This paper presents the rotordynamic performance measurements and model predictions of a rotor supported on three-pad gas foil journal bearings (GFJBs) with various mechanical preloads. The rotor with its length of 240 mm, diameter of 40 mm, and weight of 19.6 N is supported on two GFJBs and one pair of gas foil thrust bearings (GFTBs), being a permanent magnet rotor of a high speed electric motor. Each bearing pad consisting of a top foil and a bump-strip layer is installed on a lobed bearing housing surface over the arc length of 120 deg along the circumference. Test three-pad GFJBs have four different mechanical preloads, i.e., 0 μm, 50 μm, 70 μm, 100 μm with a common radial nominal clearance of 150 μm. A series of speed-up tests are conducted up to 93 krpm to evaluate the effects of increasing mechanical preloads on the rotordynamic performance. Two sets of orthogonally positioned displacement sensors record the rotor horizontal and vertical motions at the thrust collar and the other end. Test results show that the filtered synchronous amplitudes change little, but the onset speed of subsynchronous motions (OSS) increases dramatically for the increasing mechanical preloads. In addition, test bearings with the 100 μm preload show a higher OSS in load-on-pad (LOP) condition than that in load-between-pads (LBP) condition. A comparison with test results for a one-pad GFJB with a single top foil and bump-strip layer reveals that three-pad GFJB has superior rotordynamic performance to the one-pad one. Finally, the test data benchmark against linear rotordynamic predictions to validate a rotor-GFJB model. In general, predicted natural frequencies of the rotor-bearing system and synchronous rotor motions agree well with test data. However, stability analyses underestimate OSSs recorded during the experimental tests.

References

References
1.
Agrawal
,
G. L.
,
1997
, “
Foil Air/Gas Bearing Technology—An Overview
,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-347.
2.
Kim
,
T. H.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2008
, “
Heavily Loaded Gas Foil Bearings: A Model Anchored to Test Data
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
130
(1), p.
012504
.10.1115/1.2770494
3.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Kim
,
T. H.
,
2009
, “
Analysis of Gas Foil Bearings Integrating FE Top Foil Models
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
42
(1), pp.
111
120
.10.1016/j.triboint.2008.05.003
4.
Kim
,
T. H.
,
Breedlove
,
A. W.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2009
, “
Characterization of a Foil Bearing Structure at Increasing Temperatures: Static and Dynamic Force Performance
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
131
(4), p.
041703
.10.1115/1.3195042
5.
Heshmat
,
H.
,
Shapiro
,
W.
, and
Gray
,
S.
,
1982
, “
Development of Foil Journal Bearings for High Load Capacity and High Speed Whirl Stability
,”
J. Lubr. Technol.
,
104
(2), pp.
149
156
.10.1115/1.3253173
6.
Kim
,
T. H.
,
San Andres
,
L.
,
Nourse
,
J.
,
Wade
,
J. L.
, and
Lubell
,
D. R.
,
2009
, “
Modeling of a Gas Foil Bearing for Microturbine Applications: Predictions Versus Experimental Stiffness and Damping Force Coefficients
,”
World Tribology Congress
,
Kyoto, Japan
, September 6–11.
7.
Kim
,
T. H.
, and
San Andres
,
L.
,
2009
, “
Effects of a Mechanical Preload on the Dynamic Force Response of Gas Foil Bearings: Measurements and Model Predictions
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
52
(4), pp.
569
580
.10.1080/10402000902825721
8.
Kim
,
D.
,
2007
, “
Parametric Studies on Static and Dynamic Performance of Air Foil Bearings With Different Top Foil Geometries and Bump Stiffness Distributions
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
129
(2), pp.
354
364
.10.1115/1.2540065
9.
Sim
,
K.
,
Lee.
,
Y.-B.
, and
Kim
,
T. H.
,
2013
, “
Effects of Mechanical Preload and Bearing Clearance on Rotordynamic Performance of Lobed Gas Foil Bearings for Oil-Free Turbochargers
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
56
(2), pp.
224
235
.10.1080/10402004.2012.737502
10.
Rubio
,
D.
, and
San Andres
,
L.
,
2006
, “
Bump-Type Foil Bearing Structural Stiffness: Experiments and Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
(3), pp.
653
660
.10.1115/1.2056047
11.
Sim
,
K.
,
Lee
,
Y.-B.
,
Kim
,
T. H.
, and
Lee
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Rotordynamic Performance of Shimmed Gas Foil Bearings for Oil-Free Turbochargers
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
134
(3), p.
031102
.10.1115/1.4005892
12.
Li
,
A. K.
,
Li
,
L. Y.
,
Peng
,
Y. D.
, and
Yi
,
J. H.
,
2013
, “
Fracture Toughness and Magnetic Properties of Sm2Co17-Based Magnets
,”
Adv. Mater. Res.
,
645
, pp.
81
84
.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.645.81
13.
San Andres
,
L.
, and
Kim
,
T. H.
,
2008
, “
Forced Nonlinear Response of Gas Foil Bearing Supported Rotors
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
41
(8), pp.
704
715
.10.1016/j.triboint.2007.12.009
14.
Lee
,
J. S.
, and
Kim
,
T. H.
,
2014
, “
Analysis of Three-Pad Gas Foil Journal Bearing for Increasing Mechanical Preloads
,”
J. Korean Soc. Tribol. Lubr. Eng.
,
30
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.10.9725/kstle.2014.30.1.1
You do not currently have access to this content.