The difference of a stationary forced response situation of a turbine or compressor blade relative to a transient resonance sweep is well known and documented in the literature. Different approaches have been used to understand the effect on transient amplitude in comparison with forced response. The dependencies on damping levels and resonance passage speed have been noted. Estimates for a critical or/and maximum sweep velocity have been given. The understanding of transient response during resonance sweep is of practical importance for instance when running a certification stress test for an aircraft engine, where it needs to be decided upfront which acceleration rate (increase in rpm per second) to use to ensure that the maximum airfoil response that could be attained under stationary condition is being measured with sufficient precision. A second reason for understanding of transient response is the verification of correct, if relevant lower, component life usage during transient regimes in operation. This paper gives a proposal for a simple 1D method based on one degree-of-freedom (1DOF) system considerations for estimating the transient response dependency on the sweep velocity, damping levels, and resonance frequency. The method is verified with 3D analyses of more complex blade–disk structures, which have been validated with air jet excitation rig and aero-engine tests. Using the results of the 1DOF analysis, an estimate of the expected stationary resonance response increase can be formulated even in cases where the measured data are based on a significant deviation from the desired sweep velocity, where transient effects would be significant.

References

1.
Ewins
,
D. J.
,
2000
,
Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application
,
Research Studies Press
, Baldock, UK.
2.
ISO
,
2015
, “
Vibration and Shock—Experimental Determination of Mechanical Mobility—Part 2: Measurements Using Single-Point Translation Excitation With an Attached Vibration Exciter
,” International Organization for Standardization (
ISO
), Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 7626-2:2015.
3.
Lewis
,
F. M.
,
1932
, “
Vibration During Acceleration Through a Critical Speed
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
54
, pp.
258
261
.
4.
Zeller
,
W.
,
1949
, “
Näherungsverfahren zur Bestimmung der beim Durchfahren der Resonanz auftretenden Höchstamplitude
,”
Motortech. Z.
,
10
, pp.
11
12
.
5.
Markert
,
R.
, and
Seidler
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Analytically Based Estimation of the Maximum Amplitude During Passage Through Resonance
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
38
(
10–13
), pp.
1975
1992
.
6.
Ayers
,
J. P.
,
Feiner
,
D. M.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
2006
, “
A Reduced-Order Model for Transient Analysis of Bladed Disk Forced Response
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
3
), pp.
466
473
.
7.
Torvik
,
P. J.
,
2011
, “
On Estimating System Damping From Frequency Response Bandwidths
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
330
(
25
), pp.
6088
6097
.
8.
Bonhage
,
M.
,
Panning
,
V.
,
Scheidt
,
L.
,
Wallaschek
,
J.
, and
Richter
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Transient Resonance Passage With Respect to Friction
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-68986.
9.
Hartung
,
A.
,
2010
, “
A Numerical Approach for the Resonance Passage Computation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22051.
10.
Hartung
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Blade Vibrations: Steady State Forced Response and Transient Measurements
,”
19th Blade Mechanics Seminar
, Winterthur, Switzerland, Sept. 11.
11.
Retze
,
U.
,
2014
, “
Excitation Rig
,”
19th Blade Mechanics Seminar
, Winterthur, Switzerland, Sept. 11.
12.
Scilab Enterprises
,
2012
, “
Scilab: Free and Open Source Software for Numerical Computation, Version 5.41
,” Scilab Enterprises, Versailles, France, http://www.scilab.org
You do not currently have access to this content.