In high and intermediate pressure (HIP) steam turbines with shrouded blades, it is well known that shroud leakage losses contribute significantly to overall losses. Shroud leakage flow with a large tangential velocity creates a significant aerodynamic loss due to mixing with the mainstream flow. In order to reduce this mixing loss, two distinct ideas for rotor shroud exit cavity geometries were investigated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses and experimental tests. One idea was an axial fin placed from the shroud downstream casing to reduce the axial cavity gap, and the other was a swirl breaker placed in the rotor shroud exit cavity to reduce the tangential velocity of the leakage flow. In addition to the conventional cavity geometry, three types of shroud exit cavity geometries were designed, manufactured, and tested using a 1.5-stage air model turbine with medium aspect ratio blading. Test results showed that the axial fin and the swirl breaker raised turbine stage efficiency by 0.2% and 0.7%, respectively. The proposed swirl breaker was judged to be an effective way to achieve highly efficient steam turbines because it not only reduces the mixing losses but also improves the incidence angle distribution onto the downstream blade row. This study is presented in two papers. The basic design concept and typical performance of the proposed swirl breaker are presented in this part I, and the effect of axial distance between a swirl breaker and rotor shroud on efficiency improvement is discussed in part II [8].

References

References
1.
Tanuma
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Chapter I: Introduction to Steam Turbines for Power Plants
,”
Advances in Steam Turbines for Modern Power Plants
,
Elsevier
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp.
3
9
.
2.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1993
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
(
4
), pp.
621
656
.
3.
Wallis
,
A. M.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Demargne
,
A. J.
,
2001
, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
2
), pp.
334
341
.
4.
Rosic
,
B.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
,
2006
, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Loss by Reducing Circumferential Mixing
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90946.
5.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
2004
, “
Making Use of Labyrinth Interaction Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-53797.
6.
Rosic
,
B.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
,
Curtis
,
E. M.
, and
Perterson
,
A. T.
,
2007
, “
The Influence of Shroud and Cavity Geometry on Turbine Performance—An Experimental and Computational Study—Part 2: Exit Cavity Geometry
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27770.
7.
Barmpalias
,
K. G.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Hirano
,
T.
,
Shibukawa
,
N.
, and
Sasaki
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Design Considerations for Axial Steam Turbine Rotor Inlet Cavity Volume and Length Scale
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-45127.
8.
Duan
,
C.
,
Fukushima
,
H.
,
Segawa
,
K.
,
Shibata
,
T.
, and
Fujii
,
H.
,
2018
, “
Improvement of Steam Turbine Stage Efficiency by Controlling Rotor Shroud Leakage Flows—Part II: Effect of Axial Distance Between a Swirl Breaker and a Rotor Shroud on Efficiency Improvement
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
(accepted).
9.
Segawa
,
K.
,
Shikano
,
Y.
,
Tsubouchi
,
K.
, and
Shibashita
,
N.
,
2002
, “
Development of a Highly Loaded Rotor Blade for Steam Turbines
,”
JSME Int. J. Ser. B Fluids Therm. Eng.
,
45
(
4
), pp.
881
890
.
You do not currently have access to this content.