Because of the superior sealing characteristics compared to labyrinth seals, brush seals found an increased spread in turbomachinery in recent years. Their outstanding sealing performance results mainly from their flexibility. Thus, a very small gap between the rotor and bristle package can be obtained without running the risk of severe detrimental deterioration in case of rubbing. Rubbing between rotor and seal during operation might occur as a result of e.g., an unequal thermal expansion of the rotor and stator or a rotor elongation due to centrifugal forces or maneuver forces. Thanks to the flexible structure of the brush seal the contact forces during a rubbing event are reduced; however, the frictional heat input can still be considerable. Particularly, in aircraft engines with their thin and lightweight rotor structures, the permissible material stresses can easily be exceeded by an increased heat input and thus harm the engine's integrity. The geometry of the seal has a decisive influence on the resulting contact forces and consequently the heat input. The complex interactions between the geometric parameters of the seal and the heat input and leakage characteristics are not yet fully understood. This paper presents the investigation of the influence of the geometric parameters of a brush seal on the heat input into the rotor and the leakage behavior. Two seals with different packing densities were tested under relevant engine conditions with pressure differences ranging from 1 to 7 bar, relative surface speeds ranging from 30 to 180 m/s, and radial overlaps ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 mm. The transient temperature rise during the rub event was recorded with 24 thermocouples in close proximity to the rub contact embedded in the rotor structure. By comparing the temperature curves with the results of a thermal finite element (FE) analysis of the rotor the heat input into the rotor was calculated iteratively. It could be shown that the packing density has a decisive influence on the overall operating behavior of a brush seal. Furthermore, results for the heat flux distribution between seal and rotor are shown.

References

References
1.
Steinetz
,
B. M.
, and
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
1996
, “
Engine Seal Technology Requirements to Meet Nasa's Advanced Subsonic Technology Program Goals
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
12
(
4
), pp.
786
793
.
2.
Gail
,
A.
, and
Beichl
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Mtu Brush Seal—Main Features of an Alternative Design
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 00-3375.
3.
Schwarz
,
H.
,
Friedrichs
,
J.
, and
Flegler
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Axial Inclination of the Bristle Pack, a New Design Parameter of Brush Seals for Improved Operational Behavior in Steam Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26330.
4.
Trivedi
,
D.
,
Roy
,
B.
,
Demiroglu
,
M.
, and
Zheng
,
X.
,
2013
, “
Experimental Characterization of Variable Bristle Diameter Brush Seal Leakage, Stiffness and Wear
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-95086.
5.
Demiroglu
,
M.
, and
Tichy
,
J. A.
,
2007
, “
An Investigation of Heat Generation Characteristics of Brush Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-28043.
6.
Pfefferle
,
D.
,
Dullenkopf
,
K.
, and
Bauer
,
H.-J.
,
2011
, “
Design and Validation of a New Test Rig for Brush Seal Testing Under Engine Relevant Conditions
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-45107.
7.
Atkinson
,
E.
, and
Bristol
,
B.
,
1992
, “
Effects of Material Choices on Brush Seal Performance
,”
Lubr. Eng.
,
48
(9), pp.
740
746
.
8.
Owen
,
A. K.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
,
Guo
,
S. M.
, and
Hogg
,
S.
,
2003
, “
An Experimental and Theoretical Study of Brush Seal and Shaft Thermal Interaction
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38276.
9.
Ruggiero
,
E.
,
Allen
,
J.
,
Demiroglu
,
M.
, and
Lusted
,
R. M.
,
2007
, “
Heat Generation Characteristics of a Kevlar Fiber Brush Seal
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2007-5738.
10.
Ruggiero
,
E.
,
Allen
,
J.
, and
Lusted
,
R.
,
2008
, “
Heat Generation Characteristics of a Carbon Fiber Brush Seal
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2008-4508.
11.
Raben
,
M.
,
Friedrichs
,
J.
, and
Flegler
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Brush Seal Frictional Heat Generation: Test Rig Design and Validation Under Steam Environment
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56951.
12.
Dogu
,
Y.
, and
Aksit
,
M. F.
,
2006
, “
Brush Seal Temperature Distribution Analysis
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
(
3
), pp.
599
609
.
13.
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Guardino
,
C.
,
2004
, “
Simulation of Flow and Heat Transfer in the Tip Region of a Brush Seal
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
25
(
4
), pp.
649
658
.
14.
Qiu
,
B.
, and
Li
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Numerical Investigations on the Heat Transfer Behavior of Brush Seals Using Combined Computational Fluid Dynamics and Finite Element Method
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
135
(
12
), p.
122601
.
15.
Qiu
,
B.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Feng
,
Z.
,
2015
, “
Investigation of Conjugate Heat Transfer in Brush Seals Using Porous Media Approach Under Local Thermal Non-Equilibrium Conditions
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42550.
16.
Demiroglu
,
M.
,
Gursoy
,
M.
, and
Tichy
,
J. A.
,
2007
, “
An Investigation of Tip Force Characteristics of Brush Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-28042.
17.
Schwarz
,
H.
,
Kosyna
,
G.
, and
Flegler
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Experimentelle Untersuchungen Zur radialen Adaptivität von Bürstendichtungen für Dampfturbinen
,” VGB Conference on Steam Turbines and Operation of Steam Turbines, Lübeck, Germany, June 30–July 1.
18.
Flouros
,
M.
,
Stadlbauer
,
M.
,
Cottier
,
F.
,
Proestler
,
S.
, and
Beichl
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Transient Temperature Measurements in the Contact Zone Between Brush Seals of Kevlar and Metallic Type for Bearing Chamber Sealing Using a Pyrometric Technique
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-68354.
19.
Flouros
,
M.
,
Hendrick
,
P.
,
Outirba
,
B.
,
Cottier
,
F.
, and
Proestler
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Thermal and Flow Phenomena Associated With the Behavior of Brush Seals in Aero Engine Bearing Chambers
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
9
), p.
092503
.
20.
Berard
,
G.
, and
Short
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Influence of Design Features on Brush Seal Performance
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 99-2685.
21.
Pekris
,
M. J.
,
Franceschini
,
G.
, and
Gillespie
,
D. R. H.
,
2011
, “
Effect of Geometric Changes in an Idealised Contacting Brush Seal Bristle Pack on Typical Key Performance Measures
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-46492.
22.
Dogu
,
Y.
,
Bahar
,
A. S.
,
Sertçakan
,
M. C.
,
Piskin
,
A.
,
Arican
,
E.
, and
Kocagül
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation of Brush Seal Leakage Performance Depending on Geometric Dimensions and Operating Conditions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
3
), p.
32506
.
23.
Bleier
,
F.
,
Pfefferle
,
D.
,
Pychynski
,
T.
, and
Bauer
,
H.-J.
,
2013
, “
Entwicklung eines instrumentierten Prüfstandsrotors zur Messung von Wärmeeinträgen
,” 62nd Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, Stuttgart, Germany, Paper No. DLRK2013-301479.
24.
Cardone
,
G.
,
Astarita
,
T.
, and
Carlomagno
,
G.
,
1997
, “
Heat Transfer Measurements on a Rotating Disk
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
1
9
.
25.
Yildiz
,
A.
,
1965
,
Zum Wärmeübergang am Kommutator: Eine Experimentelle Untersuchung
,
Technische Universität Berlin
,
Berlin, Germany
.
26.
Guardino
,
C.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
2004
, “
Numerical Simulation of 3D Bristle Bending in Brush Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-53176.
You do not currently have access to this content.