Steady-state port flow simulations were carried out with a commercial three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code using Cartesian mesh with cut cells to study the prediction accuracy. The accuracy is assessed by comparing predicted and measured mass-flow rate and swirl and tumble torques at various valve lifts using different boundary condition setup and mesh topology relative to port orientation. The measured data are taken from standard steady-state flow bench tests of a production intake port. The predicted mass-flow rates agree to within 1% with the measured data between the intermediate and high valve lifts. At low valve lifts, slight overprediction in mass-flow rate can be observed. The predicted swirl and tumble torques are within 25% of the flow bench measurements. Several meshing parameters were examined in this study. These include: inlet plenum shape and outlet plenum/extension size, embedded sphere with varying minimum mesh size, finer meshes on port and valve surface, orientation of valve, and port centerline relative to the mesh lines. For all model orientations examined, only the mesh topology with the valve axis aligned closely with the mesh lines can capture the mass-flow rate drop for very high valve lifts due to flow separation. This study further demonstrated that it is possible to perform 3D CFD flow analyses to adequately simulate steady-state flow bench tests.

References

References
1.
Lippert
,
A. M.
,
Tahry
,
S. H.
,
El, Huebler
,
M. S.
,
Parrish
,
S. E.
,
Inoue
,
H.
, and
Noyori
,
T.
,
2004
, “
Development and Optimization of a Small-Displacement Spark-Ignition Direct-Injection Engine—Full-Load Operation
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2004-01-0034.10.4271/2004-01-0034
2.
Affes
,
H.
,
Trigui
,
N.
,
Smith
,
D.
, and
Griaznov
,
V.
,
1998
, “
Shape Optimization of IC Engine Ports and Chambers
,”
SAE
Paper No. 980127.10.4271/980127
3.
Gaikwad
,
S.
,
Arora
,
K.
,
Korivi
,
V.
, and
Cho
,
S. K.
,
2008
, “
Steady and Transient CFD Approach for Port Optimization
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2008-01-1430.10.4271/2008-01-1430
4.
Tanaka
,
K. K.
,
1929
, “
Air Flow Through a Suction Valve of Conical Seat
,”
Report of the Aeronautical Research Institute, Tokyo Imperial University
, 4(50), pp. 259–360.
5.
Kastner
,
L. J.
,
William
,
T. J.
, and
White
,
J. B.
,
1964
, “
Poppet Inlet Valve Characteristics and Their Influence of the Induction Process
,”
P. I. Mech. Eng.
,
178
, pp.
955
–975.
6.
Bicen
,
A. F.
,
Vafidis
,
C.
, and
Whitelaw
,
J. H.
,
1985
, “
Steady and Unsteady Through the Intake Valve of a Reciprocating Engine
,”
ASME J. Fluid Eng.
,
107
, pp.
413
–420.10.1115/1.3242502
7.
Gosman
,
A. D.
, and
Ahmed
,
A. M. Y.
,
1987
, “
Measurement and Multidimensional Prediction of Flow in an Axisymmetric Port/Valve Assembly
,”
SAE
Paper No. 870592.10.4271/870592
8.
Yang
,
X.
,
Lin
,
J.
, and
Jiang
,
D.
,
1990
, “
Three-Dimensional Simulation Calculation and Experimental Study of Flow in the Port of IC Engines
,” Trans. CSICE, 8(2), pp. 111–117.
9.
Godrie
,
P.
, and
Zellat
,
M.
,
1994
, “
Simulation of Flow Field Generated by Intake Port-Valve-Cylinder Configurations—Comparisons With Measurement and Applications
,”
SAE
Paper No. 940521.10.4271/940521
10.
Aïta
,
S.
,
Tabbal
,
A.
,
Munck
,
G.
,
Fujiwara
,
K.
,
Hongoh
,
H.
,
Tamura
,
E.
, and
Obana
,
S.
,
1990
, “
Numerical Simulation of Port-Valve-Cylinder Flow in Reciprocating Engines
,”
SAE
Paper No. 900820.10.4271/900820
11.
Dent
,
J. C.
, and
Chen
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Investigation of Steady Flow Through a Curved Inlet Port
,”
SAE
Paper No. 940522.10.4271/940522
12.
Tayler
, III,
W.
,
Leylek
,
L. H.
,
Sommer
,
R. G.
, and
Jain
,
S. K.
,
1998
, “
I.C. Engine Intake Region Design Modifications for Loss Reduction on CFD Methods
,”
SAE
Paper No. 981026.10.4271/981026
13.
Bianchi
,
G. M.
,
Cantore
,
G.
, and
Fontanesi
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Turbulence Modeling in CFD Simulation of ICE Intake Flows: The Discharge Coefficient Prediction
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2002-01-1118.10.4271/2002-01-1118
14.
Fontana
,
G.
,
Galloni
,
E.
, and
Palmaccio
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Development of a New Intake System for a Small Spark-Ignition Engine: Modeling the Flow Through the Inlet Valve
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2003-01-0369.10.4271/2003-01-0369
15.
Mesaros
,
L. M.
, and
Stephenson
,
P. W.
,
1999
, “
Application of Computational Mesh Optimizing Techniques to Heavy Duty Intake Port Modeling
,”
SAE
Paper No. 1999-01-1182.10.4271/1999-01-1182
16.
Selvaraj
,
B.
,
Sridhara
,
S. N.
,
Indraprakash
,
G.
,
Senthilkumar
,
A.
, and
Pangaonkar
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Effects of Intake Port Geometry on the Performance of an SI Engine
,” JSAE Paper No. 20119506/
SAE
Paper No. 2011-32-0506.10.4271/2011-32-0506
17.
Caulfield
,
S.
,
Rubenstein
,
B.
,
Martin
,
J.
,
Ruppel
,
P.
,
Meyer
,
M.
,
Lewis
,
S.
,
Tang
,
A.
, and
Tillock
,
B.
,
1999
, “
A Comparison Between CFD Predictions and Measurements of Inlet Port Discharge Coefficient and Flow Characteristics
,”
SAE
Paper No. 1999-01-3339/JSAE Paper No. 9938094.10.4271/1999-01-3339
18.
Rutland
,
C. J.
,
Pieper
,
C. M.
, and
Hessel
,
R.
,
1993
, “
Intake and Cylinder Flow Modeling With a Dual-Valve Port
,”
SAE
Paper No. 930069.10.4271/930069
19.
Convergent Science Inc.
,
2009
, “
CONVERGE™: A Three-Dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Program for Transient Flows With Complex Geometries
,” http://convergecfd.com/
You do not currently have access to this content.