricated Bearing in Optical Lithography
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
39
(
11
), pp.
1336
1341
.10.1016/j.triboint.2005.10.005
9.
Bakker
,
O. J.
, and
Van Ostayen
,
R. A. J.
,
2010
, “
Recess Depth Optimization for Rotating, Annular, and Circular Recess Hydrostatic Thrust Bearings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
132
(
1
), p.
011103
.10.1115/1.4000545
10.
Boffey
,
D. A.
,
1978
, “
A Study of the Stability of an Externally-Pressurized Gas-Lubricated Thrust Bearing With a Flexible Damped Support
,”
Trans. ASME
,
100
(
3
), pp.
364
368
.10.1115/1.3453186
11.
Licht
,
L.
,
Fuller
,
D. D.
, and
Sternlicht
,
B.
,
1958
, “
Self-Excited Vibrations of an Air-Lubricated Thrust Bearing
,”
Trans. ASME
,
80
(
2
), pp.
411
414
.10.1115/1.4012384
12.
Stowell
,
T. B.
,
1971
, “
Pneumatic Hammer in a Gas Lubricated Externally Pressurized Annular Thrust Bearing
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
93
(
4
), pp.
498
503
.10.1115/1.3451622
13.
Lund
,
J. W.
,
1967
, “
A Theoretical Analysis of Whirl Instability and Pneumatic Hammer for a Rigid Rotor in Pressurized Gas Journal Bearings
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
89
(
2
), pp.
154
165
.10.1115/1.3616933
14.
Fourka
,
M.
,
Tian
,
Y.
, and
Bonis
,
M.
,
1996
, “
Prediction of the Stability of Air Thrust Bearings by Numerical, Analytical and Experimental Methods
,”
Wear
,
198
(
1–2
), pp.
1
6
.10.1016/0043-1648(95)06782-5
15.
San Andrés
,
L. A.
,
1991
, “
Effects of Fluid Compressibility on the Dynamic Response of Hydrostatic Journal Bearings
,”
Wear
,
146
(
2
), pp.
269
283
.10.1016/0043-1648(91)90068-6
16.
Rowe
,
W. B.
,
1980
, “
Dynamic and Static Properties of Recessed Hydrostatic Journal Bearings by Small Displacement Analysis
,”
ASME. J. Lubr. Technol.
,
102
(
1
), pp.
71
79
.10.1115/1.3251441
17.
Jung
,
H.
,
Sin
,
S.
,
Heo
,
J.
,
Wee
,
M.
, and
Ryu
,
K.
,
2022
, “
On the Pneumatic Hammer of Hybrid Gas Bearings: Measurements and Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
144
(
12
), p.
121011
.10.1115/1.4055485
18.
Arghir
,
M.
,
Hassini
,
M. A.
,
Balducchi
,
F.
, and
Gauthier
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Synthesis of Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Pneumatic Hammer Instability in an Aerostatic Bearing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
33
(
12
), p.
021602
.10.1115/1.4031322
19.
Delgado
,
A.
, and
Ertas
,
B.
,
2018
, “
Dynamic Force Coefficients of Hydrostatic Gas Films for Recessed Flat Plates: Experimental Identification and Numerical Predictions
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
140
(
6
), p.
061703
.10.1115/1.4040114
20.
Talukder
,
H. M.
, and
Stowell
,
T. B.
,
2003
, “
Pneumatic Hammer in an Externally Pressurized Orifice-Compensated Air Journal Bearing
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
36
(
8
), pp.
585
591
.10.1016/S0301-679X(02)00247-5
21.
Ma
,
W.
,
Cui
,
J.
,
Liu
,
Y.
, and
Tan
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Improving the Pneumatic Hammer Stability of Aerostatic Thrust Bearing With Recess Using Damping Orifices
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
103
, pp.
281
288
.10.1016/j.triboint.2016.06.009
22.
Lim
,
H.
, and
Ryu
,
K.
,
2023
, “
Experimental Force Coefficients of a Hydrostatic Thrust Bearing and Comparisons to Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
145
(
11
), p.
111010
.10.1115/1.4063308
23.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2014
, “
Damper Seals and Hydrostatic Bearings for Pump Applications: Hydrostatic & Hydrodynamic Bearings
,”
Modern Lubrication Theory, Notes 12(b)
,
Libraries Texas A&M University Repository, Texas A&M University Library
,
College Station, TX
.
24.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Zhu
,
X.
,
2003
, “
Experimental Response of a Rotor Supported on Flexure Pivot Hydrostatic Pad Gas Bearings
,”
Turbomachinery Laboratory of Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
, Report No.
TRC-B&C-4-03
.https://rotorlab.tamu.edu/TRIBGROUP/TRC%2002-12%20reports/2003%20Zhu-San%20Andres-Experimental%20Response%20of%20a%20Rotor%20Supported%20on%20Flexure%20Pivot%20Hydrostatic%20Pad%20Gas%20Bearings.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.