Brush seals are a mature technology that has generated extensive experimental and theoretical work. Theoretical models range from simple correlations with experimental results to advanced numerical approaches coupling the bristles deformation with the flow in the brush. The present work follows this latter path. The bristles of the brush are deformed by the pressure applied by the flow, by the interference with the rotor and with the back plate. The bristles are modeled as linear beams but a nonlinear numerical algorithm deals with the interferences. The brush with its deformed bristles is then considered as an anisotropic porous medium for the leakage flow. Taking into account, the variation of the permeability with the local geometric and flow conditions represents the originality of the present work. The permeability following the principal directions of the bristles is estimated from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. A representative number of bristles are selected for each principal direction and the CFD analysis domain is delimited by periodicity and symmetry boundary conditions. The parameters of the CFD analysis are the local Reynolds number and the local porosity estimated from the distance between the bristles. The variations of the permeability are thus deduced for each principal direction and for Reynolds numbers and porosities characteristic for brush seal. The leakage flow rates predicted by the present approach are compared with experimental results from the literature. The results depict also the variations of the pressures, of the local Reynolds number, of the permeability, and of the porosity through the entire brush seal.

References

1.
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
Schlumberger
,
S.
,
Braun
,
M. J.
,
Choy
,
F.
, and
Mullen
,
R. L.
,
1991
, “A Bulk Flow Model of a Brush Seal System,”
ASME
Paper No. 91-GT-325.
2.
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
Braun
,
M. J.
,
Canacci
,
V.
, and
Mullen
,
R. L.
,
1990
, “
Brush Seal in Vehicle Tribology
,”
17th Leeds/Lyon Symposium
, Leeds, UK, Sept. 4–7.
3.
Chupp
,
R. E.
,
Holle
,
G. F.
, and
Dowler
,
C. A.
,
1991
, “
Simple Leakage Flow Model for Brush Seals
,”
27th Joint Propulsion Conference
, Sacramento, CA, June 24–26.http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991jpsc.confT....C
4.
Chupp
,
R. E.
, and
Holle
,
G. F.
,
1996
, “
Generalizing Circular Brush Seal Leakage Through a Randomly Distributed Bristle Bed
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
(1), pp.
153
161
.
5.
Braun
,
M. J.
, and
Kudriavtsev
,
V. V.
,
1995
, “
A Numerical Simulation of Brush Seal Section and Some Experimental Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
(1), pp.
190
202
.
6.
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Lapworth
,
B. L.
, and
Millener
,
P. J.
,
1995
, “
Mathematical Modelling of Brush Seals
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
16
(6), pp.
493
500
.
7.
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Hogg
,
S. I.
,
1997
, “
Porosity Modelling of Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
(4), pp.
769
775
.
8.
Dogu
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
Investigation of Brush Seal Flow Characteristics Using Bulk Porous Medium Approach
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
(1), pp.
136
144
.
9.
Pröstler
,
S.
,
2005
, “Modellierung und numerische Berechnungen von Wellenabdichtungen in Bürstenbauart,” Ph.D. dissertation, Bochum Universität, Bochum, Germany.
10.
Guardino
,
C.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
2005
, “
Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Bristle Bending in Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
(3), pp.
583
591
.
11.
Aksit
,
M. F.
, and
Tichy
,
J. A.
,
1996
, “
A Computational Model of Brush Seal Bristle Deflection
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 1996-2909.
12.
Darcy
,
H. P. G.
,
1856
,
Les Fontaines Publiques De La Ville De Dijon
,
Victor Dalmont
,
Paris, France
.
13.
Ergun
,
S.
,
1952
, “
Fluid Flow Through Packed Columns
,”
Chem. Eng. Prog.
,
48
(2), pp.
89
94
.
14.
Ergun
,
S.
, and
Orning
,
A. A.
,
1949
, “
Fluid Flow Through Randomly Packed Columns and Fluidized Beds
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem.
,
41
(6), pp.
1179
1184
.
15.
Joseph
,
D.
,
Nield
,
D.
, and
Papanicolaou
,
G.
,
1982
, “
Nonlinear Equations Governing Flow in a Porous Medium
,”
Water Resour. Res.
,
18
(
4
), pp.
1049
1052
.
16.
Jambhekar
,
V. A.
,
2011
, “Forchheimer Porous-Media Flow Models—Numerical Investigation and Comparison With Experimental Data,”
Master's thesis
, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.http://www.hydrosys.uni-stuttgart.de/institut/hydrosys/publikationen/paper/2012/JambhekarMaster.pdf
17.
Gresham
,
T.
,
Weaver
,
B.
,
Wood
,
H.
, and
Untaroiu
,
A.
,
2016
, “Characterization of Brush Seal Permeability,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57910.
18.
Chilton
,
T. H.
, and
Colburn
,
A. P.
,
1931
, “
Pressure Drop in Packed Tubes
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem.
,
23
(
8
), pp.
913
919
.
19.
Solidworks
,
2017
, “Solidworks Flow Simulation,” Dassault Systemes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France, accessed Feb. 3, 2017, http://www.solidworks.fr/sw/products/simulation/flow-simulation.htm
20.
Bayley
,
F. J.
, and
Long
,
C. A.
,
1993
, “
A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of Flow and Pressure Distributions in a Brush Seal
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
(2), pp.
404
410
.
21.
Pugachev
,
A. O.
, and
Helm
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Calibration of Porous Medium Models for Brush Seals
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
223
(1), pp.
83
91
.
You do not currently have access to this content.