Engine designers require accurate predictions of ingestion (or ingress) principally caused by circumferential pressure asymmetry in the mainstream annulus. Cooling air systems provide purge flow designed to limit metal temperatures and protect vulnerable components from the hot gases which would otherwise be entrained into disk cavities through clearances between rotating and static disks. Rim seals are fitted at the periphery of these disks to minimize purge. The mixing between the efflux of purge (or egress) and the mainstream gases near the hub end-wall results in a deterioration of aerodynamic performance. This paper presents experimental results using a turbine test rig with wheel-spaces upstream and downstream of a rotor disk. Ingress and egress was quantified using a CO2 concentration probe, with seeding injected into the upstream and downstream sealing flows. The probe measurements have identified an outer region in the wheel-space and confirmed the expected flow structure. For the first time, asymmetric variations of concentration have been shown to penetrate through the seal clearance and the outer portion of the wheel-space between the disks. For a given flow coefficient in the annulus, the concentration profiles were invariant with rotational Reynolds number. The measurements also reveal that the egress provides a film-cooling benefit on the vane and rotor platforms. Further, these measurements provide unprecedented insight into the flow interaction and provide quantitative data for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation, which should help to reduce the use of purge and improve engine efficiency.

References

References
1.
Rose
,
M. G.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
Seaman
,
P.
,
Newman
,
D. A.
, and
McManus
,
D.
,
2001
, “
Improving the Efficiency of the Trent 500 HP Turbine Using Non-Axisymmetric End Walls—Part II: Experimental Validation
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2001-GT-0505.
2.
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
,
Owen
,
J. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2016
, “
Review of Ingress in Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
12
), p.
120801
.
3.
Patinios
,
M.
,
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
,
Owen
,
J. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2017
, “
Measurements and Modelling of Ingress in a New 1.5-Stage Turbine Research Facility
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
139
(
1
), p.
012603
.
4.
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Hualca
,
F. P.
,
Patinios
,
M.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
,
Owen
,
J. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2017
, “
Re-Ingestion of Upstream Egress in a 1.5-Stage Gas Turbine Rig
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-64620.
5.
Owen
,
J. M.
,
2011
, “
Prediction of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals. Part II: Externally Induced and Combined Ingress
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031006
.
6.
Ong
,
J. H. P.
,
Miller
,
R. J.
, and
Uchida
,
S.
,
2006
, “
The Effect of Coolant Injection on the Endwall Flow of a High Pressure Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-91060.
7.
Regina
,
K.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Investigation of Purge Flow Effects on a High Pressure Turbine Stage
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-69466.
8.
Wang
,
C. Z.
,
de Jong
,
F.
,
Johnson
,
B. V.
, and
Vashist
,
T. K.
,
2007
, “
Comparison of Flow Characteristics in Axial-Gap Seals for Close- and Wide-Spaced Turbine Stages
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27909.
9.
Boudet
,
J.
,
Hills
,
N. J.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
2006
, “
Numerical Simulation of the Flow Interaction Between Turbine Main Annulus and Disc Cavities
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90307.
10.
Popovic
,
I.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
2013
, “
Improving Turbine Stage Efficiency and Sealing Effectiveness Through Modifications of the Rim Seal Geometry
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
6
), p.
061016
.
11.
Schüpbach
,
P.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Rose
,
M. G.
, and
Gier
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Influence of Rim Seal Purge Flow on the Performance of an Endwall-Profiled Axial Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
2
), p.
021011
.
12.
Turgut
,
Ö. H.
, and
Camci
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Influence of Leading Edge Fillet and Nonaxisymmetric Contoured Endwall on Turbine NGV Exit Flow Structure and Interactions With the Rim Seal Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-95843.
13.
Regina
,
K.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Lohaus
,
A.
,
Voelker
,
S.
, and
auf dem Kampe
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Aerodynamic Robustness of End Wall Contouring Against Rim Seal Purge Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26007.
14.
Green
,
T.
, and
Turner
,
A. B.
,
1994
, “
Ingestion Into the Upstream Wheelspace of an Axial Turbine Stage
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
(
2
), pp.
327
332
.
15.
Clark
,
K.
,
Barringer
,
M.
, and
Thole
,
K.
,
2016
, “
Using a Tracer Gas to Quantify Sealing Effectiveness for Engine Realistic Rim Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-58095.
16.
Lindqvist
,
L. O.
,
Wickholm
,
J. E.
,
Torisson
,
T.
, and
Fransson
,
T. H.
,
2000
, “
Investigation of the Spanwise Transport of the Rotor-Stator Slot Flow in a Test Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2000-GT0485.
17.
Dahlqvist
,
J.
, and
Fridh
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Seedgas Investigation of Turbine Stage and Seal Performance at Varying Cavity Purge Rates and Operating Speeds
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-64295.
18.
Patinios
,
M.
,
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
2017
, “
Measurements of Ingress in Upstream and Downstream Turbine Wheel-Spaces
,” 12th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Stockholm, Sweden, Apr. 3–7, Paper No.
ETC2017-287
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319980829_Measurements_of_Ingress_in_Upstream_and_Downstream_Turbine_Wheel-Spaces
You do not currently have access to this content.