Abstract

In turbomachinery rows, the geometric variability between the airfoils induces nonuniformity in the flow, which directly translates into low engine order (LEO) excitation and vibration in the adjacent rows. Direct simulations of this phenomenon involve full-row computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses, where the exact geometry of each individual blade needs to be properly reproduced. The related computational cost of such simulations is very significant. Since the geometric variability due to the manufacturing scatter is stochastic, valuable information could be derived from Monte Carlo analyses involving randomly generated geometries; nevertheless, this approach would be very resource-intensive. In this paper, we propose a simplified method to determine the flow perturbation generated by this geometric variability. The method is based on studying the underlying properties of the geometric scatter using principal component analysis (PCA) techniques, obtaining a compact description of the variability of the airfoils. The flow perturbation due to a reduced number of reference cases is obtained through direct, large scale simulations. By assuming linearity in the flow perturbations, the solution for a general case of geometric distortion may be obtained very efficiently from these reference cases, which makes Monte Carlo studies to analyze stochastic geometric distortion easily affordable. The capabilities of the method are demonstrated in a test case considering the real geometry scatter from an aircraft turbine. According to the results, the average LEO response due to the random geometry scatter involves significant vibration levels, comparable (in terms of alternating stress) to the response due to the blade-passing excitation.

References

1.
Breard
,
C.
,
Green
,
J. S.
, and
Imregun
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Low-Engine-Order Excitation Mechanism in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
19
(
4
), pp.
704
712
.10.2514/2.6160
2.
Gambitta
,
M.
,
Kühhorn
,
A.
, and
Schrape
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Geometrical Variability Modelling of Axial Compressor Blisk Aerofoils and Evaluation of Impact on the Forced Response Problem
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2020-16168.10.1115/GT2020-16168
3.
Gambitta
,
M.
,
Kühhorn
,
A.
,
Beirow
,
B.
, and
Schrape
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Stator Blades Manufacturing Geometrical Variability in Axial Compressors and Impact on the Aeroelastic Excitation Forces
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
144
(
4
), p.
041007
.10.1115/1.4052602
4.
Gambitta
,
M.
,
Beirow
,
B.
, and
Schrape
,
S.
,
2024
, “
Modeling Method for Aeroelastic Low Engine Order Excitation Originating From Upstream Vanes' Geometrical Variability
,”
Int. J. Turbomach., Propul. Power
,
9
(
2
), p.
12
.10.3390/ijtpp9020012
5.
Pérez Escobar
,
Ó.
,
Timón
,
V.
, and
Gallardo
,
J. M.
,
2025
, “
Numerical Study of Low Engine Order Excitations Due to Manufacturing Variability Part I: Characterization of the Geometric Scatter and Its Effect on Forced Response Studies
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
, 147(6), p. 061003.10.1115/1.4066585
6.
Garzon
,
V. E.
, and
Darmofal
,
D. L.
,
2003
, “
Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(
4
), pp.
692
703
.10.1115/1.1622715
7.
Corral
,
R.
,
Crespo
,
J.
, and
Gisbert
,
F.
,
2004
, “
Parallel Multigrid Unstructured Method for the Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-0761.10.2514/6.2004-0761
8.
Gisbert
,
F.
,
Corral
,
R.
, and
Pastor
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Implementation of an Edge-Based Navier-Stokes Solver for Unstructured Grids in Graphics Processing Units
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT011-46224.10.1115/GT011-46224
9.
Gisbert
,
F.
, and
Corral
,
R.
,
2016
, “
A Novel Mixing Plane Method Using Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Multirow Analysis in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
7
), p.
071009
.10.1115/1.4032539
10.
Corral
,
R.
,
Escribano
,
A.
,
Gisbert
,
F.
,
Serrano
,
A.
, and
Vasco
,
C.
,
2003
, “
Validation of a Linear Multigrid Accelerated Unstructured Navier-Stokes Solver for the Computation of Turbine Blades on Hybrid Grids
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2003-3326.10.2514/6.2003-3326
11.
Gallardo
,
J. M.
,
Sotillo
,
A.
, and
Bermejo
,
O.
,
2019
, “
Study of the Effect of the Scatter of Acoustic Modes on Turbine Flutter
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
141
(
10
), p.
101010
.10.1115/1.4043909
12.
Serrano González
,
A.
, and
Fernández Aparicio
,
J. R.
,
2016
, “
Turbine Tone Noise Prediction Using a Linearized CFD Solver: Comparison With Measurements
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
6
), p.
061006
.10.1115/1.4032285
13.
Corral
,
R.
,
Gallardo
,
J. M.
, and
Vasco
,
C.
,
2007
, “
Aeroelastic Stability of Welded-in-Pair Low Pressure Turbine Rotor Blades: A Comparative Study Using Linear Methods
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
129
(
1
), pp.
72
83
.10.1115/1.2366512
14.
Moffatt
,
S.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2009
, “
Blade Forced Response Prediction for Industrial Gas Turbines: Part 1 – Methodologies
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38640.10.1115/GT2003-38640
15.
Armstrong
,
E. K.
,
1988
, “
Fatigue and Assessment Methods of Blade Vibration
,”
AGARD Manual on Aeroelasticity in Axial-Flow Turbomachines, Volume 2: Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity
,
Platzer Max
,
F.
, and
Carta
,
F. O.
(eds.), Chap. 16,
AGARD
.
16.
Serrano
,
A.
,
Fernandez-Aparicio
,
J.
, and
Iriondo
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Noise Testing and Prediction of a 3-Stage High Speed Turbine for UltraFan(R)
,”
16th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics
, Toledo, Spain, Paper No.
ISUAAAT16-7
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364029150_Noise_Testing_and_Prediction_of_a_3-stage_High_Speed_Turbine_for_UltraFanR
17.
Pinelli
,
L.
,
Poli
,
F.
,
Arnone
,
A.
,
Guerin
,
S.
,
Holewa
,
A.
,
Fernendez-Aparicio
,
J.
,
Puente
,
R.
,
Torzo
,
D.
,
Favre
,
C.
, et al.,
2015
, “
On the Numerical Evaluation of Tone Noise Emissions Generated by a Turbine Stage: An In-Depth Comparison Among Different Computational Methods
,”
ASME
No. GT2015-42376.
18.
Martel
,
C.
, and
Cuiping
,
L.
,
2016
, “Maximum Mistuned Vibration Amplitude With Aerodynamic Damping.”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57000.10.1115/GT2016-57000
19.
Petrov
,
E. P.
, and
Ewins
,
D. J.
,
2005
, “
Effects of Damping and Varying Contact Area at Blade-Disc Joints in Forced Response Analysis of Bladed Disc Assemblies
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68936.10.1115/GT2005-68936
You do not currently have access to this content.