Squeeze film dampers (SFDs) in aircraft engines effectively aid to reduce rotor motion amplitudes, in particular when traversing a critical speed, and help to alleviate rotor whirl instabilities. The current work is a long-term endeavor focused on quantifying the dynamic force performance of practical SFDs, exploring novel design damper configurations, and producing physically sound predictive SFD models validated by experimental data. Piston rings (PRs) and O-rings (ORs), commonly used as end seals in SFDs for commercial and military gas turbine engines, respectively, amplify viscous damping in a short physical length and while operating with a modicum of lubricant flow. This paper presents experimental force coefficients (damping and inertia) for two identical geometry SFDs with end seals, one configuration hosts PRs, and the other one ORs. The test rig comprises a stationary journal and bearing cartridge (BC) hosting the SFD and supported on four elastic rods to emulate a squirrel cage. The damper film land length, diameter, and clearance are L = 25.4 mm, D = 5L, and c = 0.373 mm (D/c = 340), respectively. A supply feeds ISO VG 2 oil to the film land at its middle plane through either one hole or three holes, 2.5 mm in diameter, 120 deg apart. In the PRSFD, the lubricant exits through the slit opening at the ring butted ends. The ORs suppress oil leakage; hence, lubricant evacuates through a 1 mm hole at ¼ L near one journal end. The ORs when installed add significant stiffness and damping to the test structure. The ORSFD produces 20% more damping than the PRSFD, whereas both sealed ends SFDs show similar size added mass. For oil supplied at 0.69 bar(g) through a single orifice produces larger damping, 60–80% more than when the damper operates with three oil feedholes. A computational model reproducing the test conditions delivers force coefficients in agreement with the test data. Archival literature calls for measurement of a single pressure signal to estimate SFD reaction forces. For circular centered orbits (CCOs), the dynamic pressure field, in the absence of any geometrical asymmetry or feed/discharge oil condition, “rotates” around the bearing with a speed equal to the whirl frequency. The paper presents force coefficients estimated from (a) measurements of the applied forces and ensuing displacements, and (b) the dynamic pressure recorded at a fixed angular location and “integrated” over the journal surface. The first method delivers a damping coefficient that is large even with lubricant supplied at a low oil supply pressure whereas the inertia coefficient increases steadily with feed pressure. Predictions show good agreement with the test results from measured forces and displacements, in particular the added mass. On the other hand, identified damping and inertia coefficients from dynamic pressures show a marked difference from one pressure sensor to another, and vastly disagreeing with test results from the first method or predictions. The rationale for the discrepancy relies on local distortions in the dynamic pressure fields that show zones of oil vapor cavitation at a near zero absolute pressure and/or with air ingestion producing high frequency spikes from bubble collapsing; both phenomena depend on the magnitude of the oil supply pressure. An increase in lubricant supply pressure suppresses both oil vapor cavitation and air ingestion, which produces an increase of both damping and inertia force coefficients. No prior art compares the performance of a PRSFD vis-à-vis that of an ORSFD. Supplying lubricant with a large enough pressure (flow rate) is crucial to avoid the pervasiveness of air ingestion. Last, the discussion on force coefficients obtained from two distinct methods questions the use of an oversimplifying assumption; the dynamic pressure field is not invariant in a rotating coordinate frame.

References

References
1.
Miyachi
,
T.
,
Hoshiya
,
S.
,
Sofue
,
Y.
,
Matsuki
,
M.
, and
Torisaki
,
T.
,
1979
, “
Oil Squeeze Film Dampers for Reducing Vibration of Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME
Paper No. 79-GT-133.
2.
Zeidan
,
F.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J.
,
1996
, “
Design and Application of Squeeze Film Dampers in Rotating Machinery
,”
25th Turbomachinery Symposium
, College Station, TX, Sept. 17–19, pp.
169
188
.http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/163447
3.
Kuzdzal
,
M. J.
, and
Hustak
,
J. F.
,
1996
, “
Squeeze Film Damper Bearing Experimental Vs Analytical Results for Various Damper Configurations
,”
25th Turbomachinery Symposium
, College Station, TX, Sept. 17–19, pp.
57
70
.http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/163442
4.
Della Pietra
,
L.
, and
Adiletta
,
G.
,
2002
, “
The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations—Part I: Characteristics and Operating Features
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
,
34
(
1
), pp.
3
26
.
5.
Adiletta
,
G.
, and
Della Pietra
,
L.
,
2002
, “
The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations—Part II: Rotordynamics Analysis With Rigid and Flexible Rotors
,”
Shock Vib. Dig
,
34
(
2
), pp.
97
126
.
6.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Jeung
,
S.-H.
,
Sean
,
D.
, and
Savela
,
G.
,
2016
, “
Squeeze Film Dampers: An Experimental Appraisal of their Dynamic Performance
,”
First Asia Turbomachinery and Pump Symposium
, Singapore, Feb. 22–25.https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e876/ff1f251f8e6afe3971d21279370a49173d5d.pdf
7.
Leader
,
M. E.
,
Whalen
,
J. K.
, and
Grey
,
G. G.
,
1995
, “
The Design and Application of a Squeeze Film Damper Bearing to a Flexible Steam Turbine Rotor
,”
24th Turbomachinery Symposium
, College Station, TX, pp.
49
58
.https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/163466/T2449-58.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
8.
Bansal
,
P. N.
, and
Hibner
,
D. H.
,
1978
, “
Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Squeeze Film Bearing Damper Forces Induced by Offset Circular Whirl Orbits
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
100
(
3
), pp.
549
557
.
9.
Marmol
,
R. A.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1978
, “
Squeeze Film Damper Characteristics for Gas Turbine Engine
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
100
(
1
), pp.
139
146
.https://mechanicaldesign.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleID=1450911
10.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
1985
, “
Effects of Fluid Inertia Effect on Squeeze Film Damper Force Response
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
11.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J.
,
1987
, “
Experimental Measurement of the Dynamic Pressure Distribution in a Squeeze-Film Bearing Damper Executing Circular Centered Orbits
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
373
383
.
12.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J.
,
1987
, “
Effect of Fluid Inertia on Finite Length Sealed Squeeze Film Dampers
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
30
(
3
), pp.
384
393
.
13.
Zeidan
,
F. Y.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1989
, “
Cavitation Leading to a Two Phase Fluid in a Squeeze Film Damper
,”
Trib. Tram.
,
32
(
1
), pp.
100
104
.
14.
Meng
,
G.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J.
,
1991
, “
Experimental Measurement of the Dynamic Pressure and Force Response of a Partially Sealed Squeeze Film Damper
,”
13th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise
, Miami, FL, Sept., 22–25.
15.
Jung
,
S. Y.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1991
, “
Measurements of Pressure Distribution and Force Coefficients in a Squeeze Film Damper—Part I: Fully Open Ended Configuration
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
34
(
3
), pp.
375
382
.
16.
Jung
,
S. Y.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1993
, “
Effects of Vapor Cavitation and Fluid Inertia on the Force Coefficients of a Squeeze Film Damper—Part II: Experimental Comparisons
,”
Trib. Trans.
,
36
(
4
), pp.
700
706
.
17.
Defaye
,
C.
,
Arghir
,
M.
, and
Bonneau
,
O.
,
2006
, “
Experimental Study of the Radial and Tangential Forces in a Whirling Squeeze Film Dampers
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
49
(
2
), pp.
271
278
.
18.
Jäger
,
S.
,
Bruchmüller
,
T.
, and
Albers
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Dynamic Behaviour and Sealing Performance of Piston Rings Used in Squeeze-Film-Dampers
,”
Sealing Technol.
,
2012
(
11
), pp.
9
13
.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350478912704853
19.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Seshagiri
,
S.
,
2013
, “
Damping and Inertia Coefficients for Two End Sealed Squeeze Film Dampers With a Central Groove: Measurements and Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
135
(
11
), p.
112503
.
20.
Jeung
,
S.-H.
,
2017
, “
Experimental Performance of an Open Ends Squeeze Film Damper and a Sealed Ends Squeeze Film Damper
,”
Ph.D. dissertation
, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/161364/JEUNG-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
21.
Delgado
,
A.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2010
, “
A Model for Improved Prediction of Force Coefficients in Grooved Squeeze Film Dampers and Oil Seal Rings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
132
(
3
), p.
032202
.
22.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2012
, “
Extended Finite Element Analysis of Journal Bearing Forced Performance to Include Fluid Inertia Force Coefficients
,”
ASME
Paper No. IMECE2012-87713.
23.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Jeung
,
S.-H.
,
2016
, “
Orbit-Model Force Coefficients for Fluid Film Bearings: A Step Beyond Linearization
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
2
), p.
022502
.
24.
Fritzen
,
C. P.
,
1985
, “
Identification of Mass, Damping, and Stiffness Matrices of Mechanical System
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
108
(
1
), pp.
9
16
.
You do not currently have access to this content.