The ultra-compact combustor (UCC) has the potential to offer improved thrust-to-weight and overall efficiency in a turbojet engine. The thrust-to-weight improvement is due to a reduction in engine weight by shortening the combustor section through the use of the revolutionary circumferential combustor design. The improved efficiency is achieved by using an increased fuel-to-air mass ratio and allowing the fuel to fully combust prior to exiting the UCC system. Furthermore, g-loaded combustion offers increased flame speeds that can lead to smaller combustion volumes. One of the issues with the UCC is that the circumferential combustion of the fuel results in hot gases present at the outside diameter of the core flow. These hot gases need to migrate radially from the circumferential cavity and blend with the core flow to present a uniform temperature distribution to the high-pressure turbine rotor. The current research focused on correlations to control the UCC cavity velocity, control the temperature profile throughout the UCC section, analyze the exhaust species exiting the combustor, and quantify pressure losses in the system. To achieve these goals, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was used on a UCC geometry scaled to a representative fighter-scale engine. The analysis included a study of cavity to core flow interaction characteristics, a 5- and 12-species combustion model of liquid and gaseous fuel, and determination of species exiting the combustor. Computational comparisons were also made between an engine realistic condition and an ambient pressure rig environment.

References

References
1.
Mattingly
,
J. D.
,
Heiser
,
W. H.
, and
Daley
,
D. H.
,
1987
,
Aircraft Engine Design
,
AIAA
,
Washington, DC
.
2.
Zelina
,
J.
,
Sturgess
,
G. J.
, and
Shouse
,
D. T.
,
2004
, “
The Behavior of an Ultra-Compact Combustor (UCC) Based on Centrifugally-Enhanced Turbulent Burning Rates
,” AIAA Paper No. 2004-3541.
3.
Zelina
,
J.
,
Shouse
,
D. T.
, and
Hancock
,
R. D.
,
2004
, “
Ultra-Compact Combustors for Advanced Gas Turbine Engines
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo
Expo (GT2004), Vienna, Austria, June 14–17,
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-53155.10.1115/GT2004-53155
4.
Lewis
,
G. D.
,
1973
, “
Swirling Flow Combustion—Fundamentals and Application
,”
Presented at AIAA/SAE 9th Propulsion Conference, Las Vegas, NV
, November 5–7, AIAA Paper No. 1973-1250.
5.
Sirignano
,
W. A.
,
Delplanque
,
J. P.
, and
Liu
,
F.
,
1997
, “
Selected Challenges in Jet and Rocket Engine Combustion Research
,”
33rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Seattle, WA
, July 6–9, Paper No. AIAA-1997-2701.
6.
Hermanson
,
K. S.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2000
, “
Effects of Mach Number on Secondary Flow Characteristics
,”
Int. J. Turbo. Jet Engines
,
17
, pp.
179
196
.10.1515/TJJ.2000.17.3.179
7.
Hermanson
,
K. S.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2000
, “
Effects of Inlet Conditions on Endwall Secondary Flows
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
16
(
2
), pp.
286
296
.10.2514/2.5567
8.
Anisko
,
J. F.
,
Anthenien
,
R. A.
, and
Zelina
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Numerical Investigation of Cavity-Vane Interactions Within the Ultra-Compact Combustor
,”
44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, Reno, NV
, January 9–12, Paper No. AIAA-2006-805.
9.
Baskharone
,
E.
,
2006
,
Principles of Turbomachinery in Air-Breathing Engines
,
1st ed.
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
10.
Bohan
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Analysis of Flow Migration in an Ultra-Compact Combustor
,” Master’s thesis,
Air Force Institute of Technology
,
WPAFB, OH
.
11.
FLUENT, Inc.
,
2006
.
FLUENT 6.3 User’s Guide
, Fluent Inc., Lebanon, NH.
12.
LeBay
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Characterization of Centrifugally-Loaded Flame Migration for Ultra-Compact Combustors
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Air Force Institute of Technology
,
WPAFB, OH
.
13.
Society of Automotive Engineers
,
1996
,
Procedure for the Analysis and Evaluation of Gaseous Emissions From Aircraft Engines
,
Aerospace Recommended Practice Paper No. ARP1533, Society of Automotive Engineers
,
Warrendale, PA
.
You do not currently have access to this content.