Abstract

The breakup of liquid films in high-speed flows is found in many applications. These include prefilming air blast atomization found in fuel injectors and shedding of droplet off of airfoils. In this work, a test rig has been developed and applied to study the breakup of water films from the trailing edge of an NACA 0012 airfoil placed in a high-speed air flow. The results provided reflect a new detailed dataset focused on air velocities above 75 m/s. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations were used to guide the development of the rig and the associated boundary and inlet conditions. In this work, air velocities up to 175 m/s were used with water films between 0.4 cm2/s and 3.6 cm2/s. The water film was introduced onto one surface through a series of 0.5 mm holes separated by 1 mm at a location 35 mm downstream of the leading edge of the vane. High speed video was used to document the sheet breakup behavior from the edge of the airfoil. Image analysis was used to identify the breakup length of ligaments formed. Laser diffraction was used 50 mm downstream of the trailing edge of the vane to determine the droplet size distribution and associated representative average diameters generated. A series of test conditions were run between 50 m/s and 175 m/s using multilevel factorial designed experiments. The results obtained were subjected to analysis of variance to generate correlations for breakup length and droplet representative diameters as a function of the conditions studied. The analysis was conducted on dimensionless versions of the variables studied to help connect the results to the physics of the situation. For example, rather than using air velocity to correlate the behavior, the Weber number (based on gas phase density and velocity) was used owing to its historical ability to describe liquid breakup processes. The results obtained are compared with other studies in the literature, and good agreement was found for the conditions at which a comparison could be made. It is observed that, for the conditions studied, liquid film thickness has little effect on the resulting droplet sizes—especially for the higher air velocity cases studied. The results also illustrate the sensitivity to choice of the characteristic length, which is generally consisted of trailing edge geometry or boundary layer thickness. In contrast, liquid film does influence the ligament breakup length, although the time to break up is less affected. Overall, the correlations developed provide engineering tools to help estimate ligament and drop size behavior for water films shed from airfoils in a high-speed flow.

References

1.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
1980
, “
Airblast Atomization
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
,
6
(
3
), pp.
233
261
.10.1016/0360-1285(80)90017-9
2.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
1992
, “
Energy Considerations in Twin-Fluid Atomization
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
114
(
1
), pp.
89
96
.10.1115/1.2906311
3.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
, and
McDonell
,
V. G.
,
2017
,
Atomization and Sprays
, 2nd ed.,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
4.
Hammitt
,
F. G.
,
Krzeczkowski
,
S.
, and
Krzyżanowski
,
J.
,
1981
, “
Liquid Film and Droplet Stability Consideration as Applied to Wet Steam Flow
,”
Forsch. Ingenieurwes.
,
47
(
1
), pp.
1
14
.10.1007/BF02560457
5.
Sattelmayer
,
T.
, and
Wittig
,
S.
,
1986
, “
Internal Flow Effects in Prefilming Airblast Atomizers: Mechanisms of Atomization and Droplet Spectra
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
108
(
3
), pp.
465
472
.10.1115/1.3239931
6.
Bhayaraju
,
U.
, and
Hassa
,
C.
,
2009
, “
Planar Liquid Sheet Breakup of Prefilming and Nonprefilming Atomizers and Elevated Pressure
,”
Atomization Sprays
,
19
(
12
), pp.
1147
1169
.10.1615/AtomizSpr.v19.i12.50
7.
Warncke
,
K.
,
Gepperth
,
S.
,
Sauer
,
B.
,
Sadiki
,
A.
,
Janicka
,
J.
,
Koch
,
R.
, and
Bauer
,
H.-J.
,
2017
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Primary Breakup of an Airblasted Liquid Sheet
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flows
,
91
, pp.
208
224
.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.12.010
8.
Inamura
,
T.
,
Shirota
,
M.
,
Tsushima
,
M.
,
Kato
,
M.
,
Hamajaima
., and
Sato
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Spray Characteristics of Prefilming Type of Airblast Atomizer
,” International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (
ICLASS
) 2012, Heidelberg, Germany, Sept. 2–6.https://www.ilasseurope.org/ICLASS/iclass2012_Heidelberg/Contributions/Paperpdfs/Contribution1259_b.pdf
9.
Inamura
,
T.
,
Kataga
,
N.
,
Nishikawa
,
H.
,
Okabe
,
T.
, and
Fumoto
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Effect of Prefilmer Edge Thickness on Spray Characteristics in Prefilming Airblast Atomization
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
121
, p.
103117
.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103117
10.
SAE International
,
2007
, “Gasoline Fuel Spray Injector Measurement and Characterization,”
SAE International
, Warrendale, PA, Standard No.
J2715-200703
.https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j2715_200703/
11.
Otsu
,
N.
,
1979
, “
A Threshold Selection Method From Gray-Level Histograms
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
62
66
.10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
12.
Huang
,
C.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Wen
,
Y.
,
2021
, “
An Otsu Image Segmentation Based on Fruitfly Optmization Algorithm
,”
Alexandria Eng. J.
,
60
(
1
), pp.
183
188
.10.1016/j.aej.2020.06.054
13.
Gepperth
,
S.
,
Muller
,
A.
,
Koch
,
R.
, and
Bauer
,
H.-J.
,
2012
, “Ligament and Droplet Characteristics in Prefilming Airblast Atomization,” International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (
ICLASS
) 2012, Heidelberg, Germany, Sept. 2–6.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Ligament-and-Droplet-Characteristics-in-Prefilming-Gepperth-M%C3%BCller/29f612f384855611a72af17a7aa29f2766a277ae
14.
Gepperth
,
S.
,
Koch
,
R.
, and
Bauer
,
H.-J.
,
2013
, “
Analysis and Comparison of Primary Droplet Characteristics in the Near Field of a Prefilming Airblast Atomizer
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94033.10.1115/GT2013-94033
15.
Chaussonnet
,
G.
,
Gepperth
,
S.
,
Holz
,
S.
,
Koch
,
R.
, and
Bauer
,
H.-J.
,
2020
, “
Influence of the Ambient Pressure on the Liquid Accumulation and on the Primary Spray in Prefilming Airblast Atomization
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
125
, p.
103229
.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103229
You do not currently have access to this content.