Abstract

The presence of a crack in a blade can change the natural frequencies of that blade. It has long been a goal to detect blade cracks by assessing the change in a measured vibration frequency of the blade over time. It has been found that prior frequency assessment methods can be less accurate than is desirable to reliably detect the relatively small frequency changes that are typically associated with blade crack sizes of practical interest. This paper describes a method in which potential temporal changes in the frequencies of individual blades are assessed by periodically analyzing complete rows of blades using mistuning analysis techniques that treat the blade rows as coupled systems, in contrast to other techniques that consider each blade individually in turn. This method, while computationally complicated and challenging, has been found to be capable of detecting blade root cracks that are much smaller than those that can be detected using other techniques. Moreover, this method has been demonstrated to detect cracks that are much smaller than the critical size for mechanical separation of the blade from the rotor. This improved frequency assessment technique has been used to identify more than 30 blades with frequency changes that were considered to be potential indicators of blade cracks. Subsequent inspections verified indications in all of those blades. In addition to providing operational guidance, the frequency change data were used to infer the time periods during which crack growth had occurred.

References

1.
Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited
, 2022, “
2014 Annual Report
,” Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, Hamilton, Bermuda, accessed Nov. 7, 2022, https://www.myneil.com/getmedia/2125cdd5-0faf-4940-acf1-300a36a41686/i-annual-reports-2014-neil-2014-ar-financials-final.pdf
2.
Rozelle
,
P. F.
,
Evans
,
D. H.
, and
Seth
,
B. B.
,
1989
, “
Development and Application of a Blade Vibration Monitor
,” Latest Advances in Steam Turbine Design, Blading, Repairs, Assessment, and Condenser Interaction, Vol. 7,
ASME, New York.
3.
Bates
,
R. C.
,
Cunningham
,
J. W.
,
Dowling
,
N. E.
,
Heymann
,
F. J.
,
Jonas
,
O.
,
Kunsman
,
L. D.
,
Pebler
,
A. R.
,
Swaminathan
,
V. P.
,
Willertz
,
L. E.
, and
Rust
,
T. M.
,
1984
, “
Corrosion Fatigue of Steam Turbine-Blading Alloys in Operational Environments
,” Electric Power Research InstitutePalo Alto, CA, Report No.
EPRI CS-2932
.https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6363865
4.
Abrego
,
L.
, and
Begley
,
J. A.
,
1980
, “
Fatigue Crack Propagation of 403 Stainless Steel in Aqueous Solutions at 100 °C
,” Presented at Corrosion/80, Chicago, IL, Mar. 3–7, Paper No. 235.
5.
Leon
,
R. L.
, and
Armor
,
A. F.
,
1982
, “
Detecting Resonant Blade Vibrations in Turbines
,”
Incipient Failure Detection Fossil Power Plant Compon.
, EPRI CS-2920, pp.
6
1
6-30
.
6.
von Flotow
,
A.
, and
Tappert
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Commercial Technologies for Turbomachinery Rotor Health Monitoring
,” Electric Power Research InstitutePalo Alto, CA, Report No. EPRI 1014143, pp.
2
1
2-15
.
7.
Griffin
,
J. H.
, and
Feiner
,
D. M.
,
2006
, “
Fundamental Mistuning Model for Determining System Properties and Predicting Vibratory Response of Bladed Disks
,” US Patent US 7,082,371.https://patents.google.com/patent/US20070083338
8.
Griffin
,
J. H.
, and
Feiner
,
D. M.
,
2008
, “
Fundamental Mistuning Model for Determining System Properties and Predicting Vibratory Response of Bladed Disks
,” US Patent US 7,383,136 B1.
9.
Heinig
,
R. W.
,
Griffin
,
J. H.
, and
Feiner
,
D. M.
,
2017
, “
Method and System for Monitoring Rotating Blade Health
,” US Patent US 9,739,167 B2.https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140030092A1/en
10.
Castanier
,
M. P.
, and
Pierre
,
C.
,
2006
, “
Modeling and Analysis of Mistuned Bladed Disk Vibration: Status and Emerging Directions
,”
AIAA J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
2
), pp.
384
396
.10.2514/1.16345
11.
Feiner
,
D. M.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
2002
, “
A Fundamental Model of Mistuning for a Single Family of Modes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
4
), pp.
597
605
.10.1115/1.1508384
12.
Feiner
,
D. M.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
2004
, “
Mistuning Identification of Bladed Disks Using a Fundamental Mistuning Model—Part I: Theory
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(
1
), pp.
150
158
.10.1115/1.1643913
13.
Feiner
,
D. M.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
2004
, “
Mistuning Identification of Bladed Disks Using a Fundamental Mistuning Model—Part II: Application
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(
1
), pp.
159
165
.10.1115/1.1643914
14.
Siewert
,
C.
, and
Stüer
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Forced Response Analysis of Mistuned Bladings
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-23782.10.1115/GT2010-23782
15.
European Fitness-for-Service Network
,
2008
,
FITNET FFS Procedure
,
Rev. MK8
, European Fitness-for-Service Network.
16.
BSI
,
2019
,
Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures
, Vol.
7910
, British Standards Institution, London, U
K
.
17.
ASME and API
,
2016
,
Fitness-For-Service
,
ASME and API
, API Publishing Services, Washington, DC, Standard No. Api 579-1/ASME FFS-1-2016.
18.
Anderson
,
T. L.
,
2017
,
Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
, 4th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
19.
Almstedt
,
H.
,
Kern
,
T.-U.
,
Segletes
,
D.
, and
Loehr
,
M.
,
2016
, “
The Role of Advanced Fracture Mechanics Evaluation Methods for Turbine Components
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57339.10.1115/GT2016-57339
You do not currently have access to this content.