Ceramic matrix composite (CMC) have higher temperature durability and lower density property compared to nickel-based super-alloys which so far have been widely applied to hot section components of aero-engines/gas turbines. One of promising CMC systems, SiC–SiC CMC is able to sustain its mechanical property at higher temperature, though it inherently needs environmental barrier coating (EBC) to avoid oxidation. There are several requirements for EBC. One of such critical requirements is its resistance to particle erosion, whereas this subject has not been well investigated in the past. The present work presents the results of a combined experimental and numerical research to evaluate the erosion characteristics of CMC + EBC material developed by IHI. First, experiments were carried out in an erosion test facility using 50 μm diameter silica as erosion media under typical engine conditions with velocity of 225 m/s, temperature of 1311 K, and impingement angles of 30, 60, and 80 deg. The data displayed brittle erosion mode in that the erosion rate increased with impact angles. Also, it was verified that a typical erosion model, Neilson–Gilchrist model, can reproduce the experimental behavior fairly well if its model constants were properly determined. The numerical method solving particle-laden flow was then applied with the tuned erosion model to compute three dimensional flow field, particle trajectories, and erosion profile around a generic turbine airfoil to assess the erosion characteristics of the proposed CMC + EBC material when applied to airfoil. The trajectories indicated that the particles primarily impacted the airfoil leading edge and the pressure surface. Surface erosion patterns were predicted based on the calculated trajectories and the experimentally based erosion characteristics.

References

References
1.
Alvin
,
M. A.
,
Anderson
,
I.
,
Heidloff
,
A.
,
White
,
E.
,
Bhatt
,
R.
,
Grady
,
J.
,
McMordie
,
B.
, and
Warnes
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Development of Advanced Material Systems for Future Gas Turbine Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-43456.
2.
Watanabe
,
F.
,
Nakamura
,
T.
, and
Shinohara
,
K.
,
2016
, “
The Application of Ceramic Matrix Composite to Low Pressure Turbine Blade
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56614.
3.
Watanabe
,
F.
,
Nakamura
,
T.
, and
Mizokami
,
Y.
,
2017
, “
Design and Testing for Ceramic Matrix Composite Turbine Vane
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63264.
4.
Wensky
,
T.
,
Winkler
,
L.
, and
Friedrichs
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Environmental Influences on Engine Performance Degradation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22748.
5.
Hamed
,
A.
,
Tabakoff
,
W.
,
Rivir
,
R. B.
,
Das
,
K.
, and
Arora
,
P.
,
2005
, “
Turbine Blade Surface Deterioration by Erosion
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
127
, pp.
445
452
.
6.
Hamed
,
A.
,
Tabakoff
,
W.
,
Swar
,
R.
,
Shin
,
D.
,
Woggon
,
N.
, and
Miller
,
R.
,
2013
, “
Combined Experimental and Numerical Simulations of Thermal Barrier Coated Turbine Blades Erosion
,” NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. NASA/TM-2013-217857.
7.
Ghenaiet
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Effects of Solid Particle Ingestion Through and HP Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-69875.
8.
Nagy
,
D.
, and
Bergstaller
,
G.
,
2005
, “
LPM Composite Overlay for Erosion Protection of Turbine Nozzles
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-69019.
9.
Erazo
,
F.
,
Robertson
,
T.
,
Huang
,
X.
,
Kearsey
,
R.
, and
Yang
,
Q.
,
2017
, “
Erosion Properties of Ceramic Composite Material Based on Nano-Mullite Whisker and Zirconia-Toughened Alumina
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63736.
10.
Meier
,
S. M.
, and
Gupta
,
D. K.
,
1994
, “
The Evolution of Thermal Barrier Coatings in Gas Turbines Engine Applications
,”
ASEM J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
116
, pp.
250
257
.
11.
Tabakoff
,
W.
, and
Wakeman
,
T.
,
1979
, “
Test Facility for Material Erosion at High Temperature
,” American Society for Testing and Materials, Special Publication 664, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
123
135.
12.
Leithead
,
S. G.
,
Allan
,
W. D. D.
,
Zhao
,
L.
, and
Yang
,
Q.
,
2016
, “
Enhanced Experimental Testing of New Erosion-Resistant Compressor Blade Coatings
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
11
), p.
112603
.
13.
Miller
,
R. A.
,
Kuczmarski
,
M. A.
, and
Zhu
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Burner Rig With an Unattached Duct for Evaluating the Erosion Resistance of Thermal Barrier Coatings
,” NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. NASA/TM-2011-217008.
14.
Kirschner
,
M.
,
Wobst
,
T.
,
Rittmeister
,
B.
, and
Mundt
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Erosion Testing of Thermal Barrier Coatings in a High Enthalpy Wind Tunnel
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
3
), p.
032101
.
15.
Shin
,
D.
, and
Hamed
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Advanced High Temperature Erosion Tunnel for Testing TBC and New Turbine Blade Materials
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57922.
16.
United States Department of Defense, “
Engine, Aircraft, Turbojet and Turbofan, General Specification
,” United States Department of Defense, Arlington, VA, Report No.
MIL-E-5007D.
17.
United States Department of Defense, “
Department of Defense Joint Service Specification Guide: Engines, Aircraft, Turbine
,” United States Department of Defense, Arlington, VA, Report No.
JSSG-2007A.
18.
Nicholls
,
J. R.
,
1997
, “
Laboratory Studies of Erosion-Corrosion Processes Under Oxidising and Oxidising/Sulphidising Conditions
,”
Mater. High Temp.
,
14
(3), pp.
219
236
.
19.
Oka
,
Y. I.
,
Nishimura
,
M.
,
Nagahashi
,
K.
, and
Matsumura
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Control and Evaluation of Particle Impact Conditions in a Sand Erosion Test Facility
,”
Wear
,
250
(
1–12
), pp.
736
743
.
20.
Xiao
,
Y. Q.
,
Yang
,
L.
,
Zhou
,
Y. C.
,
Wei
,
Y. G.
, and
Wang
,
N. G.
,
2017
, “
Dominant Parameters Affecting the Reliability of TBCs on a Gas Turbine Blade During Erosion by a Particle-Laden Hot Gas Stream
,”
Wear
,
390–391
, pp.
166
175
.
21.
Siemens PLM Software
,
2017
, “
STAR-CCM+ Software User Guide Version 12.04.011
,” Siemens PLM Software, Plano, TX.
22.
Sommerfeld
,
M.
,
2000
,
Theoretical and Experimental Modeling of Particulate Flows—Overview and Fundamentals
(VKI Lecture Series 2000-06),
VKI
, Sint-Genesius-Rode,
Belgium
.
23.
Schiller
,
L.
, and
Naumann
,
A.
,
1933
, “
Ueber Die Grundlegenden Berechnungen Bei Der Schwerkraft-Aufbereitung
,”
VDI Zeits.
,
77
, pp.
318
320
.
24.
Ranz
,
W. E.
, and
Marshall
,
W. R.
,
1952
, “
Evaporation From Drops—Part I
,”
Chem. Eng. Prog.
,
48
(
3
), pp.
141
146
.
25.
Ranz
,
W. E.
, and
Marshall
,
W. R.
,
1952
, “
Evaporation From Drops—Part II
,”
Chem. Eng. Prog.
,
48
(
3
), pp.
173
180
.
26.
Finnie
,
I.
,
1960
, “
Erosion of Surfaces by Solid Particles
,”
Wear
,
3
(
2
), pp.
87
103
.
27.
Bitter
,
J. G. A.
,
1963
, “
A Study of Erosion Phenomena—Part II
,”
Wear
,
6
(
3
), pp.
169
190
.
28.
Neilson
,
J. H.
, and
Gilchrist
,
A.
,
1968
, “
Erosion by a Stream of Solid Particles
,”
Wear
,
11
(
2
), pp.
111
122
.
29.
Li
,
D. Y.
,
Elalem
,
K.
,
Anderson
,
M. J.
, and
Chiovelli
,
S.
,
1999
, “
A Microscale Dynamical Model for Wear Simulation
,”
Wear
,
225–229
, pp.
380
386
.
30.
Hoheisel
,
H.
,
1990
, “
Test Cases for Computation of Internal Flows in Aero Engine Components
,” AGARD, Neuilly sur Seine, France, pp.
112
123
, Report No. AGARD-AR-275.
31.
Nicholls
,
J. R.
,
Deakin
,
M. J.
, and
Rickerby
,
D. S.
,
1999
, “
A Comparison Between the Erosion Behavior of Thermal Spray and Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition Thermal Barrier Coatings
,”
Wear
,
233–235
, pp.
352
361
.
You do not currently have access to this content.