In this paper, we present an extensive numerical study on the interaction between the downstream fan and the flow separating over an intake under high incidence. The objectives of this investigation are twofold: (a) to gain qualitative insight into the mechanism of fan–intake interaction and (b) to quantitatively examine the effect of the proximity of the fan on the inlet distortion. The fan proximity is altered using the key design parameter, L/D, where D is the diameter of the intake, and L is the distance of the fan from the intake lip. Both steady and unsteady Reynolds-averaged numerical simulations (RANS) were carried out. For the steady calculations, a low-order fan model has been used, while a full 3D geometry has been used for the unsteady RANS. The numerical methodology is also thoroughly validated against the measurements for the intake-only and fan-only configurations on a high bypass ratio turbofan intake and fan, respectively. To systematically study the effect of fan on the intake separation and explore the design criteria, a simplified intake–fan configuration has been considered. In this fan–intake model, the proximity of the fan to the intake separation (L/D) can be conveniently altered without affecting other parameters. The key results indicate that, depending on L/D, the fan has either suppressed the level of the postseparation distortion or increased the separation-free operating range. At the lowest L/D (∼0.17), around a 5 deg increase in the separation-free angle of incidence was achieved. This delay in the separation-free angle of incidence decreased with increasing L/D. At the largest L/D (∼0.44), the fan was effective in suppressing the postseparation distortion rather than entirely eliminating the separation. Isentropic Mach number distribution over the intake lip for different L/D's revealed that the fan accelerates the flow near the casing upstream of the fan face, thereby decreasing the distortion level in the immediate vicinity. However, this acceleration effect decayed rapidly with increasing upstream distance from the fan-face.

References

References
1.
Oriji
,
U. R.
, and
Tucker
,
P. G.
,
2014
, “
Modular Turbulence Modelling Applied to an Engine Intake
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
5
), p.
051004
.
2.
Hall
,
C. A.
, and
Hynes
,
T. P.
,
2006
, “
Measurements of Intake Separation Hysteresis in a Model Fan and Nacelle Rig
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
4
), pp.
872
879
.
3.
Freeman
,
C.
, and
Rowe
,
A. L.
,
1999
, “
Intake Engine Interactions of a Modern Large Turbofan Engine
,”
ASME
Paper No. 99-GT-344.
4.
Larkin
,
M. J.
, and
Schweiger
,
P. S.
,
1992
, “
Ultra High Bypass Nacelle Aerodynamics, Inlet Flow-Through High Angle-of-Attack Distortion Test
,”
NASA Report No. CR-189149
.
5.
Boldman
,
D. R.
,
Iek
,
C.
, and
Hwang
,
D. P.
,
1993
, “
Effect of a Rotating Propeller on the Separation Angle of Attack and Distortion in Ducted Propeller Inlets
,”
NASA Technical Memorandum, Report No. 105935
.
6.
Peters
,
A.
,
Spakovszky
,
Z. S.
,
Lord
,
W. K.
, and
Rose
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Ultrashort Nacelles for Low Fan Pressure Ratio Propulsors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
2
), p.
021001
.
7.
Hodder
,
B. K.
,
1981
, “
An Investigation of Engine Influence on Inlet Performance
,”
NASA Technical Report, Report No. CR-166136
.
8.
Kennedy
,
S.
,
Robinson
,
T.
,
Spence
,
S.
, and
Richardson
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Computational Investigation of Inlet Distortion at High Angles of Attack
,”
J. Aircr.
,
51
(
2
), pp.
361
376
.
9.
Hsiao
,
E.
,
Naimi
,
M.
,
Lewis
,
J. P.
,
Dalbey
,
K.
,
Gong
,
Y.
, and
Tan
,
C.
,
2001
, “
Actuator Duct Model of Turbomachinery Components for Powered-Nacelle Navier–Stokes Calculations
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
17
(
4
), pp.
919
927
.
10.
Iek
,
C.
, and
Boldman
,
D.
,
1993
, “
3-D Viscous Flow CFD Analysis of the Propeller Effect on an Advanced Ducted Propeller Subsonic Inlet
,”
NASA Technical Memorandum, Report No. 106240
.
11.
Carnevale
,
M.
,
Wang
,
F.
,
Green
,
J. S.
, and
Di Mare
,
L.
,
2016
, “
Lip Stall Supression in Powered Intakes
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
32
(
1
), pp.
161
170
.
12.
Lapworth
,
B. L.
,
2004
, “
Hydra-CFD: A Framework for Collaborative CFD Development
,”
International Conference on Scientific and Engineering Computation (IC-SEC)
,
Singapore
.
13.
Watson
,
R.
,
2013
, “
Large Eddy Simulation of Cutback Trailing Edges for Film Cooling Turbine Blades
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
14.
Sabino
,
L.
,
Tucker
,
P. G.
, and
Watson
,
J.
, “
Modelling of Coupled Open Rotor Engine Intakes
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-840.
15.
Spalart
,
P.
, and
Allmaras
,
S.
,
1992
, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 92-0439.
16.
Cao
,
T.
,
Hield
,
P.
, and
Tucker
,
P. G.
,
2016
, “
Hierarchical Immersed Boundary Method With Smeared Geometry
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2016-2130.
You do not currently have access to this content.