With the current shift from centralized to more decentralized power production, new opportunities arise for small-scale combined heat and power (CHP) production units like micro gas turbines (mGTs). However, to fully embrace these opportunities, the current mGT technology has to become more flexible in terms of operation—decoupling the heat and power production in CHP mode—and in terms of fuel utilization—showing flexibility in the operation with different lower heating value (LHV) fuels. Cycle humidification, e.g., by performing steam injection, is a possible route to handle these problems. Current simulation models are able to correctly assess the impact of humidification on the cycle performance, but they fail to provide detailed information on the combustion process. To fully quantify the potential of cycle humidification, more advanced numerical models—preferably validated—are necessary. These models are not only capable of correctly predicting the cycle performance, but they can also handle the complex chemical kinetics in the combustion chamber. In this paper, we compared and validated such a model with a typical steady-state model of the steam injected mGT cycle based on the Turbec T100. The advanced one is an in-house MATLAB model, based on the NIST database for the characterization of the properties of the gaseous compounds with the combustion mechanisms embedded according to the Gri-MEch 3.0 library. The validation one was constructed using commercial software (Aspen Plus), using the more advance Redlich-Kwong-Soave (RKS)- Boston-Mathias(BM) property method and assuming complete combustion by using a Gibbs reactor. Both models were compared considering steam injection in the compressor outlet or in the combustion chamber, focusing only on the global cycle performance. Simulation results of the steam injection cycle fueled with natural gas and syngas showed some differences between the two presented models (e.g., 5.9% on average for the efficiency increase over the simulated steam injection rates at nominal power output for injection in the compressor outlet); however, the general trends that could be observed are consistent. Additionally, the numerical results of the injection in the compressor outlet were also validated with steam-injection experiments in a Turbec T100, indicating that the advanced MATLAB model overestimates the efficiency improvement by 25–45%. The results show the potential of simulating the humidified cycle using more advanced models; however, in future work, special attention should be paid to the experimental tuning of the model parameters in general and the recuperator performance in particular to allow correct assessment of the cycle performance.

References

References
1.
IEA
,
2014
, “
Energy, Climate Changed & Environment: 2014 Insights
,” International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
2.
EEA
,
2013
, “
Combined Heat and Power (CHP) (ENER 020)—Assessment
,” European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, accessed Aug. 19, 2014, http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/combined-heat-and-power-chp-1/combined-heat-and-power-chp-2
3.
Delattin
,
F.
,
Bram
,
S.
,
Knoops
,
S.
, and
De Ruyck
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Effects of Steam Injection on Microturbine Efficiency and Performance
,”
Energy
,
33
(
2
), pp.
241
247
.
4.
De Paepe
,
W.
,
Montero Carrero
,
M.
,
Bram
,
S.
,
Contino
,
F.
, and
Parente
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Waste Heat Recovery Optimization in Micro Gas Turbine Applications Using Advanced Humidified Gas Turbine Cycle Concepts
,”
Appl. Energy
,
207
, pp.
218
229
.
5.
Renzi
,
M.
,
Patuzzi
,
F.
, and
Baratieri
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Syngas Feed of Micro Gas Turbines With Steam Injection: Effects on Performance, Combustion and Pollutants Formation
,”
Appl. Energy
,
206
, pp.
697
707
.
6.
Renzi
,
M.
,
Riolfi
,
C.
, and
Baratieri
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Influence of the Syngas Feed on the Combustion Process and Performance of a Micro Gas Turbine With Steam Injection
,”
Energy Procedia
,
105
, pp.
1665
1670
.
7.
Jonsson
,
M.
, and
Yan
,
J.
,
2005
, “
Humidified Gas Turbines—A Review of Proposed and Implemented Cycles
,”
Energy
,
30
(
7
), pp.
1013
1078
.
8.
De Paepe
,
W.
,
Montero Carrero
,
M.
,
Bram
,
S.
,
Parente
,
A.
, and
Contino
,
F.
,
2017
, “
Toward Higher Micro Gas Turbine Efficiency and Flexibility—Humidified Micro Gas Turbines: A Review
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
140
(
8
), p.
081702
.
9.
Lee
,
J. J.
,
Jeon
,
M. S.
, and
Kim
,
T. S.
,
2010
, “
The Influence of Water and Steam Injection on the Performance of a Recuperated Cycle Microturbine for Combined Heat and Power Application
,”
Appl. Energy
,
87
(
4
), pp.
1307
1316
.
10.
Mochizuki
,
K.
,
Shibata
,
S.
,
Inoue
,
U.
,
Tsuchiya
,
T.
,
Sotouchi
,
H.
, and
Okamoto
,
M.
,
2005
, “
New Concept of a Micro Gas Turbine Based Co-Generation Package for Performance Improvement in Practical Use
,”
ASME
Paper No. PWR2005-50364
.
11.
Stathopoulos
,
P.
, and
Paschereit
,
C.
,
2015
, “
Retrofitting Micro Gas Turbines for Wet Operation: A Way to Increase Operational Flexibility in Distributed CHP Plants
,”
Appl. Energy
,
154
, pp.
438
446
.
12.
De Paepe
,
W.
,
Delattin
,
F.
,
Bram
,
S.
, and
De Ruyck
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Steam Injection Experiments in a Microturbine—A Thermodynamic Performance Analysis
,”
Appl. Energy
,
97
, pp.
569
576
.
13.
De Paepe
,
W.
,
Delattin
,
F.
,
Bram
,
S.
,
Contino
,
F.
, and
De Ruyck
,
J.
,
2013
, “
A Study on the Performance of Steam Injection in a Typical Micro Gas Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94569
.
14.
Ferrari
,
M. L.
,
Pascenti
,
M.
,
Traverso
,
A. N.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
,
2012
, “
Hybrid System Test Rig: Chemical Composition Emulation With Steam Injection
,”
Appl. Energy
,
97
, pp.
809
815
.
15.
Renzi
,
M.
,
Caligiuri
,
C.
, and
Rossi
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Micro-Gas Turbine Feed With Natural Gas and Synthesis Gas: Variation of the Turbomachines Operative Conditions With and Without Steam Injection
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63801
.
16.
Loujendi
,
D.
,
Sani
,
K.
,
Tofigh
,
A.
,
Majidian
,
A.
, and
Jouybari
,
H.
,
2012
, “
An Economical Evaluation of the Water/Steam Injection in a CHP Microturbine Cycle
,”
J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev.
,
5
(
2
), pp.
20
25
.
17.
Stathopoulos
,
P.
, and
Paschereit
,
C. O.
,
2015
, “
Operational Strategies of Wet Cycle Micro Gas Turbines and Their Economic Evaluation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
12
), p.
122301
.
18.
Turbec
,
A. B.
,
2000-2001
, “
T100 Microturbine CHP System: Technical Description Ver 4.0
,” Turbec AB, Malmö, Sweden.
19.
Renzi
,
M.
,
Caresana
,
F.
,
Pelagalli
,
L.
, and
Comodi
,
G.
,
2014
, “
Enhancing Micro Gas Turbine Performance Through Fogging Technique: Experimental Analysis
,”
Appl. Energy
,
135
, pp.
165
173
.
20.
Goodwin
,
D. G.
,
Moffat
,
H. K.
, and
Speth
,
R. L.
,
2017
, “
Cantera: An Object-Oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes
,” Version 2.3.0, accessed Aug. 16, 2018, http://www.cantera.org
21.
Smith
,
G. P.
,
Golden
,
D. M.
,
Frenklach
,
M.
,
Moriarty
,
N. W.
,
Eiteneer
,
B.
,
Goldenberg
,
M.
,
Bowman
,
C. T.
,
Hanson
,
R. K.
,
Song
,
S.
,
Gardiner
,
W. C., Jr.
,
Lissianski
,
V. V.
, and
Qin
,
Z.
,
2000
, “
GRI Mech
.,” accessed Aug. 16, 2018, http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/
22.
Aspen Technology Inc.
,
2017
, “
Aspen plus v9.0
,” AspenTech, Houston, TX, accessed Jan. 29, 2018, https://www.aspentech.com/en/v9
23.
De Paepe
,
W.
,
Montero Carrero
,
M.
,
Giorgetti
,
S.
,
Parente
,
A.
,
Bram
,
S.
, and
Contino
,
F.
,
2016
, “
Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Humidified Flexible Micro Gas Turbines for Carbon Capture Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57265
.
24.
De Paepe
,
W.
,
Delattin
,
F.
,
Bram
,
S.
, and
De Ruyck
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Water Injection in a Micro Gas Turbine—Assessment of the Performance Using a Black Box Method
,”
Appl. Energy
,
112
, pp.
1291
1302
.
25.
Parente
,
J.
,
Traverso
,
A.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
,
2003
, “
Micro Humid Air Cycle—Part A: Thermodynamic and Technical Aspects
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38326
.
26.
Lagerström
,
G.
, and
Xie
,
M.
,
2002
, “
High Performance and Cost Effective Recuperator for Micro-Gas Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2002-30402
.
27.
De Paepe
,
W.
,
Montero Carrero
,
M.
,
Bram
,
S.
, and
Contino
,
F.
,
2014
, “
T100 Micro Gas Turbine Converted to Full Humid Air Operation: Test Rig Evaluation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26123
.
28.
Comodi
,
G.
,
Renzi
,
M.
,
Caresana
,
F.
, and
Pelagalli
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Enhancing Micro Gas Turbine Performance in Hot Climates Through Inlet Air Cooling Vapour Compression Technique
,”
Appl. Energy
,
147
, pp.
40
48
.
You do not currently have access to this content.