This paper is intended to serve as a template for incorporating technical management majors into a traditional engineering design course. In 2002, the Secretary of the Air Force encouraged the United States Air Force (USAF) Academy to initiate a new interdisciplinary academic major related to systems engineering. This direction was given in an effort to help meet the Air Force’s growing need for “systems” minded officers to manage the development and acquisition of its ever more complex weapons systems. The curriculum for the new systems engineering management (SEM) major is related to the “engineering of large, complex systems and the integration of the many subsystems that comprise the larger system” and differs in the level of technical content from the traditional engineering major. The program allows emphasis in specific cadet—selected engineering tracks with additional course work in human systems, operations research, and program management. Specifically, this paper documents how individual SEM majors have been integrated into aeronautical engineering design teams within a senior level capstone course to complete the preliminary design of a gas turbine engine. As the Aeronautical Engineering (AE) cadets performed the detailed engine design, the SEM cadets were responsible for tracking performance, cost, schedule, and technical risk. Internal and external student assessments indicate that this integration has been successful at exposing both the AE majors and the SEM majors to the benefits of “systems thinking” by giving all the opportunity to employ SE tools in the context of a realistic aircraft engine design project.

References

References
1.
Fink
,
L. D.
, 2003,
Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses
,
Jossey-Bass
,
San Francisco
.
2.
von Ohain
,
H.
,
forward
to Mattingly
,
J. D.
, 2006,
Elements of Propulsion Gas Turbines and Rockets
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
, Reston, VA.
3.
Defense Acquisition University,
SYS202 Intermediate Systems Planning, Research, Development, and Engineering, Part 1.
https://learn.dau.mil/html/login/login.jsp
4.
Defense Acquisition University,
SYS101: Fundamentals of Systems Planning, Research, Development, and Engineering.
https://learn.dau.mil/html/login/login.jsp.
5.
Mattingly
,
J.
,
Heiser
,
D. W. H.
, and
Pratt
,
D. T.
, 2002,
Aircraft Engine Design
,
2nd ed.
,
AIAA
,
Reston VA
.
6.
Defense Acquisition University,
Introduction to Earned Value Management
. https://learn.dau.mil/html/login/login.jsp.
7.
Blanchard
,
B. S.
, and
Fabrycky
,
W. J.
, 2011,
Systems Engineering and Analysis
,
5th ed.
,
Prentice Hall
,
New York.
8.
Krigelman
,
D.
, 2009,
“System Engineering Documentation”
,
INCOSE Orlando Chapter Meeting
, 17 September.
9.
Younossi
,
O.
,
Arena
,
M. V.
,
Moore
,
R. M.
,
Lorell
,
M.
,
Mason
,
J.
, and
Graser
,
J. C
., 2002
“Military Jet Engine Acquisition, Technology Basics and Cost-Estimating Methodology,”
RAND Project Air Force
.
You do not currently have access to this content.