This paper studies the effect of brush seal segmentation on the seal performance characteristics. A brush–labyrinth sealing configuration arranged of one brush seal downstream and two labyrinth fins upstream is studied experimentally and theoretically. The studied brush seal is of welded design installed with zero cold radial clearance. The brush seal front and back rings as well as the bristle pack are segmented radially in a single plane using the electrical discharge machining (EDM) technique. The segmentation procedure results in loss of bristles at the site of the cuts altering the leakage flow structure in the seal and its performance characteristics. Two test rigs are used to obtain leakage, as well as rotordynamic stiffness and damping coefficients of the seal at different pressure ratios. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based model is used to predict the seal performance and to study in detail local changes in the flow field due to the segmentation. A back-to-back comparison of the performance of nonsegmented and segmented brush seals as well as baseline labyrinth seal is provided. The obtained results demonstrate that the segmentation in general negatively affects the performance of the studied brush–labyrinth sealing configuration. However, the segmented brush seal shows increased direct damping coefficients.

References

1.
Aksit
,
M.
,
Chupp
,
R.
,
Dinc
,
S.
, and
Demiroglu
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Advanced Seals for Industrial Turbine Applications: Design Approach and Static Seal Development
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
18
(
6
), pp.
1254
1259
.
2.
Chupp
,
R.
,
Ghasripoor
,
F.
,
Turnquist
,
N.
,
Demiroglu
,
M.
, and
Aksit
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Advanced Seals for Industrial Turbine Applications: Dynamic Seal Development
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
18
(
6
), pp.
1260
1266
.
3.
Chupp
,
R.
,
Hendricks
,
R.
,
Lattime
,
S.
, and
Steinetz
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Sealing in Turbomachinery
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
2
), pp.
313
349
.
4.
Flower
,
R.
,
1990
, “
Brush Seal Development System
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 90-2143.
5.
Dinc
,
S.
,
Demiroglu
,
M.
,
Turnquist
,
N.
,
Mortzheim
,
J.
,
Goetze
,
G.
,
Maupin
,
J.
,
Hopkins
,
J.
,
Wolfe
,
C.
, and
Florin
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Fundamental Design Issues of Brush Seals for Industrial Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
2
), pp.
293
300
.
6.
Neef
,
M.
,
Sulda
,
E.
,
Sürken
,
N.
, and
Walkenhorst
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Design Features and Performance Details of Brush Seals for Turbine Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90404.
7.
Pastrana
,
R.
,
Wolfe
,
C.
,
Turnquist
,
N.
, and
Burnett
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Improved Steam Turbine Leakage Control With a Brush Seal Design
,”
30th Turbomachinery Symposium
, Houston, TX, Sept. 17–20, pp.
33
38
.
8.
Gaszner
,
M.
,
Pugachev
,
A. O.
,
Georgakis
,
C.
, and
Cooper
,
P.
,
2013
, “
Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of Brush Seals With Zero Cold Clearance Used in an Arrangement With Labyrinth Fins
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
135
(
12
), p.
122506
.
9.
Kwanka
,
K.
,
2001
,
Der Enfluss von Labyrinthdichtungen auf die Dynamik von Turbomaschinen
,
VDI-Verlag
,
Düsseldorf, Germany
.
10.
ANSYS
,
2013
, ansys cfx-Solver Theory Guide. Release 15.0, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
11.
Wu
,
J.
,
Yu
,
B.
, and
Yun
,
M.
,
2008
, “
A Resistance Model for Flow Through Porous Media
,”
Transp. Porous Media
,
71
(
3
), pp.
331
343
.
12.
Chew
,
J.
,
Lapworth
,
B.
, and
Millener
,
P.
,
1995
, “
Mathematical Modeling of Brush Seals
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
16
(
6
), pp.
493
500
.
13.
Chew
,
J.
, and
Hogg
,
S.
,
1997
, “
Porosity Modeling of Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
(
4
), pp.
769
775
.
14.
Pugachev
,
A. O.
,
2014
, “
Aggregation of Experimental and Theoretical Data for Brush Seal Leakage Evaluation
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2014-3598.
15.
Demiroglu
,
M.
,
Gursoy
,
M.
, and
Tichy
,
J. A.
,
2007
, “
An Investigation of Tip Force Characteristics of Brush Seals
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-28042.
You do not currently have access to this content.