Abstract

Diesel-fueled engines still hold a large market share in the medium and heavy-duty transportation sector. However, the increase in fossil fuel prices and the strict emission regulations are leading engine manufacturers to seek cleaner alternatives without a compromise in performance. Alcohol-based fuels, such as ethanol, offer a promising alternative to diesel fuel in meeting regulatory demands. Ethanol provides cleaner combustion and lower levels of soot due to its chemical properties, in particular its lower level of carbon content. In addition, the stoichiometric operating conditions of alcohol fueled engines enable the mitigation of NOx emissions in aftertreatment stage. With the promise of retrofitting diesel engines to run on ethanol to reduce emissions, the thermal efficiency of these engines remains the primary optimization target. In order to find the optimal ethanol-fueled engine design that maximizes the thermal efficiency, a large design space needs to be investigated using engineering tools. In this study, previous research by the authors on optimizing the design of a single-cylinder ethanol-fueled engine was extended to explore the design space for a heavy-duty multicylinder engine configuration. A heavy-duty engine setup with multiple operating conditions at different engine speeds and loads was considered. A design optimization analysis was performed to identify the potential designs that maximize the indicated thermal efficiency in an ethanol-fueled compression ignition engine. First, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the engine was validated using experimental data for four drive cycle points. Using a design of experiments (DoE) approach and a parameterized piston bowl geometry, the model was then exercised to explore the relationship among geometric features of the piston bowl and spray targeting angle and indicated thermal efficiency across all tested operating conditions. After evaluating 165 candidate designs, a piston bowl geometry was identified that yielded an increase between 1.3% and 2.2% points in indicated thermal efficiency for all tested conditions, while satisfying the operational design constraints for peak pressure and maximum pressure rise rate. The increased performance was attributed to enhance mixing that led to the formation of a more homogeneous distribution of in-cylinder temperature and equivalence ratio, higher combustion temperatures, and shorter combustion duration. Finally, a Bayesian optimization (BOpt) analysis was employed to find the optimal piston bowl geometry with a fixed spray injector angle for one of the operating conditions. Using BOpt, a piston candidate was identified that resulted in a 1.9% point increase in thermal efficiency from the baseline design, yet only required 65% of the design samples investigated using the DoE approach.

References

1.
Global Market Insights Inc.
,
2019
, “
Global Market Insights, Marine Diesel Engine Market Size by Technology and Application, Industry Analysis Report for 2020–2026
,”
Global Market Insights Inc.
,
Selbyvelle, Delaware
, accessed July 4, 2023, https://www.gminsights.com/
2.
Hua
,
Y.
,
Liu
,
F.
,
Wu
,
H.
,
Lee
,
C.-F.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2021
, “
Effects of Alcohol Addition to Traditional Fuels on Soot Formation: A Review
,”
Int. J. Engine Res.
,
22
(
5
), pp.
1395
1420
.10.1177/1468087420910886
3.
Chase
,
S. A.
,
Nevin
,
R. M.
,
Winsor
,
R. E.
, and
Baumgard
,
K. J.
,
2007
, “
Stoichiometric Compression Ignition (SCI) Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 2007-01-4224. 10.4271/2007-01-4224
4.
Yates
,
A.
,
Bell
,
A.
, and
Swarts
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Insights Relating to the Autoignition Characteristics of Alcohol Fuels
,”
Fuel
,
89
(
1
), pp.
83
93
.10.1016/j.fuel.2009.06.037
5.
Natarajan
,
K.
, and
Bhaskaran
,
K.
,
1981
, “
An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of High Temperature Ignition of Ethanol
,”
Indian Institute of Technology
,
Madras, Tamilnadu
, India.
6.
Blumreiter
,
J.
,
Johnson
,
B. H.
,
Zhou
,
A.
,
Magnotti
,
G. M.
,
Longman
,
D.
, and
Som
,
S.
, “
Mixing-Limited Combustion of Alcohol Fuels in a Diesel Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 2019-01-0552. 10.4271/2019-01-0552
7.
Magnotti
,
G. M.
,
Mohapatra
,
C. K.
,
Mashayekh
,
A.
,
Wijeyakulasuriya
,
S.
,
Schanz
,
R.
,
Blumreiter
,
J.
,
Johnson
,
B.
, et al.,
2021
, “
Development of an Efficient Conjugate Heat Transfer Modeling Framework to Optimize Mixing-Limited Combustion of Ethanol in a Diesel Engine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
143
(
9
), p.
091008
.10.1115/1.4050914
8.
Yan
,
Z.
,
Gainey
,
B.
,
Gohn
,
J.
,
Hariharan
,
D.
,
Saputo
,
J.
,
Schmidt
,
C.
, and
Caliari
,
F.
, et al,
2021
, “
A Comprehensive Experimental Investigation of Low-Temperature Combustion With Thick Thermal Barrier Coatings
,”
Energy
,
222
, p.
119954
.10.1016/j.energy.2021.119954
9.
Pei
,
Y.
,
Pal
,
P.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Traver
,
M.
,
Cleary
,
D.
,
Futterer
,
C.
, and
Brenner
,
M.
, et al,
2019
, “
CFD-Guided Combustion System Optimization of a Gasoline Range Fuel in a Heavy-Duty Compression Ignition Engine Using Automatic Piston Geometry Generation and a Supercomputer
,” SAE Paper No. 2019-01-0001. 10.4271/2019-01-0001
10.
Moiz
,
A. A.
,
Pal
,
P.
,
Probst
,
D.
,
Pei
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Som
,
S.
, and
Kodavasal
,
J.
,
2018
, “
A Machine Learning-Genetic Algorithm (ML-GA) Approach for Rapid Optimization Using High-Performance Computing
,”
SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh.
,
11
(
5
), pp.
291
306
.10.4271/2018-01-0190
11.
Owoyele
,
O.
,
Pal
,
P.
,
Torreira
,
A. V.
,
Probst
,
D.
,
Shaxted
,
M.
,
Wilde
,
M.
, and
Senecal
,
P. K.
,
2022
, “
Application of an Automated Machine Learning-Genetic Algorithm (AutoML-GA) Coupled With Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations for Rapid Engine Design Optimization
,”
Int. J. Engine Res.
,
23
(
9
), pp.
1586
1601
.10.1177/14680874211023466
12.
Owoyele
,
O.
, and
Pal
,
P.
,
2021
, “
A Novel Machine Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm (ActivO) for Accelerating Simulation-Driven Engine Design
,”
Appl. Energy
,
285
, p.
116455
.10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116455
13.
Badra
,
J. A.
,
Khaled
,
F.
,
Tang
,
M.
,
Pei
,
Y.
,
Kodavasal
,
J.
,
Pal
,
P.
,
Owoyele
,
O.
,
Fuetterer
,
C.
,
Mattia
,
B.
, and
Aamir
,
F.
,
2021
, “
Engine Combustion System Optimization Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Machine Learning: A Methodological Approach
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
143
(
2
), p.
022306
.10.1115/1.4047978
14.
Richards
,
K. J.
,
Senecal
,
P. K.
, and
Pomraning
,
E.
,
2021
,
Converge 3.0. Convergent Science
,
Madison
,
WI
.
15.
Reitz
,
R.
,
1987
, “
Modeling Atomization Processes in High-Pressure Vaporizing Sprays
,”
Atomisation Spray Technol.
,
3
(
4
), pp.
309
337
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234279474_Modeling_atomization_processes_in_highpressure_vaporizing_sprays
16.
Reitz
,
R. D.
, and
Beale
,
J. C.
,
1999
, “
Modeling Spray Atomization With the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor Hybrid Model
,”
Atomization Sprays
,
9
(
6
), pp.
623
650
.10.1615/AtomizSpr.v9.i6.40
17.
Schmidt
,
D. P.
, and
Rutland
,
C. J.
,
2000
, “
A New Droplet Collision Algorithm
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
164
(
1
), pp.
62
80
.10.1006/jcph.2000.6568
18.
Frössling
,
N.
, “
Evaporation, Heat Transfer and Velocity Distribution in Two-Dimensional and Rotationally Symmetrical Laminar Boundary-Layer Flow
,” NACA Report No.
ADB1891
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20030068788
19.
Wang
,
H.
,
Dempsey
,
A.
,
Yao
,
M.
,
Jia
,
M.
, and
Reitz
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Kinetic and Numerical Study on the Effects of di-Tert-Butyl Peroxide Additive on the Reactivity of Methanol and Ethanol
,”
Energy Fuels
,
28
(
8
), pp.
5480
5488
.10.1021/ef500867p
20.
Jankovic
,
A.
,
Chaudhary
,
G.
, and
Goia
,
F.
,
2021
, “
Designing the Design of Experiments (DOE) – an Investigation on the Influence of Different Factorial Designs on the Characterization of Complex Systems
,”
Energy Build.
,
250
, p.
111298
.10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111298
21.
CAESES
,
2021
, “
CAESES Software
,” CAESES, Potsdam, Germany, accessed July 4, 2023, https://www.caeses.com
22.
McKay
,
M. D.
,
Beckman
,
R. J.
, and
Conover
,
W. J.
,
1979
, “
A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code
,”
Technometrics
,
21
(
2
), pp.
239
245
.10.2307/1268522
23.
Deaconu
,
S.
, and
Coleman
,
H. W.
,
2000
, “
Limitations of Statistical Design of Experiments Approaches in Engineering Testing
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
254
259
.10.1115/1.483252
24.
Dogan
,
G. L.
,
Demir
,
S. O.
,
Gutzler
,
R.
,
Gruhn
,
H.
,
Dayan
,
C. B.
,
Sanli
,
U. T.
,
Silber
,
C.
, and
et al
.,
2021
, “
Bayesian Machine Learning for Efficient Minimization of Defects in ALd Passivation Layers
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
,
13
(
45
), pp.
54503
54515
.10.1021/acsami.1c14586
25.
Mondal
,
S.
,
Magnotti
,
G. M.
,
Lusch
,
B.
,
Maulik
,
R.
, and
Torelli
,
R.
,
2021
, “
Machine Learning-Enabled Prediction of Transient Injection Map in Automotive Injectors With Uncertainty Quantification
,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2021-67888.10.1115/ICEF2021-67888
26.
Rasmussen
,
C.
, and
Williams
,
C.
,
2005
,
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
(Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning series),
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
.
27.
Garnett
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Lecture Notes in Bayesian Methods in Machine Learning
,” accessed July 4, 2023, https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~garnett/cse515t/spring_2015/
28.
GitHub
,
2016
, “
GPyOpt: A Bayesian Optimization framework in Python
,” GitHub, accessed July 4, 2023, http://github.com/SheffieldML/GPyOpt
29.
Molga
,
M.
, and
Smutnicki
,
C.
,
2005
, “
Test Functions for Optimization Needs
”.https://robertmarks.org/Classes/ENGR5358/Papers/functions.pdf
30.
González
,
J.
,
Dai
,
Z.
,
Hennig
,
P.
, and
Lawrence
,
N. D.
,
2015
, “
Batch Bayesian Optimization Via Local Penalization
,” Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR.http://proceedings.mlr.press/v51/gonzalez16a.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.