Full-thermal heat-soak of machinery is vital for acquiring accurate aerodynamic performance data, but this process often requires significant testing time to allow all facility components to reach a steady-state temperature. Even still, there is the potential for heat loss in a well-insulated facility, and this can lead to inaccurate results. The implementation of a torquemeter to calculate performance metrics, such as isentropic efficiency, has two potential advantages: (1) the method is not susceptible to effects due to thermal heat loss in the facility, and (2) a torquemeter directly measures actual torque, and thus work, input, which eliminates the need to fully heat-soak to measure the actual enthalpy rise of the gas. This paper presents a comparison of aerodynamic performance metrics calculated both from data acquired with thermal measurements as well as from a torquemeter.

These tests were conducted over five speedlines for a shrouded impeller in the Southwest Research Institute Single Stage Test Rig facility. Isentropic efficiency calculated from the torquemeter was approximately 1–2 efficiency points lower than the isentropic efficiency based on thermal measurements. This corresponds to approximately 0.5–1 °C in heat loss in the discharge collector and piping. Furthermore, observations from three full-thermal heat-soak points indicate the significant difference in time required to reach steady-state performance within measurement uncertainty tolerances between the torque-based and thermal-based methods. This comparison, while largely suspected, has not yet been studied in previous publications.

References

References
1.
Kline
,
S. J.
, and
McClintock
,
F. A.
,
1953
, “
Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments
,”
Mech. Eng.
,
75
(1), pp.
3
8
.
2.
Brun, K. K.
, and
Kurz, R. R.
, 2000, “
Measurement Uncertainties Encountered During Gas Turbine Driven Compressor Field Testing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
123
(1), pp. 62–69.
3.
ASME
,
1998
, “
Performance Test Code on Test Uncertainty
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. ASME PTC 19.1.
4.
AIAA
,
2003
, “
Assessing Experimental Uncertainty—Supplement to AIAA S-071A-199
,” American Institute of Aeronautics Astronautics, Reston, VA, Standard No. AIAA G-045-2003.
5.
Lou
,
F.
,
Fabian
,
J.
, and
Key
,
N. L.
,
2014
, “
The Effect of Gas Models on Compressor Efficiency Including Uncertainty
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
1
), p.
012601
.
6.
Casey
,
M. V.
, and
Fesich
,
T. M.
,
2009
, “
On the Efficiency of Compressors With Diabatic Flows
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59015.
7.
Luddecke
,
B.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
,
Ehrard
,
J.
,
Steinacher
,
B.
,
Seene
,
C.
, and
Bargende
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Contactless Shaft Torque Detection for Wide Range Performance Measurement of Exhaust Gas Turbocharger Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
6
), p.
061022
.
8.
ASME
,
1997
, “
Performance Test Code on Compressors and Exhausters
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. ASME PTC 10-1997.
9.
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
1985
, “
Loss Reduction in Axial-Flow Compressors Through Low-Speed Model Testing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
(2), pp.
351
363
.
10.
Wood
,
J. R.
,
Adam
,
P. W.
, and
Buggele
,
A. E.
,
1983
, “
NASA Low-Speed Centrifugal Compressor for Fundamental Research
,” NASA Technical Memorandum, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, OH, Report No. 83398.
11.
Allison
,
T.
,
Moore
,
J.
,
Rimpel
,
A.
,
Wilkes
,
J.
,
Pelton
,
R.
, and
Wygant
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Manufacturing and Testing Experience With Direct Metal Laser Sintering for Closed Centrifugal Compressor Impellers
,”
43rd Turbomachinery and 30th Pump Users Symposia
, Houston, TX, Sept. 23–25, p. 12.http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/162728/TurboLecture6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
12.
Pelton
,
R.
,
Allison
,
T.
,
Jung
,
S.
, and
Smith
,
N.
,
2017
, “
Design of a Wide-Range Centrifugal Compressor Stage for Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-65172.
13.
Lemmon
,
E. W.
,
Huber
,
M. L.
, and
McLinden
,
M. O.
,
2013
, “
NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties—REFPROP
,” Version 9.1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference Data Program, Gaithersburg, MD.
14.
Gernert
,
G. J.
,
2013
, “
A New Helmholtz Energy Model for Humid Gases and CCS Mixtures
,” Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr-Universit€at Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
15.
ASME
,
2011
, “
Measurement of Gas Flow by Bellmouth Inlet Flowmeters
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No.
MFC-26-2011
.https://www.asme.org/products/codes-standards/mfc-26---2011-measurement-of-gas-flow-by-bellmouth
16.
Berdanier
,
R. A.
,
Smith
,
N. R.
,
Fabian
,
J. C.
, and
Key
,
N. L.
,
2015
, “
Humidity Effects on Experimental Compressor Performance—Corrected Conditions for Real Gases
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
3
), p.
031011
.
You do not currently have access to this content.