In gas turbines, rim seals are fitted at the periphery of stator and rotor discs to minimize the purge flow required to seal the wheel-space between the discs. Ingestion (or ingress) of hot mainstream gases through rim seals is a threat to the operating life and integrity of highly stressed components, particularly in the first-stage turbine. Egress of sealing flow from the first-stage can be re-ingested in downstream stages. This paper presents experimental results using a 1.5-stage test facility designed to investigate ingress into the wheel-spaces upstream and downstream of a rotor disk. Re-ingestion was quantified using measurements of CO2 concentration, with seeding injected into the upstream and downstream sealing flows. Here, a theoretical mixing model has been developed from first principles and validated by the experimental measurements. For the first time, a method to quantify the mass fraction of the fluid carried over from upstream egress into downstream ingress has been presented and measured; it was shown that this fraction increased as the downstream sealing flow rate increased. The upstream purge was shown to not significantly disturb the fluid dynamics but only partially mixes with the annulus flow near the downstream seal, with the ingested fluid emanating from the boundary layer on the blade platform. From the analogy between heat and mass transfer, the measured mass-concentration flux is equivalent to an enthalpy flux, and this re-ingestion could significantly reduce the adverse effect of ingress in the downstream wheel-space. Radial traverses using a concentration probe in and around the rim seal clearances provide insight into the complex interaction between the egress, ingress and mainstream flows.

References

References
1.
Carey
,
C.
,
Inderwildi
,
O.
, and
King
,
D.
,
2009
, “
Sealing Technologies—Signed, Sealed and Delivering Emissions Savings
,”
Aviation Environ.
,
4
, pp.
44
48
.
2.
Patinios
,
M.
,
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
,
Owen
,
J. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2017
, “
Measurements and Modeling of Ingress in a New 1.5-Stage Turbine Research Facility
,”
ASME J. Gas Turbines Power
,
139
(
1
), p.
012603
.
3.
Langston
,
L. S.
,
2001
, “
Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines—A Review
,”
Ann. New York Acad. Sci.
,
934
(
1
), pp.
11
26
.
4.
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
,
Owen
,
J. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2016
, “
Review of Ingress in Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
12
), p.
120801
.
5.
Owen
,
J. M.
,
2011
, “
Prediction of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals—Part II: Externally Induced and Combined Ingress
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031006
.
6.
Sangan
,
C. M.
,
Pountney
,
O. J.
,
Zhou
,
K.
,
Wilson
,
M.
,
Owen
,
J. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2013
, “
Experimental Measurements of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals—Part 1: Externally Induced Ingress
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
2
), p.
021012
.
7.
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
1985
, “
Aerodynamic Effects of Tip Clearance, Shrouds, Leakage Flow, Casing Treatment and Trenching in Compressor Design Blading Design in the Endwall Region
,”
Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series
, Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium.
8.
Bayley
,
F. J.
, and
Childs
,
P. R. N.
,
1994
, “Air Temperature Rises in Compressor and Turbine Stator Wells,”
ASME
Paper No. 94-GT-185.
9.
Ozturk
,
H. K.
,
Childs
,
P. R. N.
,
Turner
,
A. B.
,
Hannis
,
J. M.
, and
Turner
,
J. R.
,
1998
, “A Three Dimensional Computational Study of Windage Heating Within an Axial Compressor Stator Well,”
ASME
Paper No. 98-GT-119.
10.
Specific Targeted Research Project
,
2006
, “Annex I—‘Description of Work’,” Main Annulus Gas Path Interactions (MAGPI), Proposal/Contract No. 30874.
11.
Georgakis
,
C.
,
Whitney
,
C.
,
Woolatt
,
G.
,
Stefanis
,
V.
, and
Childs
,
P.
,
2007
, “Turbine Stator Well Studies: Effect of Upstream Egress Ingestion,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27406.
12.
Eastwood
,
D.
,
Coren
,
D. D.
,
Long
,
C. A.
,
Atkins
,
N. R.
,
Childs
,
P. R. N.
,
Scanlon
,
T. J.
, and
Guijarro-Valencia
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Investigation of Turbine Stator Well Rim Seal, Re-Ingestion and Interstage Seal Flows Using Gas Concentration Techniques and Displacement Measurements
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
8
), p.
082501
.
13.
Guijarro-Valencia
,
A.
,
Dixon
,
J. A.
,
Da Soghe
,
R.
,
Facchini
,
B.
,
Smith
,
P. E. J.
,
Munoz
,
J.
,
Eastwood
,
D.
,
Long
,
C. A.
,
Coren
,
D. D.
, and
Atkins
,
N. R.
,
2012
, “An Investigation Into Numerical Analysis Alternatives for Predicting Re-ingestion in Turbine Disc Rim Cavities,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-68592.
14.
Clark
,
K.
,
Barringer
,
M.
, and
Thole
,
K.
,
2016
, “Using a Tracer Gas to Quantify Sealing Effectiveness for Engine Realistic Rim Seals,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-58095.
15.
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Hualca
,
F. P.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2017
, “Egress Interaction Through Turbine Rim Seals,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-64632.
You do not currently have access to this content.