Abstract

Variable pitch fans (VPFs) can improve the operability of low pressure ratio fan systems by repitching the rotor blades. If a variable pitch fan can generate sufficient reverse thrust on landing, it will also eliminate the need for heavy, cascade-type thrust reversers. However, any reverse thrust generation is impacted by high levels of inlet distortion generated as air is drawn into the exhaust nozzle. This paper uses both Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) computations and low-speed rig experiments to explore how a representative inlet distortion from the engine installation affects the aerodynamics and performance of a variable pitch fan operating in reverse thrust mode. The simulations and the experiments both show that the distortion from the engine installation leads to a highly three-dimensional flow field with a large recirculation region within the bypass duct. This is in contrast to the primarily axial flow that is produced for a case with uniform freestream inlet conditions. The distortion substantially redistributes the mass flow, thrust, and power in the engine. Streamline tracking combined with a power balance analysis reveals that there is highly radial flow within the fan rotor and almost all of the power from the fan is used to drive the recirculating flow in the bypass duct, which generates high loss and has a high total temperature. The recirculation reduces the net mass flow through the engine to around 5% of a uniform inflow case and the effective reverse thrust is greatly reduced. With uniform inflow, the net reverse thrust was found to be 35% of the nominal takeoff thrust. With inlet distortion present, this was reduced to 20%. This demonstrates the importance of designing and operating variable pitch fan systems to minimize the reverse thrust inlet distortion.

References

1.
Holcombe
,
V.
,
2003
, “
Aero-Propulsion Technology (APT) Task V-Low Noise ADP Engine Definition Study
,” NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No.
NASA CR-2003-212521
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040000734
2.
Reemsnyder
,
D. C.
, and
Sagerser
,
D. A.
,
1979
, “
Reverse Thrust Performance of a Variable-Pitch Fan Engine at Forward Velocity
,”
J. Aircr.
,
16
(
12
), pp.
848
855
.10.2514/3.58612
3.
Rajendran
,
D. J.
, and
Pachidis
,
V.
,
2019
, “
Fan Flow Field in an Installed Variable Pitch Fan Operating in Reverse Thrust for a Range of Aircraft Landing Speeds
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
141
(
10
), p.
101018
.10.1115/1.4044686
4.
Williams
,
T. S.
,
2019
, “
Variable Pitch Fan Aerodynamics
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
Cambridge University
, Cambridge, UK.10.17863/CAM.43280
5.
Kovich
,
G.
, and
Moore
,
R. D.
,
1976
, “
Performance of 1.15-Pressure Ratio Fan Stage at Several Rotor Blade Setting Angles With Reverse Flow
,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No.
NASA TM X-3451
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770004065
6.
Moore
,
R. D.
, and
Kovich
,
G.
,
1976
, “
Aerodynamic Performance of Two Variable-Pitch Fan Stages
,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No.
NASA TM X-73416
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760019066
7.
Ma
,
K. Y.
,
2022
, “
Installation Effects on Variable Pitch Fans
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Cambridge University
,
Cambridge, UK
.
8.
Williams
,
T. S.
, and
Hall
,
C. A.
,
2019
, “
Reverse Thrust Aerodynamics of Variable Pitch Fans
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
141
(
8
), p.
081008
.10.1115/1.4043139
9.
Giffin
,
R. G.
,
McFalls
,
R. A.
, and
Beacher
,
B. F.
,
1977
, “
Quiet Clean Short-Haul Experimental Engine (QCSEE) Aerodynamic and Aeromechanical Performance of a 50.8 cm (20 in.) Diameter 1.34 PR Variable Pitch Fan With Core Flow
,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No.
NASA CR-135017
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800006828
10.
Hobbs
,
D. E.
,
Neubert
,
R. J.
,
Malmborg
,
E. W.
,
Philbrick
,
D. H.
, and
Spear
,
D. A.
,
1995
, “
Low Noise Research Fan Stage Design
,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No.
NASA-CR-195382
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990095609/downloads/19990095609.pdf
11.
Brandvik
,
T.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
,
2010
, “
An Accelerated 3D Navier-Stokes Solver for Flows in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
2
), p.
021025
.10.1115/1.4001192
12.
NUMECA International
,
2014
,
User Manual, AutoGrid5TM v9
,
NUMECA International
,
Brussels, Belgium
.
13.
Taylor
,
J. V.
,
2019
, “
Complete Flow Conditioning Gauzes
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
60
(
3
), p.
35
.10.1007/s00348-019-2682-9
14.
Roach
,
P. E.
,
1987
, “
The Generation of Nearly Isotropic Turbulence by Means of Grids
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
8
(
2
), pp.
82
92
.10.1016/0142-727X(87)90001-4
15.
Ayachit
,
U.
,
2017
, The ParaView Guide, Kitware, Inc., New York.
16.
Rajendran
,
D. J.
,
Tunstall
,
R.
, and
Pachidis
,
V.
,
2022
, “
Estimation of Resultant Airframe Forces for a Variable Pitch Fan Operating in Reverse Thrust Mode
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
144
(
12
), p.
121017
.10.1115/1.4055489
You do not currently have access to this content.