Abstract

To save resources and reduce emissions, it is crucial to reduce weight of aircraft engines and further increase aerodynamic efficiency of gas and steam turbines. For turbine blades, these goals often lead to flutter. Thus, innovative flutter-tolerant designs are explored, where flutter induces limit cycle oscillations (LCOs) of tolerable yet nonzero levels. Flutter represents a self-excitation mechanism and, in the linear case, would lead to exponential divergence. Flutter-induced LCOs are therefore an inherently nonlinear phenomenon. The saturation of flutter-induced vibrations can be caused by nonlinear frictional contact interactions, e.g., in tip shroud interfaces. To develop flutter-tolerant designs, efficient methods are required which compute LCOs based on an appropriate modeling of elastic, inertia, aerodynamic, and contact forces. We recently developed a Frequency Domain Fluid-Structure Interaction (FD-FSI) solver for flutter-induced LCOs. The solver relies on the Harmonic Balance method applied to the structure as well as the fluid domain. It was shown that especially for long and slender blades with friction in shroud interfaces and strong aerodynamic influence, a coupled analysis can significantly increase the accuracy of predicted LCOs compared to the current state-of-the-art methods. Conventional methods do not properly account for the nonlinear change of frequency and deflection shape, and the effect of these changes on the aerodynamic damping, and thus fail in predicting certain LCOs at all. In the current work, the FD-FSI solver is numerically validated against Time Domain Fluid-Structure Interaction (TD-FSI) simulations. As a test case, a shrouded low-pressure turbine with friction in the shroud interfaces is considered. The point of operation is highly loaded and transonic in order to make the test case challenging. Apart from a successful validation of the FD-FSI solver, we shed light on important advantages and disadvantages of both solvers. Due to the lack of robust phase-lag boundary conditions for time domain solvers, a full blade row must be simulated. Thus, the FD-FSI solver typically requires only a fraction of the computational costs. Moreover, the FD-FSI solver contributes to an increased physical understanding of the coupled vibrations: By analyzing the contribution of individual harmonics, we analyze why unexpected even harmonics appear in a certain LCO. On the other hand, the FD-FSI solver does not provide information on the asymptotic stability of the LCOs and is strictly limited to periodic oscillations. Indeed, quasi-periodic limit torus oscillations (LTOs) appear in our test case. Using the TD-FSI solver, we confirm the internal combination resonance, postulated recently as necessary condition for LTOs, for the first time, in a fully coupled analysis.

References

1.
Carta
,
F. O.
,
1967
, “
Coupled Blade-Disk-Shroud Flutter Instabilities in Turbojet Engine Rotors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
89
(
3
), pp.
419
426
.10.1115/1.3616708
2.
Waite
,
J. J.
, and
Kielb
,
R. E.
,
2016
, “
The Impact of Blade Loading and Unsteady Pressure Bifurcations on Low-Pressure Turbine Flutter Boundaries
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
4
), p.
041002
.10.1115/1.4032043
3.
Waite
,
J. J.
, and
Kielb
,
R. E.
,
2016
, “
Shock Structure, Mode Shape, and Geometric Considerations for Low-Pressure Turbine Flutter Suppression
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56706.10.1115/GT2016-56706
4.
Firrone
,
C. M.
, and
Zucca
,
S.
,
2011
, “
Modelling Friction Contacts in Structural Dynamics and Its Application to Turbine Bladed Disks
,”
Numerical Analysis–Theory and Application
, Jan Awrejcewicz, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland,
14
, pp.
301
334
.10.5772/25128
5.
Lassalle
,
M.
, and
Firrone
,
C.
,
2018
, “
A Parametric Study of Limit Cycle Oscillation of a Bladed Disk Caused by Flutter and Friction at the Blade Root Joints
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
76
, pp.
349
366
.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.10.004
6.
Martel
,
C.
,
Corral
,
R.
, and
Ivaturi
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Flutter Amplitude Saturation by Nonlinear Friction Forces: Reduced Model Verification
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
4
), p.
041004
.10.1115/1.4028443
7.
Berthold
,
C.
,
Gross
,
J.
,
Frey
,
C.
, and
Krack
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Analysis of Friction-Saturated Flutter Vibrations With a Fully Coupled Frequency Domain Method
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
142
(
11
), p.
111007
.10.1115/1.4048650
8.
González-Monge
,
J.
,
Rodríguez-Blanco
,
S.
, and
Martel
,
C.
,
2021
, “
Friction-Induced Traveling Wave Coupling in Tuned Bladed-Disks
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
,
106
(
4
), pp.
2963
2973
.10.1007/s11071-021-06930-1
9.
Woiwode
,
L.
,
Gross
,
J.
, and
Krack
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Effect of Modal Interactions on Friction-Damped Self-Excited Vibrations
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
143
(
3
), p.
031003
.10.1115/1.4048396
10.
Gross
,
J.
, and
Krack
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Multi-Wave Vibration Caused by Flutter Instability and Nonlinear Tip-Shroud Friction
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
142
(
2
), p.
021013
.10.1115/1.4044884
11.
Berthold
,
C.
,
Frey
,
C.
,
Dhondt
,
G.
, and
Schönenborn
,
H.
,
2018
, “
Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Simulations of Limit Cycle Oscillations in the Time Domain
,”
Proceedings of the 15th ISUAAAT
, Oxford, UK, Sept. 24–27, Paper No. 61.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330738403_FULLY_COUPLED_AEROELASTIC_SIMULATIONS_OF_LIMIT_CYCLE_OSCILLATIONS_IN_THE_TIME_DOMAIN
12.
Schlüß
,
D.
, and
Frey
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Time Domain Flutter Simulations of a Steam Turbine Stage Using Sptectral 2D Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions
,”
15th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity Turbomachines
, Oxford, UK, Sept. 24–27, Paper No. 65.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329758473_Time_Domain_Flutter_Simulations_of_a_Steam_Turbine_Stage_Using_Sptectral_2D_Non-Reflecting_Boundary_Conditions
13.
Henninger
,
S.
,
Jeschke
,
P.
,
Ashcroft
,
G.
, and
Kügeler
,
E.
,
2015
, “
Time-Domain Implementation of Higher-Order Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions for Turbomachinery Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42362.10.1115/GT2015-42362
14.
Berthold
,
C.
,
Gross
,
J.
,
Frey
,
C.
, and
Krack
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Development of a Fully-Coupled Harmonic Balance Method and a Refined Energy Method for the Computation of Flutter-Induced Limit Cycle Oscillations of Bladed Disks With Nonlinear Friction Contacts
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
102
, p.
103233
.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103233
15.
Krack
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Nonlinear Modal Analysis of Nonconservative Systems: Extension of the Periodic Motion Concept
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
154
, pp.
59
71
.10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.03.008
16.
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
Frey
,
C.
, and
Kersken
,
H.-P.
,
2014
, “
On the Development of a Harmonic Balance Method for Aeroelastic Analysis
,” 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (
ECFD VI
), Barcelona, Spain, July 20–25, pp.
5885
5896
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265414877_On_the_development_of_a_harmonic_balance_method_for_aeroelastic_analysis
17.
Krack
,
M.
, and
Gross
,
J.
,
2019
,
Harmonic Balance for Nonlinear Vibration Problems
,
Springer
, Stuttgart, Germany.
18.
Craig
,
R. R.
, and
Bampton
,
M. C.
,
1968
, “
Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analyses
,”
AIAA J.
,
6
(
7
), pp.
1313
1319
.10.2514/3.4741
19.
Corral
,
R.
, and
Gallardo
,
J. M.
,
2014
, “
Nonlinear Dynamics of Bladed Disks With Multiple Unstable Modes
,”
AIAA J.
,
52
(
6
), pp.
1124
1132
.10.2514/1.J051812
20.
Krack
,
M.
,
Salles
,
L.
, and
Thouverez
,
F.
,
2017
, “
Vibration Prediction of Bladed Disks Coupled by Friction Joints
,”
Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.
,
24
(
3
), pp.
589
636
.10.1007/s11831-016-9183-2
21.
Woiwode
,
L.
,
Vakakis
,
A. F.
, and
Krack
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Analysis of the Non-Periodic Oscillations of a Self-Excited Friction-Damped System With Closely Spaced Modes
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
,
106
(
3
), pp.
1659
1673
.10.1007/s11071-021-06893-3
22.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
1988
, “
Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
,
26
(
11
), pp.
1299
1310
.10.2514/3.10041
23.
Kersken
,
H.-P.
,
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
Frey
,
C.
,
Wolfrum
,
N.
, and
Korte
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Aeroelastic Analysis in Time and Frequency Domain 3D RANS Solvers
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25499.10.1115/GT2014-25499
24.
Srinivasan
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Flutter and Resonant Vibration Characteristics of Engine Blades
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
119
(
4
), pp.
742
775
.10.1115/1.2817053
25.
Berthold
,
C.
,
Frey
,
C.
, and
Schönenborn
,
H.
,
2018
, “
Coupled Fluid Structure Simulation Method in the Frequency Domain for Turbomachinery Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2018-76220.10.1115/GT2018-76220
26.
Newmark
,
N. M.
,
1959
, “
A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics
,”
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
,
85
(
3
), pp.
67
94
.10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098
27.
Engels-Putzka
,
A.
,
Backhaus
,
J.
, and
Frey
,
C.
,
2014
, “
On the Usage of Finite Differences for the Development of Discrete Linearised and Adjoint CFD Solvers
,”
Proceedings of the 6th. European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics - ECFD VI
,
E.
Oñate
,
X.
Oliver
, and
A.
Huerta
, eds., Barcelona, Spain, July 20–25, pp.
5058
5070
.https://elib.dlr.de/90138/1/Engels-Putzka_2014_ECCOMAS.pdf
28.
Orszag
,
S. A.
,
1971
, “
Elimination of Aliasing in Finite Difference Schemes by Filtering High-Wavenumber Components
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
,
28
(
6
), pp.
1074
1074
.10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<1074:OTEOAI>2.0.CO;2
29.
Frey
,
C.
,
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
Kersken
,
H.-P.
, and
Voigt
,
C.
,
2014
, “
A Harmonic Balance Technique for Multistage Turbomachinery Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25230.10.1115/GT2014-25230
You do not currently have access to this content.