Experimental research was conducted into a scooped rotor system that captures oil from a stationary jet and directs it through passages within the shaft to another axial location. Such a system has benefits for delivering oil via under-race feed to aeroengine bearings where direct access is limited. Oil capture efficiency was calculated for three jet configurations, a range of geometric variations relative to a baseline and a range of operating conditions. Flow visualization techniques yielded high-speed imaging in the vicinity of the scoop leading edge. Overall capture efficiency depends on the amount of oil initially captured by the scoop that is retained. Observation shows that when the jet hits the tip of a scoop element, it is sliced and deflected upward in a “plume.” Ligaments and drops formed from this plume are not captured. In addition, some oil initially captured is flung outward as a consequence of centrifugal force. Although in principle capture of the entire supply is possible over most of the shaft speed range, as demonstrated by a simplified geometric model, in practice 60–70% is typical. Significant improvement in capture efficiency was obtained with a lower jet angle (more radial) compared to baseline. Higher capture efficiencies were found where the ratio of jet to scoop tip speed was lower. This research confirms the capability of a scoop system to capture and retain delivered oil. Additional numerical and experimental work is recommended to further optimize the geometry and increase the investigated temperature and pressure ranges.

References

References
1.
Zaretsky
,
E. V.
,
1997
, “
Rolling Bearing and Gear Lubrication
,”
Tribology for Aerospace Applications
,
Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers
,
Park Ridge, IL
, pp.
207
323
.
2.
Brown
,
P. F.
,
1970
, “
Bearings and Dampers for Advanced Jet Engines
,”
SAE
Paper No. 700318.
3.
Lee
,
C. W.
,
Johnson
,
G. R.
,
Palma
,
P. C.
,
Simmons
,
K.
, and
Pickering
,
S. J.
,
2004
, “
Factors Affecting the Behaviour and Efficiency of a Targeted Jet Delivering Oil to a Bearing Lubrication System
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-53606.
4.
Kovaleski
,
S.
,
1987
, “
Radial Scoop Construction
,” Farmington, CT, U.S. Patent No.
4,648,485
.https://patents.google.com/patent/US4648485A/fr
5.
Fisher
,
K.
,
Demel
,
H.
, and
Hazeley
,
R.
,
2002
, “
Methods and Apparatus for Supplying Oil to Bearing Assemblies
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,409,464.
6.
Fisher
,
K.
,
2004
, “
Bi-Directional Oil Scoop for Bearing Lubrication
,” General Electric Co, Boston, MA, U.S. Patent No.
6,682,222
.https://patents.google.com/patent/US6682222
7.
Dins
,
J.
,
Hogan
,
J.
, and
Kumar
,
A.
,
2007
, “
Curved Blade Oil Scoop
,” Honeywell International Inc., Morris Plains, NJ, U.S. Patent No.
7,244,096
.https://patents.google.com/patent/US7244096
8.
Mcdonagh
,
S.
,
2016
, “
A Liquid-Capturing Shaft
,” U.S. Patent No. 2016/0069186 A1.
9.
Prasad
,
S. K.
,
Sangli
,
P.
,
Buyukisik
,
O.
, and
Pugh
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Prediction of Gas Turbine Oil Scoop Capture Efficiency
,”
ASME
Paper No. GTINDIA2014-8329.
10.
Korsukova
,
E.
,
Kruisbrink
,
A.
,
Morvan
,
H.
,
Cageao
,
P. P.
, and
Simmons
,
K.
,
2016
, “
Oil Scoop Simulation and Analysis Using CFD and SPH
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57554.
11.
Kruisbrink
,
A.
,
Korsukova
,
E.
,
Evans
,
K.
, and
Morvan
,
H. P.
,
2017
, “
SILOET 2 Project 18.4: CFD and SPH Work on the Compound Scoop
,” Gas Turbine and Transmissions Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, Internal Report No. FF142/AK/03.
You do not currently have access to this content.