Swirl brake influences the static and rotordynamic characteristics of labyrinth seal which are important in the prediction of turbomachine stability. To study the influence of the swirl brakes on improving seal stability, the effects of swirl brakes on the static and rotordynamic characteristics of labyrinth seals were investigated by the combination of numerical simulation and experiment. First, it was performed to the effects of swirl brake on the static flow characteristics of labyrinth seal with swirl ratio and pressure distribution based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD). And then a comparison between leakage predicted by the CFD model and measurement was presented to verify the accuracy of the simulation. Moreover, an experiment was implemented to analyze the rotordynamic characteristics of labyrinth seal using an improved impedance method based on an unbalanced synchronous excitation method on a rotor test rig. The influences of swirl brake density, length, inlet/outlet pressure ratio, and rotating speed were measured and discussed, respectively. The CFD numerical results show that the swirl brake effectively reduces the seal swirl ratio (∼60–75% less), circumferential pressure difference (∼25–85% less) so that the seal destabilizing forces decrease. With the increasing of the swirl vanes density and length, the seal leakage drops (∼8–20% less). The experimental rotordynamic characteristics results show that it is more obvious to reduce the cross-couple stiffness (∼50–300% less) and increase the direct damping (∼50–60% larger) with the increasing in the number and length of the swirl vanes, and thus the swirl brake improves the seal rotordynamic stability. The efforts of this paper provide a useful insight to clearly understand the effects of swirl brakes on the labyrinth seal static and rotordynamic characteristics, which is beneficial to improve the design of annular seals.

References

1.
Gao
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Computational Fluid Dynamic and Rotordynamic Study on the Labyrinth Seals
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
2.
Li
,
Z. G.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Feng
,
Z. P.
,
2014
, “
Numerical Investigations on the Leakage and Rotordynamic Characteristics of Pocket Damper Seals—Part II: Effects of Partition Wall Type, Partition Wall Number, and Cavity Depth
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
3
), p.
032504
.
3.
Mehta
,
N. J.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
,
2013
, “
Measured Comparison of Leakage and Rotordynamic Characteristics for a Slanted-Tooth and a Straight-Tooth Labyrinth Seal
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
1
), p.
012501
.
4.
Gao
,
H. P.
,
Li
,
B. R.
,
Fu
,
X. Y.
, and
Yang
,
G.
,
2015
, “
A Strong Coupled Fluid Structure Interaction Solution for Transient Soft Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication Problems in Reciprocating Rod Seals Based on a Combined Moving Mesh Method
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
137
(
4
), p.
041501
.
5.
Kirk
,
G.
, and
Gao
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Influence of Preswirl on Rotordynamic Characteristics of Labyrinth Seals
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
55
(
3
), pp.
357
364
.
6.
Brown
,
P. D.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
,
2012
, “
Measurement Versus Predictions of Rotordynamic Coefficients of a Hole-Pattern Gas Seal With Negative Preswirl
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
12
), p.
122503
.
7.
Ertas
,
B. H.
,
Delgado
,
A.
, and
Vannini
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for Three Types of Annular Gas Seals With Inlet Preswirl and High Differential Pressure Ratio
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
4
), p.
042503
.
8.
Moore
,
J. J.
, and
Soulas
,
T. A.
,
2003
, “
Damper Seal Comparison in a High-Pressure Re-Injection Centrifugal Compressor During Full-Load, Full-Pressure Factory Testing Using Direct Rotordynamic Stability Measurement
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2003/VIB-48458.
9.
Takahashi
,
N.
,
Miura
,
H.
,
Narita
,
M.
,
Nishijima
,
N.
, and
Magara
,
Y.
,
2014
, “
Development of Scallop Cut Type Damper Seal for Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
3
), p.
032509
.
10.
Gelin
,
A.
,
Pugnet
,
J. M.
,
Bolusset
,
D.
, and
Friez
,
P.
,
1997
, “
Experience in Full-Load Testing of Natural Gas Centrifugal Compressors for Rotordynamics Improvements
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
119
(
1997
), pp.
934
941
.
11.
Kuzdzal
,
M.
,
Hustak
,
J.
, and
Sorokes
,
J.
,
1994
, “
Identification and Resolution of Aerodynamically Induced Subsynchronous Vibration During Hydrocarbon Testing of a 34,000 HP Centrifugal Compressor
,”
IFToMM 4th International Conference on Rotordynamics
, Chicago, Sept. 6–9, pp.
143
151
.
12.
Kim
,
N.
,
Park
,
S. Y.
, and
Rhode
,
D.
,
2003
, “
Predicted Effects of Shunt Injection on the Rotordynamics of Gas Labyrinth Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
125
(
1
), pp.
167
174
.
13.
Soto
,
E. A.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
,
1999
, “
Experimental Rotordynamic Coefficient Results for (a) a Labyrinth Seal With and Without Shunt Injection and (b) a Honeycomb Seal
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
(
1
), pp.
153
159
.
14.
Benckert
,
H.
, and
Wachter
,
J.
,
1980
, “
Flow Induced Spring Coefficients of Labyrinth Seals for Application in Rotor Dynamics
,” Workshop on Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High-Performance Turbomachinery, Houston, TX, May 12–14, NASA Conf. Pub. 2133, pp.
189
212
.
15.
Gans
,
B.
,
2007
, “
Reverse-Swirl Swirl Brakes Retrofitting With Brush Seals
,”
Turbomach. Int.
,
Sept./Oct.
, pp.
48
49
.
16.
Nielsen
,
K. K.
,
Myllerup
,
C.
, and
Braemnussche
,
R. V.
,
1998
, “
Optimization of Swirl Brakes by Means of a 3D Navier-Stokes Solver
,”
ASME
Paper No. 98-GT-328.
17.
Nielsen
,
K. K.
,
Myllerup
,
C.
, and
van den Braemnussche
,
R. A.
,
1999
, “
Parametric Study of the Flow in Swirl Brakes by Means of a 3D Navier-Stokes Solver
,” Third European Conference on Turbomachinery, London, Mar. 2–5, pp.
489
498
.
18.
Moore
,
J. J.
, and
Hill
,
D. L.
,
2000
, “
Design of Swirl Brakes for High Pressure Centrifugal Compressors Using CFD Techniques
,”
8th International Symposium of Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery
(
ISROMAC-8
), Honolulu, HI, Mar. 26–30, pp.
1124
1132
.
19.
Nielsen
,
K. K.
,
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Myllerup
,
C. W.
,
2001
, “
Experimental and Theoretical Comparison of Two Swirl Brake Designs
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
2
), pp.
353
358
.
20.
Kirk
,
R. G.
, and
Guo
,
Z.
,
2009
, “
Influence of Leak Path Friction on Labyrinth Seal Inlet Swirl
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
52
(
2
), pp.
139
145
.
21.
Kirk
,
R. G.
, and
Guo
,
Z.
,
2007
, “
Leak Path Geometry Influence on Labyrinth Seal Inlet Swirl Velocity Ratio
,”
BHR 19th International Conference on Fluid Sealing
, BHR Group, Poitiers, France, Sept. 25–26.
22.
Baldassarre
,
L.
,
Bernocchi
,
A.
,
Fontana
,
M.
,
Guglielmo
,
A.
, and
Masi
,
G.
,
2014
, “
Optimization of Swirl Brake Design and Assessment of Its Stabilizing Effect on Compressor Rotordynamic Performance
,”
43rd Turbomachinery and 30th Pump Users Symposia
(
Pump and Turbo 2014
), Houston, TX, Sept. 23–25.
23.
Chae
,
H. L.
,
2009
, “
A Numerical and Experimental Study of Windback Seals
,” Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
24.
Cao
,
H.
,
Yang
,
J.
, and
Zhang
,
W.
,
2013
, “
An Experimental Identification Model of Rotordynamic Coefficients of Seals Using Unbalanced Synchronous Excitation Method
,”
J. Mech. Sci. Technol.
,
27
(
7
), pp.
1885
1992
.
You do not currently have access to this content.