Quantifying fuel spray properties including penetration, cone angle, and vaporization processes sheds light on fuel-air mixing phenomenon, which governs subsequent combustion and emissions formation in diesel engines. Accurate experimental determination of these spray properties is a challenge but imperative to validate computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models for combustion prediction. This study proposes a new threshold independent method for determination of spray cone angle when using Mie back-scattering optical diagnostics to visualize diesel sprays in an optically accessible constant volume vessel. Test conditions include the influence of charge density (17.6 and 34.9 kg/m3) at 1990 bar injection pressure, and the influence of injection pressure (990, 1370, and 1980 bar) at a charge density of 34.8 kg/m3 on diesel fuel spray formation from a multi-hole injector into nitrogen at a temperature of 100 °C. Conventional thresholding to convert an image to black and white for processing and determination of cone angle is threshold subjective. As an alternative, an image processing method was developed, which fits a Gaussian curve to the intensity distribution of the spray at radial spray cross-sections and uses the resulting parameters to define the spray edge and hence cone angle. This Gaussian curve fitting methodology is shown to provide a robust method for cone angle determination, accounting for reductions in intensity at the radial spray edge. Results are presented for non-vaporizing sprays using this Gaussian curve fitting method and compared to the conventional thresholding based method.

References

References
1.
Stone
,
R.
, 2002,
Introduction to Internal Combustion Engines
,
3rd ed.
,
Macmillian Press Ltd.
,
London
.
2.
Tree
,
D. R.
, and
Svensson
,
K. I.
, 2007, “
Soot Processes in Compression Ignition Engines
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
,
33
, pp.
272
309
.
3.
Zhao
,
H.
, and
Ladommatos
,
N.
, 1998, “
Optical Diagnostics for Soot and Temperature Measurements in Diesel Engines
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
,
24
, pp.
221
255
.
4.
Aneja
,
R.
, and
Abraham
,
J.
, 1998, “
How Far Does the Liquid Penetrate in a Diesel Engine: Computed Results vs. Measurements?
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
138
, pp.
233
255
.
5.
Jawad
,
B.
,
Gulari
,
E.
, and
Henein
,
N. A.
, 1992, “
Characteristics of Intermittent Fuel Sprays
,”
Combust. Flame
,
88
, pp.
384
396
.
6.
Lee
,
C. S.
,
Park
,
S. W.
, and
Kwon
,
S. I.
, 2005, “
An Experimental Study on the Atomization and Combustion Characteristics of Biodiesel-Blended Fuels
,”
Energy Fuels
,
19
, pp.
2201
2208
.
7.
Backofen
,
D.
,
Koonig
,
M.
,
Tschoke
,
H.
, and
Jurgen
,
S.
, 2010, “
Spray Characterization of Alternative Diesel Fuels
,” FISITA World Automotive Congress: Automobiles and Sustainable Mobility, Paper No. F2010-A-054.
8.
Gostic
,
I.
,
Senghaas
,
C.
,
Willmann
,
M.
, and
Wensing
,
M.
, 2010, “
How Biodiesel/Diesel Fuel Blends Affect Spray Breakup and Emissions
,”
Proceedings ILASS – Europe 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Paper No. 125
.
9.
Morgan
,
R.
,
Wray
,
J.
,
Kennaird
,
D. A.
,
Crua
,
C.
, and
Heikal
,
M. R.
, 1998, “
The Influence of Injector Parameters on the Formation and Break-Up of a Diesel Spray
,” SAE Paper No. 981069.
10.
Naber
,
J. D.
, and
Siebers
,
D. L.
, 1996, “
Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays
,” SAE Paper No. 960024.
11.
Verhoeven
,
D. D.
,
Vanhemelryck
,
J. L.
, and
Baritaud
,
T.
, 1998, “
Macroscopic and Ignition Characteristics of High-Pressure Sprays of Single-Component Fuels
,” SAE Paper No. 981069.
12.
Nesbitt
,
J. E.
, 2011, “
Diesel Spray Mixing Limited Vaporization With Non-Ideal and Multi-Component Fuel Thermophysical Property Effects
,” Ph.D. thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI.
13.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
, 1989,
Atomization and Sprays
,
Taylor and Francis
,
London
.
14.
Klein-Douwel
,
R. J. H.
,
Frijters
,
P. J. M.
, and
Somers
,
L. M. T.
, 2007, “
Macroscopic Diesel Fuel Spray Shadowgraphy Using High Speed Digital Imaging in a High Pressure Cell
,”
Fuel
,
86
(
12–13
), pp.
1994
2007
.
15.
Otsu
,
N.
, 1979, “
A Threshold Selection Method From Gray-Level Histograms
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
62
66
.
16.
Nesbitt
,
J. E.
,
Naber
,
J. D.
, Lee, S-Y.,
Kurtz
,
E.
, Ge, H-W., and
Robarge
,
N.
, 2011, “
Investigation of Vaporizing Diesel Liquid Spray Plume to Plume Penetration Variations
,”
Proceedings of 23rd ILASS Americas Conference
, Paper No. 132.
17.
Klein-Douwel
,
R. J. H.
,
Frijters
,
P. J. M.
,
Seykens
,
X. L. J.
,
Somers
,
L. M. T.
, and
Baert
,
R. S. G.
, 2009, “
Gas Density and Rail Pressure Effects on Diesel Spray Growth From a Heavy-Duty Common Rail Injector
,”
Energy Fuels
,
23
(
4
), pp.
1832
1842
.
18.
Kato
,
T.
,
Omachi
,
S.
, and
Aso
,
H.
, 2002, “
Asymmetric Gaussian and Its Application to Pattern Recognition
,”
Proceedings on the Joint IAPR International Workshop on Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition
, pp.
405
413
.
You do not currently have access to this content.