Numerical modeling of aero engine combustors under relight conditions is a matter of continuously increasing importance due to the demanding engine certification regulations. In order to reduce the complexity and the cost of the numerical modeling, common practice is to replace the atomizer’s swirlers with velocity profiles boundary conditions, very often scaled down from nominal operating conditions assuming similarity of the swirler flowfield. The current numerical study focuses on the flowfield characteristics of an axially swirled atomizer operating within a windmilling engine environment. The scalability of the velocity profile from higher power settings is examined. Observations on the performance of the axial swirler under relight conditions are also made. Experimental data was used as a validation platform for the numerical solver, after a grid sensitivity study and a turbulence model selection process. Boundary conditions for simulating the windmilling environment were extracted from experimental work. The swirler axial and tangential velocity profiles were normalized using the swirler inlet velocity. Results showed that both profiles are only scalable for windmilling conditions of high flight Mach number ( 0.5). At low flight Mach numbers, the actual profile had a lower velocity than that predicted through scaling. The swirl number was found to deteriorate significantly with the flight velocity following a linear trend, reducing significantly the expected flame quality. As a consequence the burner is forced to operate at the edge of its stability loop with low certainty regarding its successful relight.

References

References
1.
Vincent
,
K.
,
Huntely
,
S.
, and
Wilsted
,
H.
, 1952, “
Comparison of Locked-Rotor and Windmilling Drag Characteristics of an Axial-Flow-Compressor Type Turbo Jet Engine
,”
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
, Tech. Report RM E51K15.
2.
Caines
,
B.
,
Hicks
,
R.
, and
Wilson
,
C.
, 2001, “
Influence of Sub-Atmospheric Conditions on the Performance on an Airblast Atomizer
,” Proceedings of 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit,
Salt Lake City
,
UT
, July 8–11, Paper No. AIAA-2001-3573.
3.
Beck
,
J.
,
Lefebvre
,
A.
, and
Koblish
,
T.
, 1989, “
Airblast Atomiztion at Conditions of Low Air Velocity
,”
27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting
, Reno, NV, January 9–12, Paper No. AIAA-1989-0217.
4.
Kozaily
,
J.
,
Zachos
,
P.
,
Pachidis
,
V.
, and
Singh
,
R.
, 2009, “
Gas Turbine Fuel Atomisation Dynamics Under Sub-Atmospheric Conditions
,” XIX International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines 2009 (ISABE 2009), Montreal, Canada, September 7–11, Paper No. ISABE-2009-1160, pp.
502
510
.
5.
Sheen
,
H.
,
Chen
,
W.
,
Jeng
,
S.
, and
Huang
,
T.
, 1996, “
Correlation of Swirl Number for a Radial-Type Swirl Generator
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
,
12
, pp.
444
451
.
6.
Chatterjee
,
D.
,
Datta
,
A.
,
Ghosh
,
A.
, and
Som
,
S.
, 2004, “
Effects of Inlet Air Swirl and Spray Cone Angle on Combustion and Emission Performance of a Liquid Fuel Spray in a Gas Turbine Combustor
,”
J. Inst. Eng. AS (India)
,
85
, pp.
41
46
.
7.
Sloan
,
D.
,
Smith
,
P.
, and
Smoot
,
D.
, 1986, “
Modeling of Swirl in Turbulent Flow Systems
,”
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
,
12
(
3
), pp.
163
250
.
8.
Kilik
,
E.
, 1976, “
The Influence of Swirler Design Parameters on the Aerodynamics of the Downstream Recirculation Region
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK.
9.
Huang
,
Y.
, and
Yang
,
V.
, 2005, “
Effect of Swirl on Combustion Dynamics in a Lean-Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustor
,”
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
30
, pp.
1775
1782
.
10.
Palies
,
P.
,
Durox
,
D.
,
Schuller
,
T.
, and
Candel
,
S.
, 2011, “
Experimental Study on the Effect of Swirler Geometry and Swirl Number on Flame Describing Functions
”.
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
183
, pp.
704
717
.
11.
Beer
,
J.
, and
Chigier
,
N.
, 1972,
Combustion Aerodynamics
,
Applied Science Publishers Ltd.
,
London
.
12.
Gupta
,
A.
,
Lilley
,
D.
, and
Syred
,
N.
, 1984,
Swirl Flows
,
Abacus Press
,
Tunbridge Wells, England
.
13.
Lefebvre
,
A.
, 1999,
Gas Turbine Combustion
,
2nd ed.
,
Taylor & Francis
,
New York
.
14.
Lilley
,
D.
, 1977, “
Swirl Flows in Combustion: A Review
,”
AIAA J.
,
15
(
8
), pp.
1063
1078
.
15.
Lilley
,
D.
, 1985, “
Investigations of Flowfields Found in Typical Combustor Geometries
,” NASA Contractor Report No. 3869.
16.
Widmann
,
J.
,
Charagundla
,
S.
, and
Presser
,
C.
, 2000, “
Aerodynamic Study of a Vane-Cascade Swirl Generator
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
55
(
22
), pp.
5311
5320
.
17.
Brum
,
R.
, and
Samuelsen
,
G.
, 1982, “
Two-Component Laser Anemometry Measurements in a Non-Reacting and Reacting Complex Flow Model Combustor
,”
Western States Section/The Combustion Institute
,
Sandia National Laboratories
,
Livermore, CA
.
18.
Davoudzadeh
,
F.
,
Liu
,
N.
, and
Moder
,
J.
, 2006, “
Investigation of Swirling Air Flows Generated by Axial Swirlers in a Flame Tube
,” NASA Glenn Research Centre, Tech. Report No. TM-2006-214252.
19.
Shih
,
T.
,
Liou
,
W.
,
Shabbir
,
A.
,
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
, 1995, “
A New k-ε Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
24
(
3
), pp.
227
238
.
20.
Escue
,
A.
, and
Cui
,
J.
, 2010, “
Comparison of Turbulence Models in Simulating Swirling Pipe Flows
,”
Appl. Math. Model.
,
34
(
10
), pp.
2840
2849
.
21.
Rocklage-Marliani
,
G.
,
Schmidts
,
M.
, and
Ram
,
I. V.
, 2003, “
Three-Dimensional Laser-Doppler Velocimeter Measurements in Swirling Turbulent Pipe Flow
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
,
70
, pp.
43
67
.
22.
Weber
,
R.
,
Visser
,
B.
, and
Boysan
,
F.
, 1990, “
Assessment of Turbulence Modeling for Engineering Prediction of Swirling Vortices in the Near Burner Zone
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
11
(
3
), pp.
225
235
.
23.
Mongia
,
H.
, 2008, “
Recent Progress in Comprehensive Modelling of Gas Turbine Combustion
,” Proceedings of 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 7–10, Report No. AIAA-2008-1445.
24.
Wang
,
S.
,
Yang
,
V.
,
Hsiao
,
G.
,
Hsieh
,
S.
, and
Mongia
,
H.
, 2007, “
Large-Eddy Simulations of a Gas Turbine Swirl Injector Flow Dynamics
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
583
, pp.
99
122
.
25.
Wang
,
P.
, and
Bai
,
X.
, 2005, “
Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Swirling Flows in a Dump Combustor: A Sensitivity Study
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
47
(
2
), pp.
99
120
.
26.
Freitag
,
M.
,
Klein
,
M.
,
Gregor
,
M.
,
Geyer
,
D.
,
Schneider
,
C.
,
Dreizler
,
A.
, and
Janicka
,
J.
, 2006, “
Mixing Analysis of a Swirling Recirculating Flow Using DNS and Experimental Data
”.
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
27
(
4
), pp.
636
643
.
27.
Wegner
,
B.
,
Maltsev
,
A.
,
Schneider
,
C.
,
Sadiki
,
A.
,
Dreizler
,
A.
, and
Janicka
,
J.
, 2004, “
Assessment of Unsteady RANS in Predicting Swirl Flow Instability Based on LES and Experiments
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
25
, pp.
528
536
.
28.
ANSYS, 2009,
ANSYS Fluent 12.1 User and Theory Guide
,
ANSYS, Inc.
,
Southpointe, PA
.
29.
Rose
,
W.
, 1962, “
A Swirling Round Turbulent Jet: 1—Mean-Flow Measurements
,”
J. Appl. Mech.
,
29
(
4
), pp.
615
625
.
30.
Chigier
,
N.
, and
Chervinsky
,
A.
, 1967, “
Experimental Investigation of Swirling Vortex Motion in Jets
,”
J. Appl. Mech.
,
34
(
2
), pp.
443
451
.
31.
Read
,
R.
, 2008, “
Experimental Investigations Into High-Altitude Relight of a Gas Turbine
”. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
32.
Gupta
,
A.
, and
Lilley
,
D.
, 1985,
Flowfield Modelling and Diagnostics
,
Abacus
,
Tunbridge Wells
,
England
.
You do not currently have access to this content.