An engine health management (EHM) system typically consists of automated logic for data acquisition, parameter calculation, anomaly detection and eventually, fault identification (or isolation). Accurate fault isolation is pivotal to timely and cost-effective maintenance but is often challenging due to limited fault symptom observability and the intricacy of reasoning with heterogeneous parameters. Traditional fault isolation methods often utilize a single fault isolator (SFI) that primarily relies on gas path performance parameters. While effective for many performance-related faults, such approaches often suffer from ambiguity when two or more faults have signatures that are very similar when monitored by a rather limited number of gas path sensors. In these cases, the ambiguity often has to be resolved by experienced analysts using additional information that takes many different forms, such as various nongas path symptoms, full authority digital engine control fault codes, comparisons with the companion engine, maintenance records, and quite often, the analyst's gas turbine domain knowledge. This paper introduces an intelligent reasoner that combines the strength of an optimal, physics-based SFI and a fuzzy expert system that mimics the analytical process of human experts for ambiguity resolution. A prototype diagnostic reasoner software has been developed and evaluated using existing flight data. Significant performance improvements were observed as compared with traditional SFI results. As a generic reasoning framework, this approach can be applied not only to traditional snapshot data, but to full flight data analytics as well.

References

References
1.
Berger
,
J. M.
,
2017
,
MRO Market Update & Industry Trends
,
Aviation Week MRO Latin America
,
Cancun, Mexico
.
2.
Volponi
,
A. J.
,
2014
, “
Gas Turbine Engine Health Management: Past, Present, and Future Trends
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
5
), p.
051201
.
3.
Merrington
,
G.
,
Kwon
,
O.-K
,
Goodwin
,
G.
, and
Carlsson
,
B.
,
1991
, “
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
113
(
2
), pp.
276
282
.
4.
Litt
,
J. S.
,
Simon
,
D. L.
,
Garg
,
S.
,
Guo
,
T.-H.
,
Mercer
,
C.
,
Millar
,
R.
,
Behbahani
,
A.
,
Bajwa
,
A.
, and
Jensen
,
D. T.
,
2005
, “
A Survey of Intelligent Control and Health Management Technologies for Aircraft Propulsion Systems
,”
National Technical Information Service
,
Springfield, VA
, Report No.
NASA/TM–2005-213622
.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.99.5111&rep=rep1&type=pdf
5.
Li
,
Y. G.
,
2002
, “
Performance-Analysis-Based Gas Turbine Diagnostics: A Review
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
216
(
5
), pp.
363
377
.
6.
DePold
,
H.
, and
Gass
,
F. D.
,
1999
, “
The Application of Expert Systems and Neural Networks to Gas Turbine Prognostics and Diagnostics
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
(
4
), pp.
607
612
.
7.
Lu
,
P. J.
,
Hsu
,
T. C.
,
Zhang
,
M. C.
, and
Zhang
,
J.
,
2001
, “
An Evaluation of Engine Fault Diagnostics Using Artificial Neural Networks
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
123
(
2
), pp.
240
246
.
8.
Military Standard
,
1992
, “
Definitions of Terms for Testing, Measurement, and Diagnostics
,” Naval Electronic Systems Command, Washington, DC, Standard No. MIL-STD-1309D.
9.
Ganguli
,
R.
,
2002
, “
Fuzzy Logic Intelligent System for Gas Turbine Module and System Fault Isolation
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
18
(
2
), pp.
440
447
.
10.
Dempsey
,
J. P.
, and
Afjeh
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Integrating Oil Debris and Vibration Gear Damage Detection Technologies Using Fuzzy Logic
,”
National Technical Information Service
,
Springfield, VA
, Report No.
TM-2002-211126
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20020070653.pdf
11.
Andreas
,
K.
, and
Mathioudakis
,
K.
,
2009
, “
Gas Turbine Fault Diagnosis Using Fuzzy-Based Decision Fusion
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
25
(
2
), pp.
335
343
.
12.
Doel
,
D. L.
,
1990
, “
The Role for Expert Systems in Commercial Gas Turbine Engine Monitoring
,”
ASME
Paper No. 90-GT-374.
13.
DePold
,
H. R.
, and
Gass
,
F. D.
,
1998
, “
The Application of Expert Systems and Neural Networks to Gas Turbine Prognostics and Diagnostics
,”
ASME
Paper No
. 98-GT-101.https://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/data/Conferences/ASMEP/82042/V005T15A009-98-GT-101.pdf
14.
Romessis
,
C.
,
Kyriazis
,
A.
, and
Mathioudakis
,
K.
,
2007
, “
Fusion of Gas Turbines Diagnostic Inference: The Dempster-Schafer Approach
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27043.
15.
Orsagh
,
R. F.
,
Sheldon
,
J.
, and
Klenke
,
C. J.
,
2003
, “
Prognostics/Diagnostics for Gas Turbine Engine Bearings
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38075.
16.
Roemer
,
M. J.
,
Kacprzynski
,
G. J.
, and
Orsagh
,
R. F.
,
2001
, “
Assessment of Data and Knowledge Fusion Strategies for Prognostics and Health Management
,”
IEEE
Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar. 10–17, pp.
2979
2988
.
17.
Volponi
,
A. J.
,
Brotherton
,
T.
,
Luppold
,
R.
, and
Simon
,
D. L.
,
2003
, “
Development of an Information Fusion System for Engine Diagnostics and Health Management
,” NASA National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, Report No.
TM-2004-212924
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040040086.pdf
18.
Volponi
,
A. J.
,
2005
, “
Data Fusion for Enhanced Aircraft Engine Prognostics and Health Management
,” NASA,
Glenn Research Center, National Technical Information Service
,
Springfield, VA
, Report No.
CR-2005-214055
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060004792.pdf
19.
Volponi
,
A. J.
,
DePold
,
H.
,
Ganguli
,
R.
, and
Daguang
,
C.
,
2003
, “
The Use of Kalman Filter and Neural Network Methodologies in Gas Turbine Performance Diagnostics: A Comparative Study
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
125
(
4
), pp.
917
924
.
20.
Volponi
,
A. J.
,
2003
,
Extending Gas Path Analysis Coverage for Other Fault Conditions
(Von Karman Lecture Notes),
von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics
,
Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium
.
21.
Volponi
,
A. J.
, and
Tang
,
L.
,
2016
, “
Improved Engine Health Monitoring Using Full Flight Data and Companion Engine Information
,”
SAE Int. J. Aerosp.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
91
102
.
22.
Volponi
,
A. J.
, and
Butler
,
S. W.
,
2012
, “
Engine Monitor for a Multi-Engine System
,” U.S. Patent No. 20140222310 A1.
23.
Dubois
,
D.
, and
Prade
,
H.
,
1992
,
On the Combination of Evidence in Various Mathematical Frameworks
(Reliability Data Collection and Analysis),
J.
Flamm
and
T.
Luisi
, eds.,
ECSC, EEC, EAFC
,
Brussels, Belgium
, pp.
213
241
.
You do not currently have access to this content.