In recent years, lean-premixed (LP) combustors have been widely studied due to their potential to reduce NOx emissions in comparison to diffusion type combustors. However, the fact that the fuels and oxidizers are mixed upstream of the combustion zone makes LP type of combustors a candidate for upstream flame propagation (i.e., flashback) in the premixer that is typically not designed to sustain high temperatures. Moreover, there has been a recent demand for fuel-flexible gas turbines that can operate on hydrogen-enriched fuels like Syngas. Combustors originally designed for slower kinetics fuels like natural gas can potentially encounter flashback if operated with faster burning fuels like those containing hydrogen as a constituent. There exists a clear need in fuel-flexible lean-premixed combustors to control flashback that will not only prevent costly component damage but will also enhance the operability margin of engines. A successful attempt has been made to control flashback in an atmospheric LP combustor, burning natural gas-air mixtures, via the application of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD). A low-power DBD actuator was designed, fabricated and integrated into a premixer made out of quartz. The actuator was tuned to produce a low magnitude ionic wind with an intention to modify the velocity profile in the premixer. Flashback conditions were created by decreasing the air flow rate while keeping the fuel flow rate constant. Within this experimental setup, flashback happened in the core flow along the axis of the cylindrical premixer. Results show that the utilization of the DBD delays the occurrence of flashback to higher equivalence ratios. Improvements as high as about 5% of the flashback limit have been obtained without compromising the blowout limit. It is anticipated that this novel application of DBD will lead to future demonstrations of the concept under realistic gas turbine operating conditions.

References

1.
Kuo
,
K. K.
, 2005,
Principles of Combustion
, 2nd ed.,
John Wiley and Sons
,
Hoboken
, Chap. 1, 3, and 6.
2.
Schäfer
,
O.
,
Koch
,
R.
, and
Wittig
,
S.
, 2003, “
Flashback in Lean Prevaporized Premixed Combustion: Non-swirling Turbulent Pipe Flow Study
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
125
(
3
), pp.
670
676
.
3.
Davu
,
D.
,
Franco
,
R.
, and
Choudhuri
,
A.
, 2005, “
Investigation on Flashback propensity of Syngas Premixed
,” AIAA 2005-3585,
41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
,
Tucson
,
AZ
, Paper No. AIAA 2005–3585.
4.
Lieuwen
,
T.
, 2008,
“Flashback Characteristics of Syngas-Type Fuels Under Steady and Pulsating Conditions
,” School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, Report No. DE-FG26-04NT42176.
5.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
, and
Ballal
,
D. R.
, 2010,
Gas Turbine Combustion: Alternative Fuels and Emissions
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton
, Chap. 2.
6.
Lieuwen
,
T.
,
McDonell
,
V.
,
Santavicca
,
D.
, and
Sattelmayer
,
T.
, 2008, “
Burner Development and Operability Issues Associated With Steady Flowing Syngas Fired Combustors
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
180
(
6
), pp.
1169
1192
.
7.
Lewis
,
B.
, and
von Elbe
,
G.
, 1961,
Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases
,
Academic Press
,
New York.
8.
Burton
,
F.
, 1959, “
Effect of Initial Temperature on Flash Back of Laminar and Turbulent Burner Flames
,”
Indust. Eng. Chem.
,
51
(
4
), pp.
564
566
.
9.
Plee
,
S. L.
, and
Mellor
,
A. M.
, 1978, “
Review of Flashback Reported in Prevaporizing/Premixing Combustors,” Combust
,
Flame
,
32
, pp.
193
203
.
10.
Wohl
,
K.
, 1952, “
Quenching, Flash-back, Blow-off - Theory and Experiments
,”
4th International Symposium on Combustion
,
Pittsburgh
,
PA
, pp.
69
89
.
11.
Laurentie
,
J.-C.
,
Jolibois
,
J.
, and
Moreau
,
E.
, 2009, “
Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge: Effect of Encapsulation of the Grounded Electrode on the Electromechanical Characteristics of the Plasma Actuator
,”
J. Electrost.
,
67
, pp.
93
98
.
12.
Jacob
,
J.
,
Rivir
,
R.
,
Carter
,
C.
, and
Estevadeordal
,
J.
, 2004, “
Boundary Layer Flow Control Using AC Discharge Plasma Actuators
,” AIAA 2nd Flow Control Meeting, Portland, OR, Paper No. AIAA 2004 2128.
13.
Thomas
,
F. O.
,
Corke
,
T. C.
,
Iqbal
,
M.
,
Kozlov
,
A.
, and
Schatzman
,
D.
, 2009, “
Optimization of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Active Aerodynamic Flow Control
,”
AIAA J.
,
47
(
9
), pp.
2169
2178
.
14.
De Zilwaa
,
S. R. N.
,
Khezzarb
,
L.
, and
Whitelaw
,
J. H.
, 2000, “
Flows Through Plane Sudden-Expansions
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
32
, pp.
313
329
.
15.
Roth
,
J. R.
, and
Dai
,
X.
, 2006, “
Optimization of the Aerodynamic Plasma Actuator as a Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) Electrical Device
,”
44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno
,
NV
, pp.
1
28
.
16.
Versailles
,
P.
,
Ghosh
,
S.
,
Vo
,
H. D.
, and
Masson
,
C.
, 2010, “
Preliminary Assessment of Wind Turbine Blade Lift Control via Plasma Actuation
,”
Wind Eng.
,
35
, pp.
339
356
.
17.
Mureithi
,
N. W.
,
Rodriguez
,
M.
,
Versailles
,
P.
,
Pham
,
A.
, and
Vo
,
H. D.
, 2008, “
A POD Based Analysis of the 2D Cylinder Wake Mode Interactions
,”
9th Internal Conference on FIV
,
Prague
,
Czech Republic
, pp.
1
6
.
18.
Grundmann
,
S.
, and
Tropea
,
C.
, 2007, “
Experimental Transition Delay Using Glow-Discharge Plasma Actuators
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
42
(
4
), pp.
653
657
.
19.
Starikovskii
,
A. Y.
, 2005, “
Plasma Supported Combustion
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
30
(
2
), pp.
2405
2417
.
20.
Rosocha
,
L. A.
,
Coates
,
D. M.
,
Platts
,
D.
, and
Stange
,
S.
, 2004, “
Plasma-Enhanced Combustion of Propane Using a Silent Discharge
,”
Phys. Plasma
,
11
,
7
pp.
21.
Cha
,
M. S.
,
Lee
,
S. M.
,
Kim
,
K. T.
, and
Chung
,
S. H.
, 2005, “
Soot Suppression by Nonthermal Plasma in Coflow Jet Diffusion Flames Using a Dielectric Barrier Discharge
,”
Combust. Flame
,
141
, pp.
438
447
.
22.
Vagelopoulos
,
C. M.
, and
Egolfopoulos
,
F. N.
, 1998, “
Direct Experimental Determination of Laminar Flame Speeds
,”
Twenty-Seventh Symposium (International) on Combustion
,
27
(
1
), pp.
513
519
.
You do not currently have access to this content.