This article presents the application of statistical methods to guide the rotordynamic design of a turbogenerator shaft-line. One of the basic requirements is all shaft components must survive the event of a short circuit at the terminals of the generator. This is typically assessed via a transient response simulation of the complete machine train (including generator's electrical model) to check the calculated response torque against the allowable value. With an increasing demand of a shorter design cycle and competition in performance, cost, footprint, and safety, the probabilistic approach is starting to play an important role in the power train design process. The main challenge arises with the size of the design space and complexity of its mapping onto multiple objective functions and criteria which are defined for different machines. In this paper, the authors give an example demonstrating the use of statistical methods to explore (design of experiment (DoE)) and understand (surface response methods) the design space of the combined cycle power train with respect to the typically most severe constraint (fault torque torsional response), which leads to a quicker definition of a turbogenerator's arrangement. Further statistical analyses are carried out to understand the robustness of the chosen design against future modifications as well as parameters' uncertainties.

References

References
1.
Karl
,
A.
,
May
,
G.
,
Barcock
,
C.
,
Webster
,
G.
, and
Bayley
,
N.
,
2006
, “
Robust Design: Methods and Application to Real World Examples
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90649.
2.
Wagner
,
F.
,
Kühhorn
,
A.
, and
Parchem
,
R.
, “
Robust Design Optimization Applied to a High Pressure Turbine Blade Based on Surrogate Modelling Techniques
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42365.
3.
Thakur
,
N.
,
Keane
,
A. J.
, and
Nair
,
P. B.
,
2011
, “
Robust Design of Turbine Blades Against Manufacturing Variability
,”
J. Reliab. Saf.
,
5
(
3/4
), pp.
420
436
.
4.
Gorelik
,
M.
,
Obayomi
,
J.
,
Slovisky
,
J.
,
Frias
,
D.
, and
Swanson
,
H.
,
2013
, “
Effect of Manufacturing Variability on Turbine Engine Performance—A Probabilistic Study
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-95145.
5.
Rémond
,
D.
,
Faverjon
,
B.
, and
Sinou
,
J. J.
,
2011
, “
Analysing the Dynamic Response of a Rotor System Under Uncertain Parameters Polynomial Chaos Expansion
,”
J. Vib. Control
,
18
(
5
), pp.
712
732
.
6.
Koroishi
,
E. H.
,
Cavalini
,
A.
,
de Lima
,
A. M. G.
, and
Steffen
,
V.
,
2012
, “
Stochastic Modeling of Flexible Rotors
,”
J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.
,
XXXIV
(
spec2
), pp.
575
583
.
7.
Stocki
,
R.
,
Szolc
,
T.
,
Tauzowski
,
P.
, and
Knabel
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Robust Design Optimization of the Vibrating Rotor Shaft System Subjected to Selected Dynamic Constraints
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
29
, pp.
34
44
.
8.
Becker
,
K.
,
2008
, “
Rotordynamics and Uncertainty of Variables in Gas Turbine
,” 12th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC-12), Honolulu, HI, Feb. 17–22, pp.
153
160
.
9.
IEC
, 2005, “
Rotating Electrical Machines—Part 3, Specific Requirements for Cylindrical Rotor Synchronous Machines
,”
5th ed.
, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No.
IEC 60034-3
.
10.
Montgomery
,
D. C.
, 2012,
Design and Analysis of Experiments
, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
11.
Ryan
,
B.
,
Joiner
,
B.
, and
Cryer
,
J.
, 2012,
MINITAB Handbook: Update for Release 16
, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.