A computationally efficient and cost effective simulation framework has been implemented to perform design space exploration and multi-objective optimization for a conceptual regenerative rotorcraft powerplant configuration at mission level. The proposed framework is developed by coupling a comprehensive rotorcraft mission analysis code with a design space exploration and optimization package. The overall approach is deployed to design and optimize the powerplant of a reference twin-engine light rotorcraft, modeled after the Bo105 helicopter, manufactured by Airbus Helicopters. Initially, a sensitivity analysis of the regenerative engine is carried out to quantify the relationship between the engine thermodynamic cycle design parameters, engine weight, and overall mission fuel economy. Second, through the execution of a multi-objective optimization strategy, a Pareto front surface is constructed, quantifying the optimum trade-off between the fuel economy offered by a regenerative engine and its associated weight penalty. The optimum sets of cycle design parameters obtained from the structured Pareto front suggest that the employed heat effectiveness is the key design parameter affecting the engine weight and fuel efficiency. Furthermore, through quantification of the benefits suggested by the acquired Pareto front, it is shown that the fuel economy offered by the simple cycle rotorcraft engine can be substantially improved with the implementation of regeneration technology, without degrading the payload-range capability and airworthiness (one-engine-inoperative) of the rotorcraft.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2015
Research-Article
Multi-objective Optimization of a Regenerative Rotorcraft Powerplant: Trade-off Between Overall Engine Weight and Fuel Economy
Fakhre Ali,
Fakhre Ali
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: f.ali@cranfield.ac.uk
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: f.ali@cranfield.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Konstantinos Tzanidakis,
Konstantinos Tzanidakis
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Ioannis Goulos,
Ioannis Goulos
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Vassilios Pachidis,
Vassilios Pachidis
Head of Gas Turbine Engineering
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: v.pachidis@cranfield.ac.uk
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: v.pachidis@cranfield.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Roberto d'Ippolito
Roberto d'Ippolito
NOESIS Solutions,
Gaston Geenslaan, 11, B4,
Leuven 3001, Belgium
e-mail: roberto.dippolito@noesissolutions.com
Gaston Geenslaan, 11, B4,
Leuven 3001, Belgium
e-mail: roberto.dippolito@noesissolutions.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Fakhre Ali
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: f.ali@cranfield.ac.uk
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: f.ali@cranfield.ac.uk
Konstantinos Tzanidakis
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Ioannis Goulos
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
Vassilios Pachidis
Head of Gas Turbine Engineering
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: v.pachidis@cranfield.ac.uk
Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: v.pachidis@cranfield.ac.uk
Roberto d'Ippolito
NOESIS Solutions,
Gaston Geenslaan, 11, B4,
Leuven 3001, Belgium
e-mail: roberto.dippolito@noesissolutions.com
Gaston Geenslaan, 11, B4,
Leuven 3001, Belgium
e-mail: roberto.dippolito@noesissolutions.com
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received March 24, 2015; final manuscript received May 7, 2015; published online June 23, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Dec 2015, 137(12): 121201 (10 pages)
Published Online: June 23, 2015
Article history
Received:
March 24, 2015
Revision Received:
May 7, 2015
Citation
Ali, F., Tzanidakis, K., Goulos, I., Pachidis, V., and d'Ippolito, R. (June 23, 2015). "Multi-objective Optimization of a Regenerative Rotorcraft Powerplant: Trade-off Between Overall Engine Weight and Fuel Economy." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. December 2015; 137(12): 121201. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030634
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Temperature Dependence of Aerated Turbine Lubricating Oil Degradation from a Lab-Scale Test Rig
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Multi-Disciplinary Surrogate-Based Optimization of a Compressor Rotor Blade Considering Ice Impact
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Experimental Investigations on Carbon Segmented Seals With Smooth and Pocketed Pads
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Multi-objective Optimization of Conceptual Rotorcraft Powerplants: Trade-off Between Rotorcraft Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2015)
Design Space Exploration and Optimization of Conceptual Rotorcraft
Powerplants
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2015)
Mission Analysis and Operational Optimization of Adaptive Cycle Microturbofan Engine in Surveillance and Firefighting Scenarios
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2019)
A Preliminary Design Tradeoff Study for an Advanced Propulsion Technology Rotorcraft at Mission Level
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Mechanical Construction
Turbo/Supercharger Compressors and Turbines for Aircraft Propulsion in WWII: Theory, History and Practice—Guidance from the Past for Modern Engineers and Students
Multiobjective Decision-Making Using Physical Programming
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Design Optimization of Multifunctional Aerospace Structures
Advanced Multifunctional Lightweight Aerostructures: Design, Development, and Implementation