Static and rotordynamic coefficients are measured for a rocker-pivot, tilting-pad journal bearing (TPJB) with 50 and 60% offset pads in a load-between-pad (LBP) configuration. The bearing uses leading-edge-groove direct lubrication and has the following characteristics: 5-pads, 101.6 mm (4.0 in) nominal diameter,0.0814 -0.0837 mm (0.0032–0.0033 in) radial bearing clearance, 0.25 to 0.27 preload, and 60.325 mm (2.375 in) axial pad length. Tests were performed on a floating bearing test rig with unit loads from 0 to 3101 kPa (450 psi) and speeds from 7 to 16 krpm. Dynamic tests were conducted over a range of frequencies (20 to 320 Hz) to obtain complex dynamic stiffness coefficients as functions of excitation frequency. For most test conditions, the real dynamic stiffness functions were well fitted with a quadratic function with respect to frequency. This curve fit allowed for the stiffness frequency dependency to be captured by including an added mass matrix [M] to a conventional [K][C] model, yielding a frequency independent [K][C][M] model. The imaginary dynamic stiffness coefficients increased linearly with frequency, producing frequency-independent direct damping coefficients. Direct stiffness coefficients were larger for the 60% offset bearing at light unit loads. At high loads, the 50% offset configuration had a larger stiffness in the loaded direction, while the unloaded direct stiffness was approximately the same for both pivot offsets. Cross-coupled stiffness coefficients were positive and significantly smaller than direct stiffness coefficients. Negative direct added-mass coefficients were obtained for both offsets, especially in the unloaded direction. Cross-coupled added-mass coefficients are generally positive and of the same sign. Direct damping coefficients were mostly independent of load and speed, showing no appreciable difference between pivot offsets. Cross-coupled damping coefficients had the same sign and were much smaller than direct coefficients. Measured static eccentricities suggested cross coupling stiffness exists for both pivot offsets, agreeing with dynamic measurements. Static stiffness measurements showed good agreement with the loaded, direct dynamic stiffness coefficients.

References

References
1.
Lund
,
J. W.
, 1964, “
Spring and Damping Coefficients for the Tilting-Pad Journal Bearing
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
7
, pp.
342
352
.
2.
Ha
,
H.
, and
Yang
,
S.
, 1999, “
Excitation Frequency Effects on the Stiffness and Damping Coefficients of a Five-Pad Tilting Pad Journal Bearing
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
, pp.
517
522
.
3.
Wygant
,
K. D.
, 2001, “
The Influence of Negative Preload and Nonsynchronous Excitation on the Performance of Tilting Pad Journal Bearings
,”
Ph.D. dissertation
,
University of Virginia
,
Charlottesville, VA
.
4.
Rodriguez
,
L.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 2006, “
Frequency Dependency of Measured and Predicted Rotordynamic Coefficients for Load-on-Pad Flexible-Pivot Tilting-Pad Bearing
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
128
(
2
), pp.
388
395
.
5.
Al-Ghasem
,
A.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 2006,
“Measurements Versus Predictions for a High-Speed Flexure-Pivot Tilting-Pad Bearing (Load-Between-Pad Configuration),”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
(
4
), pp.
896
906
.
6.
Hensley
,
E. J.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 2008,
“Measurements Versus Predictions for the Rotordynamic Characteristics of a Flexure Pivot-Pad Tilting Pad Bearing in an LBP Condition at Higher Unit Loads,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2008
, Paper GT2008-50069, June 9–13,
Berlin, Germany
.
7.
Dmochowski
,
W.
, 2006, “
Dynamic Properties of Tilting-Pad Journal Bearings: Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Frequency Effects Due to Pivot Flexibility
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land
,
Sea and Air Barcelona
,
Spain
.
8.
Carter
,
C.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 2008
“Measurements Versus Predictions for the Rotordynamic Characteristics of a 5-Pad, Rocker-Pivot, Tilting-Pad Bearing in Load Between Pad Configuration,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2008
, Paper GT2008-50069, June 9–13,
Berlin, Germany
.
9.
Childs
,
D.
, and
Harris
,
J.
, 2009, “
Static Performance Characteristics and Rotordynamic Coefficients for a Four-Pad Ball-in-Socket Tilting Pad Journal Bearing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
131
, p.
062502
.
10.
Schmeid
,
J.
,
Fedorov
,
A.
, and
Grigoriev
,
B.
, 2010,
“Non-Synchronous Tilting Pad Bearing Characteristics,”
Proceedings of the 10th IFToMM International Conference on Rotordynamics
, September 12–15,
Seoul, Korea
.
11.
Delgado
,
A.
,
Ertas
,
B.
,
Drexel
,
M.
,
Naldi
,
L.
, and
Vannini
,
G.
, 2010,
“Identification and Prediction of Force Coefficients in a Five-Pad and Four-Pad Tilting Pad Bearing for Load-on-Pad and Load-Between-Pad Configurations,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010
, Paper GT2010-23802, June 14–18,
Glasgow, UK
.
12.
Kulhanek
,
C.
, 2010, “
Dynamic and Static Characteristics of a Rocker-Pivot, Tilting-Pad Bearing With 50% and 60% Offsets
,”
M.S. thesis
,
Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
13.
Kaul
,
A.
, 1999, “
Design and Development of a Test Setup for the Experimental Determination of the Rotordynamic and Leakage Characteristics of Annular Bushing Oil Seals
,”
M.S. thesis
,
Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
14.
Glienicke
,
J.
, 1966,
“Experimental Investigation of Stiffness and Damping Coefficients of Turbine Bearings and Their Application to Instability Predictions,”
Proceedings of the International Mech. E.
,
181
(
3B
), pp.
116
129
.
15.
Childs
,
D.
, and
Hale
,
K.
, 1994, “
A Test Apparatus and Facility to Identify the Rotordynamic Coefficients of High-Speed Hydrostatic Bearings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
116
, pp.
337
344
.
16.
Rouvas
,
C.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 1993, “
A Parameter Identification Method for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of a High Reynolds Number Hydrostatic Bearing
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
115
, pp.
264
270
.
You do not currently have access to this content.