Spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) gasoline engines, especially in downsized boosted engine platforms, are increasing their market share relative to port fuel injection (PFI) engines in U.S., European and Chinese vehicles due to better fuel economy by enabling higher compression ratios and higher specific power output. However, particulate matter (PM) emissions from engines are becoming a concern due to adverse human health and environment effects, and more stringent emission standards. To conduct a PM number and size comparison between SIDI and PFI systems, a 2.0 L boosted gasoline engine has been equipped and tested with both systems at different loads, air fuel ratios, spark timings, fuel pressures and injection timings for SIDI operation and loads, air fuel ratios and spark timings for PFI operation. Regardless of load, air fuel ratio, spark timing, fuel pressure, and injection timing, particle size distribution from SIDI and PFI is shown to be bimodal, exhibiting nucleation and accumulation mode particles. SIDI produces particle numbers that are an order of magnitude greater than PFI. Particle number can be reduced by retarding spark timing and operating the engine lean, both for SIDI and PFI operation. Increasing fuel injection pressure and optimizing injection timing with SIDI also reduces PM emissions. This study provides insight into the differences in PM emissions from boosted SIDI and PFI engines and an evaluation of PM reduction potential by varying engine operating parameters in boosted SIDI and PFI gasoline engines.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2014
Research-Article
Particulate Matter Emission Comparison of Spark Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI) and Port Fuel Injection (PFI) Operation of a Boosted Gasoline Engine
Jianye Su,
Jianye Su
National Engineering Laboratory for Automotive
Electronic Control Technology,
Electronic Control Technology,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
,Shanghai 200240
, China
;Walter E. Lay Automotive Laboratory,
University of Michigan
,Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Search for other works by this author on:
Weiyang Lin,
Weiyang Lin
Walter E. Lay Automotive Laboratory,
University of Michigan
,Ann Arbor, MI 41809
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeff Sterniak,
Jeff Sterniak
Robert Bosch LLC
,Farmington Hills, MI 48331
Search for other works by this author on:
Min Xu,
Min Xu
National Engineering Laboratory for Automotive
Electronic Control Technology,
Electronic Control Technology,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
,Shanghai 200240
, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Stanislav V. Bohac
Stanislav V. Bohac
Walter E. Lay Automotive Laboratory,
University of Michigan
,Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Search for other works by this author on:
Jianye Su
National Engineering Laboratory for Automotive
Electronic Control Technology,
Electronic Control Technology,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
,Shanghai 200240
, China
;Walter E. Lay Automotive Laboratory,
University of Michigan
,Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Weiyang Lin
Walter E. Lay Automotive Laboratory,
University of Michigan
,Ann Arbor, MI 41809
Jeff Sterniak
Robert Bosch LLC
,Farmington Hills, MI 48331
Min Xu
National Engineering Laboratory for Automotive
Electronic Control Technology,
Electronic Control Technology,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
,Shanghai 200240
, China
Stanislav V. Bohac
Walter E. Lay Automotive Laboratory,
University of Michigan
,Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Contributed by the Coal, Biomass and Alternate Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received February 14, 2014; final manuscript received February 17, 2014; published online May 5, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Sep 2014, 136(9): 091513 (6 pages)
Published Online: May 5, 2014
Article history
Received:
February 14, 2014
Revision Received:
February 17, 2014
Citation
Su, J., Lin, W., Sterniak, J., Xu, M., and Bohac, S. V. (May 5, 2014). "Particulate Matter Emission Comparison of Spark Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI) and Port Fuel Injection (PFI) Operation of a Boosted Gasoline Engine." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. September 2014; 136(9): 091513. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027274
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Burner and Flame Transfer Matrices of Jet Stabilized Flames: Influence of Jet Velocity and Fuel Properties
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Towards Low NOx Emissions Performance of A 65KW Recuperated Gas Turbine Operated on 100% Hydrogen
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
A Large Eddy Simulation Study on Hydrogen Microjets in Hot Vitiated Crossflow
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Effect of Optimization Criteria on Direct-Injection Homegeneous Charge Compression Ignition Gasoline Engine Performance and Emissions Using Fully Automated Experiments and Microgenetic Algorithms
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2004)
Engine Design and Operational Impacts on Particulate Matter Precursor Emissions
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March,2008)
Model-Based Unified Framework for Detection and Mitigation of Cyclic Torque Imbalance in a Gasoline Engine
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2021)
The Diesel Engine for Cars—Is There a Future?
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,1998)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
A Simple Carburetor
Case Studies in Fluid Mechanics with Sensitivities to Governing Variables
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Fans and Air Handling Systems
Thermal Management of Telecommunications Equipment