Micro gas turbine (MGT) technology is evolving toward a large variety of novel applications, such as weak gas electrification, inverted Brayton cycles, and fuel cell hybrid cycles; however, many of these systems show very different dynamic behaviors compared to conventional MGTs. In addition, some applications impose more stringent requirements on transient maneuvers, e.g., to limit temperature and pressure gradients in a fuel cell hybrid cycle. Besides providing operational safety, optimizing system dynamics to meet the variable power demand of modern energy markets is also of increasing significance. Numerical cycle simulation programs are crucial tools to analyze these dynamics without endangering the machines, and to meet the challenges of automatic control design. For these tasks, complete cycle simulations of transient maneuvers lasting several minutes need to be calculated. Moreover, sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic properties like automatic control systems require many simulation runs. To perform these calculations in an acceptable timeframe, simplified component models based on lumped volume or one-dimensional discretization schemes are necessary. The accuracy of these models can be further improved by parameter identification, as most novel applications are modifications of well-known MGT systems and rely on proven, characterized components. This paper introduces a modular in-house simulation tool written in fortran to simulate the dynamic behavior of conventional and novel gas turbine cycles. Thermodynamics, gas composition, heat transfer to the casing and surroundings, shaft rotation and control system dynamics as well as mass and heat storage are simulated together to account for their interactions. While the presented models preserve a high level of detail, they also enable calculation speeds up to five times faster than real-time. The simulation tool is explained in detail, including a description of all component models, coupling of the elements and the ODE solver. Finally, validation results of the simulator based on measurement data from the DLR Turbec T100 recuperated MGT test rig are presented, including cold start-up and shutdown maneuvers.

References

References
1.
U.S. Energy Information Administration
,
2015
, “
Annual Energy Outlook 2015 With Projections to 2040
,” Report No. DOE/EIA-0383(2015).
2.
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change)
, 2015, “
Adoption of the Paris Agreement
,” Agreement No. fccc/cp/2015/l.9/rev.1.
3.
Birol
,
F.
,
2015
, “
World Energy Outlook 2015
,” International Energy Agency, Paris.
4.
Darrow
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Catalog of CHP Technologies
,”
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, Washington, DC.
5.
Pilavachi
,
P.
,
2002
, “
Mini-and Micro-Gas Turbines for Combined Heat and Power
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
22
(
18
), pp.
2003
2014
.
6.
Henke
,
M.
,
Monz
,
T.
, and
Aigner
,
M.
, 2013, “
Inverted Brayton Cycle With Exhaust Gas Recirculation—A Numerical Investigation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
135
(
9
), p. 091203.
7.
Hohloch
,
M.
,
Huber
,
A.
, and
Aigner
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Experimental Investigation of a SOFC/MGT Hybrid Power Plant Test Rig—Impact and Characterization of a Fuel Cell Emulator
,” ASME Paper No. GT2016-57747.
8.
McLarty
,
D.
,
Brouwer
,
J.
, and
Samuelsen
,
S.
,
2013
, “
Hybrid Fuel Cell Gas Turbine System Design and Optimization
,”
ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
,
10
(
4
), p.
041005
.
9.
Traverso
,
A.
,
2005
, “
TRANSEO Code for the Dynamic Performance Simulation of Micro Gas Turbine Cycles
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68101.
10.
Damo
,
U.
,
Ferrari
,
M.
,
Turan
,
A.
, and
Massardo
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Test Rig for Hybrid System Emulation: New Real-Time Transient Model Validated in a Wide Operative Range
,”
Fuel Cells
,
15
(
1
), pp.
7
14
.
11.
Wächter
,
C.
,
Lunderstädt
,
R.
, and
Joos
,
F.
,
2006
, “
Dynamic Model of a Pressurized SOFC/Gas Turbine Hybrid Power Plant for the Development of Control Concepts
,”
ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
,
3
(
3
), pp.
271
279
.
12.
Kroll
,
F.
,
Nielsen
,
A.
, and
Staudacher
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Transient Performance and Control System Design of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell/Gas Turbine Hybrids
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50232.
13.
Goos
,
E.
,
Burcat
,
A.
, and
Ruscic
,
B.
,
2010
, “
Extended Third Millennium Ideal Gas and Condensed Phase Thermochemical Database for Combustion With Updates From Active Thermochemical Tables
,” Elke Goos, Remchingen, Germany, accessed Sept. 19, 2016, http://burcat.technion.ac.il/dir/BURCAT.THR
14.
VDI Gesellschaft
,
2006
,
VDI-Wärmeatlas
,
10th ed.
,
Springer
,
Berlin, Germany
.
15.
Ang
,
K. H.
,
Chong
,
G.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
PID Control System Analysis, Design, and Technology
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
13
(
4
), pp.
559
576
.
16.
Bohl
,
W.
,
1991
,
Technische Strömungslehre
,
9th ed.
,
Vogel Verlag und Druck GmbH
, Würzburg, Germany.
17.
Cerbe
,
G.
,
2008
,
Technische Thermodynamik
,
15th ed.
,
Carl Hanser Verlag
, Munich, Germany.
18.
Hohloch
,
M.
,
Widenhorn
,
A.
,
Lebküchner
,
D.
,
Panne
,
T.
, and
Aigner
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Micro Gas Turbine Test Rig for Hybrid Power Plant Application
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50443.
19.
Hohloch
,
M.
,
Zanger
,
J.
,
Widenhorn
,
A.
, and
Aigner
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Experimental Characterization of a Micro Gas Turbine Test Rig
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22799.
20.
Henke
,
M.
,
Klempp
,
N.
,
Hohloch
,
M.
,
Monz
,
T.
, and
Aigner
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Validation of a t100 Micro Gas Turbine Steady-State Simulation Tool
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42090.
21.
Utriainen
,
E.
, and
Sundén
,
B.
,
2002
, “
A Numerical Investigation of Primary Surface Rounded Cross Wavy Ducts
,”
Heat Mass Transfer
,
38
(
7–8
), pp.
537
542
.
22.
Kurzke
,
J.
, 2016, “
Gasturb—The Gas Turbine Performance Simulation Program
,” Daniel Weintraub, Aachen, German, accessed Sept. 19, 2016, http://www.gasturb.de
23.
Ziegler
,
J. G.
, and
Nichols
,
N. B.
,
1942
, “
Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers
,”
Trans. ASME
,
64
(
11
), pp.
759
765
.
You do not currently have access to this content.