Over the last years, aero-engines are progressively evolving toward design concepts that permit improvements in terms of engine safety, fuel economy, and pollutant emissions. With the aim of satisfying the strict NOx reduction targets imposed by ICAO-CAEP, lean burn technology is one of the most promising solutions even if it must face safety concerns and technical issues. Hence, a depth insight on lean burn combustion is required, and computational fluid dynamics can be a useful tool for this purpose. In this work, a comparison in large eddy simulation (LES) framework of two widely employed combustion approaches like the artificially thickened flame (ATF) and the flamelet generated manifold (FGM) is performed using ANSYS fluent v16.2. Two literature test cases with increasing complexity in terms of geometry, flow field, and operating conditions are considered. First, capabilities of FGM are evaluated on a single swirler burner operating at ambient pressure with a standard pressure atomizer for spray injection. Then, a second test case, operated at 4 bar, is simulated. Here, kerosene fuel is burned after an injection through a prefilming airblast atomizer within a corotating double swirler. Obtained comparisons with experimental results show different capabilities of ATF and FGM in modeling the partially premixed behavior of the flame and provide an overview of the main strengths and limitations of the modeling strategies under investigation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research-Article
Modeling Strategies for Large Eddy Simulation of Lean Burn Spray Flames
S. Puggelli,
S. Puggelli
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: stefano.puggelli@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: stefano.puggelli@htc.de.unifi.it
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Bertini,
D. Bertini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: davide.bertini@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: davide.bertini@htc.de.unifi.it
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Mazzei,
L. Mazzei
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: lorenzo.mazzei@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: lorenzo.mazzei@htc.de.unifi.it
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Andreini
A. Andreini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: antonio.andreini@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: antonio.andreini@htc.de.unifi.it
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Puggelli
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: stefano.puggelli@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: stefano.puggelli@htc.de.unifi.it
D. Bertini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: davide.bertini@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: davide.bertini@htc.de.unifi.it
L. Mazzei
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: lorenzo.mazzei@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: lorenzo.mazzei@htc.de.unifi.it
A. Andreini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: antonio.andreini@htc.de.unifi.it
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: antonio.andreini@htc.de.unifi.it
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 26, 2017; final manuscript received August 9, 2017; published online November 21, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. May 2018, 140(5): 051501 (11 pages)
Published Online: November 21, 2017
Article history
Received:
July 26, 2017
Revised:
August 9, 2017
Citation
Puggelli, S., Bertini, D., Mazzei, L., and Andreini, A. (November 21, 2017). "Modeling Strategies for Large Eddy Simulation of Lean Burn Spray Flames." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. May 2018; 140(5): 051501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038127
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Temperature Dependence of Aerated Turbine Lubricating Oil Degradation from a Lab-Scale Test Rig
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Multi-Disciplinary Surrogate-Based Optimization of a Compressor Rotor Blade Considering Ice Impact
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Experimental Investigations on Carbon Segmented Seals With Smooth and Pocketed Pads
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Assessment of Scale-Resolved Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods for the Investigation of Lean Burn Spray Flames
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (February,2017)
A Large-Eddy Simulation–Linear-Eddy Model Study of Preferential Diffusion Processes in a Partially Premixed Swirling Combustor With Synthesis Gases
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March,2017)
Damkohler Number Analysis in Lean Blow-Out of Toroidal Jet Stirred Reactor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,2018)
Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes and Large-Eddy Simulation Investigation of Lean Premixed Gas Turbine Combustor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Outlook
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Numerical Modeling of N O x Emission in Turbulant Spray Flames Using Thermal and Fuel Models
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3